Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1. By pointing out that the sun rises & sets you feel that we are just repeating what we’ve told?
    5
  2. Yet again, 23.4 degrees.
    5
  3. What do you find silly about the evidence for a globe?
    5
  4. Why not produce your evidence that aether exists?
    5
  5. They ignore the others or claim they’re branches of NASA when their existence is pointed out. I’ve never had an answer as to who launched Sputnik.
    5
  6. Motion if the sun, horizons, angke to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses; explain how you think The Government is manipulating them. That you don’t know how the shape can be determined doesn’t mean nobody knows.
    5
  7.  @Globehoax  Still waiting on your evidence….
    5
  8. What collaboration?
    5
  9.  @Globeisahoax  Really? Then why can’t you explain how a sphere only a lights a limited misshapen area?
    5
  10.  @KangenAlec  Explain why it would only light a select, missshapen area at a time. The notion is essential to FE, you all claim to understand how it works do his come none of you can produce this explanation? It’s supposed to be simple do what’s so difficult?
    5
  11.  @redspotaudio  The cover traps rising heat; nothing go do with the moon having a cooling effect. You have to think of all variables in an experiment, not just the factor you’re interested in.
    5
  12. Edited out.
    5
  13.  @KangenAlec  Evidence and relevance?
    4
  14. Such as?
    4
  15. Nothing stopping you getting a permit the same way you get a visa. Or you could just go with a tour operator and see for yourself the 24hrs Antarctic sun that you insist doesn't exist. Meanwhile you haven't set foot in Antarctica but belief you know more about that anyone else.
    4
  16.  @Globeisahoaxx  Still waiting to hear how you determined that. What’s taking so long?
    4
  17.  @KangenAlec  How does a luminary have craters and shadows? How can it have phases if it is always completely lit?
    4
  18. It’s easy for scientists to point out Dubay’s errors. Why do you think Dubay won’t debate anybody?
    4
  19. Guess or hunch is the vernacular meaning of theory. Scientific theories are comprehensive explanations for phenomena that are well substantiated by extensive evidence.
    4
  20. Ignoring that the sun rises & sets is logical?
    4
  21. Jubilee edited the answers out; is that not apparent from the breaks in continuity?
    4
  22. By sending a radio signal from inside controls to robotic arms outside. What are you actually asking about?
    4
  23.  @Globeishoax  Better still go to Professor Dave's channel and see the debate he had with FED.
    4
  24. @F2 He doesn't answers any questions.
    4
  25. Denying reality in favour of belief, not believing differently. There’s a considerable difference.
    4
  26.  @KangenAlec  Karman line is about 100km up.
    4
  27. We can provide explanations and FE’ers can’t and you believe the FE’ets are correct?
    4
  28.  @Globehoax  Still denying telescopes exist then?
    4
  29.  @KangenAlec  You think NASA is faking FE as well as a the globe?
    4
  30.  @KangenAlec  Motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris, two celestial poles all contradict FE. Still waiting on your explanations.
    4
  31. In what way do you think FE’ers are correct?
    4
  32.  @KangenAlec  It passes overhead on s predictable schedule. You still haven’t explained how you think something in the atmosphere would be unaffected by the atmosphere.
    4
  33. Conservation of momentum. The atmosphere moves. Gravity.
    4
  34. What’s Dubay’s explanation for how density (a ratio with no direction) can act as a force and why in a consistent direction?
    4
  35. Eratothenes measured the curve around 300BC. It had been deduced the Earth was a sphere around 500BC from the motion of sun, horizons, eclipses and the angle to Polaris changing with latitude.
    4
  36.  @luisdiegosalas  "Some Flat Earthers have come with very clever interpretations of certain experiments." Clever is not the word that comes to mind.
    4
  37.  @Globehoax  And yet all the evidence supports a globe. When are you going to cough the FE evidence?
    4
  38.  @Globeisahoax  Tilted relative to the orbital plane not your imaginary universal up & down. Simple enough concept but beyond your mental abilities.
    4
  39. ​ @Boss_Feed  Most research in academia is supported through government funding agencies. We write grant applications describing what it is we wish to do (aim), the basis for the research (reasoning, hypotheses), how we intend to go about it (methodology) and what the expected results might be. The grants are submitted to the appropriate agencies (they are usually multiple dedicated to particular areas) where the applications are peer-reviewed (committees made up of fellow academics). Those considered most promising receive a grant. If & when you receive a grant then you are legally obliged to spend it on the project specified in the application. There is no obligation to arrive at particular results or draw particular conclusions; we don't receive instructions prior to writing a grant that tell us what we should be doing. We usually run into obstacles; if we knew what was going to happen it wouldn't be research. Even with the most promising projects dead ends will be encountered. While the awarding body will want updates so they know how it's going, the results are continually used to write research papers that are published in research journals. They lay out aim, methodology, results & conclusion. They too are peer-reviewed (by academics) and can be rejected. Over time, the multiple inputs from different pieces of research draw an increasingly complete picture of a subject. What makes it into school or university textbooks (usually written by academics) is the culmination of decades of work. They're not instructions or indoctrinations from on high; it's the long term result of the work we've been doing.
    4
  40.  @Boss_Feed  Government funded, not government sanctioned and the government never sees the methodology (reread what I wrote and think) nor gives me a “go ahead”. Ignorance is not knowledge; you not knowing the basis for a scientific conclusion means precisely that you personally do not know the basis. It is not mind-blasting knowledge that nobody knows or that nobody has bothered to check.
    4
  41. They are correct. A scientific law is simply a description of a phenomenon while a scientific theory is the explanation for how the phenomenon occurs. Uncovering the mechanism rather than describing the effect is the highest accomplishment.
    4
  42. Owen Heart Conservation of momentum. The satellites orbit the Earth and move with the Earth. How do meteorites pass through the dome?
    4
  43. worthless Aussie sinner saved by grace alone The predictions enable us to send probes where we want; if the model were wrong these predictions would be incorrect.
    4
  44. The video has been heavily edited to appear balanced, which meant the one way flow of evidence in favour of a globe was removed.
    4
  45. They’re referring to some meteorites that were found in Antarctica that were of lunar origin. They think scientists cant distinguish between the two.
    4
  46.  @aaronwhite3058  Mars is 60 million miles away, not 60 light years. I did note that a light year was about 6 trillion miles. If you are prepared to use a properly focussed telescope you will also find that Mars, Venus, Saturn etc are other planets within the solar system, not stars. They are also visible at night most f the year, not every 15-17 years. Where do you get your information from?
    4
  47.  @aaronwhite3058  As long as it's on the night side of Earth you should be able to see it, weather permitting; I think you are referring to the variation in magnitude (brightness) which changes according to the relative position of Earth, Mars & sun.
    4
  48. They’re very much hooked on personal experience & observation only.
    4
  49.  @Globeishoaxx  Still waiting on your evidence.
    4
  50.  @KangenAlec  What keeps it up, what makes it move, what makes it change direction? How does a sun with a course thousands of miles in diameter remain only 50 miles from you? You claim you have the answers so produce them.
    4