Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1.  @Globehoax  Answer his question.
    6
  2.  @Globeisahoax  An excellent example of FE’ers being unable to think beyond two options.
    6
  3. The limits of natural philosophy became apparent: our senses are limited. The notion that science is owned by “wealthy evil people” is a claim used by those who can’t understand science.
    6
  4. FE’er brains can’t handle more than one variable.
    5
  5. In which they demonstrated curvature… Do you know the meaning of convex?
    5
  6.  @Globeisahoaxx  Which ignores emergency landings that contradicts FE and certainly doesn’t explain direct flight between southern continents.
    5
  7. It means raise or lift. You realise that we publish methodology & evidence with the conclusions?
    5
  8. You still haven’t provided any evidence that either pact exists.
    5
  9.  @rudacr  With the end of the Apollo missions there was no need to continue developing heavy launchers or manned vehicles that could travel beyond low orbit; the technology specific to those aspects became dated and eventually incompatible with modern technology and requirements, e.g, you couldn't use Apollo craft for building a moonbase. People who can't handle that concept think there were simply files containing blueprints that were expunged worldwide.
    5
  10.  @tdmfragplayz2287  Mostly delusion.
    5
  11. Jubilee cut the evidence out.
    5
  12. How do you think the ancient Greeks were using green screens?
    5
  13.  @syarifairlangga4608  They are the normal lenses; you’re assuming fisheye solely because the horizon is curved. That is why I asked the question.
    5
  14. You still haven’t explained why the Earth being a globe would cause all that.
    5
  15. Owen Heart Conservation of momentum; they were moving with the Earth before they were launched and consequently continue moving with it. They don’t require fuel once in orbit; there is no resistance to their movement. Meteorites are the meteors that landed and are recoverable. How did they get through the dome?
    5
  16. There's 3hrs missing in which the scientists provide evidence and the FE'ers still none. Motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses - all observable by any FE'er and yet unexplained by none. Do you want to try?
    5
  17.  @Globeishoaxx  We tell you how the ancient Greeks deduced it and how you can confirm it all for yourself. You keep dodging questions.
    5
  18. The definition of planet was changed.
    5
  19. They don’t.
    5
  20.  @Globeisahoax  How difficult is it for you to understand which way arrows point on a diagram?
    5
  21.  @KangenAlec  You haven't provided any examples of that yet. You've had months; having problem locating some?
    5
  22. Open minded means the willingness to listen & consider alternative ideas, not just believe anything that us different. We listen, we consider, we reject what is crap.
    5
  23.  @Globehoax  Funny they all occur in the high northern latitudes and make sense on a globe. Meanwhile we are still waiting on FE’er explanations for direct flights between southern continents.
    5
  24. About a 1000 years after the ancient Greeks deduced it. You’re referring to the shift from geocentric to heliocentric system.
    5
  25. You’re trying to scam those who can’t figure out elevation has a role unless it is spelt out to them and who think an unsupported identification of a mountain is indisputable.​ @the_flat_earth_warriorz 
    5
  26. Motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses. That’s how the ancient Greeks deduced the Earth is a globe. 2500 years on we are still waiting on FE’ers to explain.
    5
  27. Scientific theory & law are two different things. Law is a description of a natural phenomenon, typically describing a mathematical relationship between the relevant factors, but says nothing of how it works. Theory is the explanations for how the phenomenon works; an established theory is well-substantiated by extensive evidence (facts), consistent with all evidence and all other possibilities have been eliminated. It should not be confused with the vernacular meaning of theory; scientific theories are not guesses or hunches. It's that confusion you are referring to.
    5
  28.  @Globeishoax  Yet again doofus, 23.4 degrees.
    5
  29. Be prepared for a long wait.
    5
  30. It’s you who says that; we keep correcting you.
    5
  31. Try actually reading full sentences and thinking before posting.
    5
  32.  @KangenAlec  If they can’t get through your dome how would anybody know what is beyond? Why can FE’ers never agree on whether there is or isn’t a dome or if there is it isn’t anything beyond?
    5
  33. Water is inanimate; it can’t find anything. It moves purely according to the forces acting upon it. What do you think would pull it off the globe?
    5
  34.  @joshuaseabrook9835  You can see the effect of curvature of objects passing over the horizon, e.g., the sun rising & setting every day and only mountain tops being visible from a significant distance. Smaller objects can pass beyond the limit of your visual acuity long before they reach the horizon which is why FE'ers talk about zooming a boat back into view but never try it with sun & mountains. How far you can see depends on curvature, elevation (observer & object) and atmospheric refraction, not curvature alone. The equation you refer to is a rule of thumb for geometric drop, much beloved by FE'ers because it is simple, possess only one variable and gives the wrong answers. That it is a parabolic equation and is never going to describe a circle doesn't faze them nor the fact that it doesn't take into account elevation & refraction, hence the wrong answers. The actual calculations are not simple; see separate comment in case YT takes exception to website names. I would note that the ancient Greeks deduced the Earth's shape from the motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles and solar eclipses always having a circular shadow; all verifiable by anybody, all indicative of a sphere, all disproving the earth is flat and all unexplained by FE'ers.
    5
  35. Editing is permissible provided the content is not misrepresented. Adding boxes or arrows is necessary and permissible. Clipping to present an ROI clearly is necessary & permissible. Overlaying single-wavelength images to obtain a full colour image is necessary & permissible. Rendering an image in false colour is necessary and permissible. Stitching together images to create a panorama is necessary & permissible. Don’t lecture people on what you don’t understand.
    5
  36. Double standards are routine in this challenging established science.
    5
  37.  @Globeisahoaxx  You have yet to produce any evidence that everything is being faked. Why not try doing to that first?
    5
  38. How does the angle to Polaris match latitude? Why do laser gyroscope show 15 degree per hour motion? How does stellar parallax occur?
    5
  39. If science is wrong then how are you communicating?
    5
  40. Observation & deduction. That you don’t know how is your ignorance not your knowledge.
    5
  41.  @Globehoax  Why can’t you answer the question? Why can’t you answer any questions?
    5
  42. The guy who can’t answer any questions is still trying to claim he’s intelligent?
    5
  43. In common with other people of that time, the writers of the OT assumed the Earth to be flat simply because it looked so; though the Bible says nothing specifically that assumption is reflected in how some things were phrased. There are people who believe adopting such archaic beliefs because they feel it makes them closer the religious truth. Curiously they don’t advocate animal sacrifice.
    5
  44.  @Globeisahoax  And yet we can readily explain everything while you are incapable of answering the simplest questions.
    5
  45. You don’t need to know how something works for it to exist.
    5
  46. And don’t do either.
    5
  47.  @Globeisahoax  Still waiting on your explanation for how perspective would make anything disappear from the bottom up.
    5
  48.  @Globeisahoaxx  Yet again dumbo, the Gleason projection is a projection of the globe. It says so on it; can’t you read?
    5
  49. Ostensibly someone who asks about evidence and mechanisms when presented with an assertion, eg, scientists. People like FE’ers claim they are critical thinkers to avoid considering evidence & mechanisms, and to make unfounded assertions that critical thinking would reveal the holes in them.
    5
  50.  @Globeishoaxx  You’re the most prolific poster; how much are you being paid and by whom?
    5