Comments by "sharper68" (@sharper68) on "The Damage Report" channel.

  1. What are you talking about, how is it a dictatorship when there are a range of views on this. Pretending Anna is anti trans in a face of monsters that overtly want to ban their existence is poorly focused. Pretending she should not be talking to anyone on the right or engaging at all is idiotic. You seem pretty triggered about "what they have done" but it seems like you just want to attack them and do not actually care about this issue. No one sane has any real issues with Anna and Cenk on this issue, if you do then you are either cutting off your nose to spite your face or are dishonest and actually stand with the Jorden Peterson's of the world. Your spin is disgusting and empowers the monsters you pretend to oppose, this show is not a problem for Trans people in a country that is full of monsters actually attacking them and the birthing person controversy is really silly. Your spin is pointless and is at best dopy, it actually empowers the cancer you feign opposition to.
    3
  2.  @Interglacial_optimist  The second amendment has distinct limits. You are not advocating for it as it is applied in our system. Read the second and get back to me.
    3
  3. Why not? They compare universal health care to communism.
    3
  4. He is overtly harmfully racist. Pretending they have the same issue you are cool with is stupid. Calling someone racist means something that has nothing to do causal base racism inherit in everyone.
    3
  5. 93214919321491 Why take that bullshit? I would have shredded that asshole myself if I was there for him being dick. There is no reason she has to bow her head and smile through his ignorance and bigotry. The coffee place did the right thing.
    3
  6. Vaccine mandates in Canada are over 50 years old. You have needed "Jabs" to go to school in Canada since the 80's. Was Canada tyrannical in 2018? If you answer yes; you are a moron. If you answer no: you just owned yourself. History does not appear to be your thing.
    3
  7.  @peterpain6625  Pretty old school, with 8 of them what are the chances one is gay?
    3
  8. Canada is much closer and less genocidal. I personally am not cool with my friends bullying those far less powerful until the bullied are forced to feebly fight back.
    3
  9. She is carrying them to attract the ammo-sexuals that voter her in.
    3
  10.  @bomblade15  She should tell her husband, I would imagine she would care what he thinks. But she should be no more forced to do so than he should be forced to report jacking off into a tissue. One would think in a healthy relationship it would not even be a question if she told her partner about it. The only time I imagine her avoiding telling him is attached to the fact they were already messed up as a couple. The answer is she probably should, that being said she should not be compelled to. Not understanding why she would not means I have a hard time justifying forcing her to do so.
    3
  11.  @bomblade15  I was just responding to your statement, I pointed out I agree she should tell him. But the next sentence of your spin is often she should be forced to. I know you did not say husbands should have a say. My assertion is that the husband should have no recourse in demanding she do anything medical. You can agree or disagree on that statement, even if you did not say it in the first place. I have no issue forcing men to help support the children they father. I see no reason the mother alone or society should bear the cost of their choices. That men can not demand woman get or not get an abortion does not absolve them from the societal responsibility for helping pay for any living breathing children they father. Defending dead beats and losers who do not take responsibility for their own actions has ZERO value to society. It marks you as failure, both as a man and a responsible adult.
    3
  12.  @bomblade15  And she most certainly should, the parent rasing the child should get support from the parent that does not. If they both care for the child 50/50 no one should be obliged to support anyone. The fact is at one time only men ever paid alimony or child support. It is only in recent years that fathers who raise the child gets the same support from the mother once paid by only men.
    3
  13.  @bomblade15  Was not long ago woman had few rights at all and were basicly property of first their fathers then their husbands. Anyone that knows and likes a woman should be happy these changes occurred.
    3
  14.  @Yourdeadmeat69  The whole thing is bizzare out of touch wishful insurlar theater.
    3
  15.  @Yourdeadmeat69  Deeply dislikeable cretin.
    3
  16.  @majorlazor5058  What you said!
    3
  17. They have had people like this for a long long time, we have had people attached to ad campaigns that became famous for being in them. Attacking the generation as pathetic seems odd being if we had the same tech back in the day the exact same thing would have happened. This seems a pretty blind way to pump up your own ego and it is unwarranted.
    3
  18. The most violent are consistently right wing.
    3
  19.  @Wolfsheim23  The right is entirely driven by emotion. Pants shitting fear and the following hatred buried under asserted ignorance are your motivating forces. Pretending the group that possesses psychotic fact free fundamentalist snowflakes is the rational non emotional side is deeply stupid.
    3
  20. Got good views in a day. There is clearly still people that are interested in this untalked about subject.
    3
  21.  @1neAdam12  You are the one making the charge, share it so I can tear your spin apart. Your counter factual view of history is actually pretty Nazi in it's focus on the demonization of visible minorities. Bigoted fascists love to punch down, it is because they are are weak. Let's hear what you got.
    3
  22.  @Caceraann  Because what he is doing is not technically illegal. He is scamming people, but much like a televangelist his method is not against the law.
    3
  23. Cheney bringing in money should not be surprised. She is an establishment shill, the yahoo's running against them are fringe dwellers who culture warriors that scare the chamber of commerce types as they are unknown quantities.
    3
  24. As you sit beside fucking nazis your spin looks extra stupid. You clowns are the shallow end of the gene pool.
    3
  25. She does not know what shadow ban means ..
    3
  26. It shows a level of bias and manufactured consent that is innate to his empty platitude campaign. Pointing out when the media props up a candidate is news and I see no reason to bury it. The media attempting building up false support for Pete is important to the race, he is number #2.
    3
  27.  @Comrade_Jason  Every story does not have to be the most important. Did they say it was? I would argue it is news worthy and it is worth noting a front runner has to manufacture applause to appear popular..
    3
  28. Dumber than you even imagined ... she is not playing a part, she is actually this simple
    3
  29. They also hate the the words Bonjour, Hola, Salve, any word that extends greetings in a foreign tongue is obviously a blasphemy that should be banned from being taught to vulnerable children by law. There is no bottom to the level of ignorance these people fight for.
    3
  30. You appear to be asshole, some killings have a place. We should consider removing people with no sense of empathy.
    3
  31. The only divison it would create is within the cultists. It was an oversight. They regularly show their whole ass. In thr end it will change nothing, because maga voters are not actually principled
    3
  32. Only to establishment boot lickers like you.
    3
  33. As is correct, who wants to give their money to a proven sociopathic stain.
    3
  34. She is too old to conceive.
    3
  35.  @larryneville1811 If you are still talking about that, you are the freak. News flash the crisis is long over. We are discussing another subject sparky
    2
  36. I see that as good personally ...
    2
  37. Freedom for whatever their heart desires and also for the law to crush anyone they dislike.
    2
  38. And her policy is objectively bad as established.
    2
  39. Inhuman
    2
  40.  @Interglacial_optimist  I am inclined to agree that these crimes are grave. I opposed them as implemented would advocate we prosecute them according to law. When you start pretending insurrection is a lessor crime you are killing the patient to cure it and would only end up with far worse.
    2
  41. They do, treat woman as property.
    2
  42. Ignoring health care restrictions actually causes deaths, saying don't be an asshole and openly wave your hate flag is just common sense. Your priorities are clearly exposed here, they are fucking ugly!
    2
  43.  @voooduvooodu6032  No he pointed out he is part of the problem.
    2
  44.  @kathleenr4047  It is a bizarre up is down state of affairs'. I am surprised everyone does not see through it.
    2
  45. Nice work defending monsters that threaten others overt their feelings. You are very likely the kind of asshole that does this. Fucking hateful snowflakes!
    2
  46. I could not care less how you or anyone else identifies. The idea I might be mad at someone choosing to call themselves something nonstandard does not make any sense to me. My rule is try not to be an asshole, if someone wants to be called "x" I will try to accommodate them. It costs me NOTHING.
    2
  47. All he did was wave around his sword and threaten another American with it, nothing to see here move along.
    2
  48. Fake progressive? What is fake about calling her out on acting like a member of the GOP when one is actually progressive? We have a choices in this campaign and do not have compromise on our first vote to please some group who thinks it is their turn to win. We have candidates with out her list of problems in the mix and I see no reason to ignore these issues to make a group Tulsi or bust boosters (like 20 of you) happy.
    2
  49. More likely their parents or those who are at real risk.
    2
  50.  Long duk dong  This is a dupe who parrots lies of monsters that would step over his families bodies for a nickel. These docs are a couple clowns who became popular with the anti science crowd a while ago. They are well known for spitting this same spin really early. They appear to be more interested in making cash than acting like doctors. His pointing to this as an example of doctors agreeing with his spin is plainly cherry picked nonsense as the vast majority do not. The only useful information a reference to these guys gives us is that we should not trust any source he cites without a thorough vetting. Thankfully for us these dangerous quacks represent a tiny fraction of professional medical opinion.
    2