Comments by "Yester Vue" (@yestervue4697) on "Johnny Harris"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Full Definition of theory
1 : a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena the wave theory of light
2a : a belief, policy, or procedure proposed or followed as the basis of action her method is based on the theory that all children want to learn
b : an ideal or hypothetical set of facts, principles, or circumstances —often used in the phrase in theory in theory, we have always advocated freedom for all
3a : a hypothesis assumed for the sake of argument or investigation
b : an unproved assumption : conjecture
c : a body of theorems presenting a concise systematic view of a subject theory of equations
4 : the general or abstract principles of a body of fact, a science, or an art music theory
5 : abstract thought : speculation
6 : the analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another
Sorry...you lied here is the copy-paste right from the dictionary definition. Notice the heavy application of the words ~assumption, speculation, assumption, theorized, theoretical, hypothesis...
You need to take some reading comprehension classes son. it does NOT mean the fact it indeed definitely actually does mean a guess, a shot in in the dark, a speculative assumption, nothing more than a fucking so-called "educated geuss"! You are wrong.
I started investigating things I questioned in the '9-'s and my first two children were born after I was married and then the internet went public. My first PC experience was a Commodore 64...Goole it if you have never heard of it. I was here doing this before the internet in other words...what's your seasoning and experience delving into the riddles of modern science? I have REALLY been at this for decades...what's your experience time frame here on this topic? Or do you just like all the others here always try and do serious debate recalling only high school science classes and quick Google searches in between grammatically disastrous posts with one or two sentences? The reality is obvious and I know what it is I just want you to say it for everyone else to see...you are in over your head. You a gamer? I get mostly arguments from the kids who think life is whatever the screen puts between their ears.
Now that we have established through the truth that indeed it truly is guessing let's move on to the rest that is STILL THEORIES, UNPROVEN SPECULATIONS, GUESSES, ASSUMPTIONS LIKE THE REST OF THEM LABELED AS THEORY STILL TODAY.
Let's move on to showing they ARE actually still called theories because...THEY ARE!
Germ THEORY...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germ_theory_of_disease
Atomic THEORY...
https://en.wikipedia.org
/wiki/Atomic_theory
Heliocentric THEORY...
https://www.britannica.com/science/heliocentrism
Shall I go on? The facts are right...you are not...there is more to post on every single theory I mentioned being indeed just guessed only.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@InitiateDee
"I" didn't post or say anything of my own inventions or opinions, but YOU did...I posted exactly what the dictionary says and it says what I said it said and NOT what you said it would say...you can't change the now ages-old super well-established definitions, they are what they are.
Your lack of experience shines through...thus the mention of mine and my experiences/time at the writer/researcher's helm.
After the completion of your public school indoctrination, in the adult world-life on your own (assuming you are over 18 but I feel that might be a stretch) have you ever once sat down, and out of your own genuine curiosity, actually read like 800-12,00 pages of research material and publications, watched dozens of hours researching video footages/actual observations, weeks of hours-long chat sessions talking with others in like-minded individuals in a collective research group, and written or had anything published rooted in that researching? I have...you are a newbie nobody who apparently struggles to comprehend what you read...so your "inexperience and lack of any real verifiable information" you've actually personally looked up/researched is hurting you in active debate yes. You shoot from the hip with every comment, only can say/repeat what others told you, not what you have actually truthfully investigated yourself, and so you flail and fail in a debate like that. I would rather duck out and shut up than keep shoving my foot deeper and deeper down my own throat out of ignorance and bullheadedness trying to outlast truth and fight through on sheer resistance. I will still slay you with the well-known, ages-old, established many times over through genuine scientific method in the days of the real "empirical" scientists before the great deception of the introduction of theoretical sciences that stopped relying on facts called "consensus science".
Do some real due diligence and actually investigate the difference between empirical and consensus science. There is a vast difference and that is one relies on proven facts to make a statement, the other replies on making statements that everyone collectively agrees could be the truth. Radically different as one is fact-based, the other is entirely speculative guessing. Today we stopped using empirical science and everything in your life, medicine, science, schools, society, etc. is all built on THEORIES! Project paperclip flipped America. You just can't see that through lack of experience and total absence of any investigative research whatsoever to back any statement you make.
You are actually helping me outgun you in this exchange...
I used to think just like you...I took every single class I could in science in high school so in my senior year I could only occupy myself with self-interest-oriented reading and research as I had taken every single science elective already and none were left. I "worshipped" science, believed every single thing they told me too as you do...then started digging deeper than my textbooks explained and saw the real world.
I was deceived in school and it was clear when I started looking on my own outside of the "approved curriculum".
You are still in your infancy with this and it shows...sorry it is true. You are putting stuff nearly verbatim at times with what is in the mainstream literature access materials. Do you even really know where to find actual honest real scientific literature? And when/if you do, as you click the first few links provide on a topic...you firmly believe every bit of it on the public mainstream internet is the truth? You don't believe for one second you have been deceived or lied to about anything ever anywhere in the history of your life by your "powers that be"? If you do..then YOU are indeed the fool in the mix and as mentioned...a used car salesman's wet dream!
You'll believe ANYTHING I put on a screen and just because the government put it out you think it is the gospel truth!
Your kind is the reason the sucky things about life in the world we have to deal with suck so much.
The continual reproduction and power breeding of concerted and by design total ignorance!
A nation of citizens who never question anything takes anything the government tells them is healthy is actually healthy, pays whatever they tell them to in taxes, thinks that they are always there protecting them and not just protecting the establishment and enforcing control of all knowledge and information...you are a good sheep.
Grow a set and start questioning what you read and stop JUST reading it. Ask, inquire, keep learning daily and get your head out of the PC games occasionally. Your view of the world is a screen, you have a screen between your ears.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here...for the exceptionally thick...here is some real science, physics, and good old-fashioned logic!!! Stick this in your globe and smoke it!
I will attach a picture even for more clarity.
https://i.stack.imgur.com/ge9sN.png
Now, these are the terms we will use (listed/outlined on the diagram) so as to completely comply with "known sciences of air flight" and the terminology actually used by pilots all over the earth, so you cannot say I am saying something/referencing something incorrectly.
Now when you take off in an aircraft from the flat level ground, and you want to gain altitude after becoming airborne, you have absolutely no other option but to adjust the "pitch" of the craft so as to point the nose of the craft at an angle to whatever desired degree/angle/speed you wish until the craft reached whatever desired altitude ( altitude representing the distance measured from the craft to the flat, level, ground in whatever measured unbit you use/speak in) to achieve this result...physics mandates it.
Now when you reach said altitude, you will have to readjust the pitch of the plane to bring the fuselage to a level orientation (would be measured at 0 degrees pitch or completely level in relation to the flat surface of the earth...following me? Don't say no or you have got to be extremely stupid...)
Now once you are flying along at the desired altitude, and your craft has leveled off and is now maintaining altitude only..as in NOT climbing/gaining altitude, OR descending/losing altitude...you cannot maintain 0 degrees pitch in cruising altitude flight and stay at that same altitude continuously, and the altitude makes no difference whether 10,000 ft or 10 ft.
So as the supposedly "known/measured/calculatable curvature" of a global earth model would mandate according to..."science"...the continually curving earth surface would soon start to descend/drop/curve downward before you and quite noticeably (as the curve calculates to something like 8" per mile of drop over distance in any direction on a ball/sphere) in your direction of flight no matter where on earth you flew.
You would reach a point where you were slowly gaining altitude and thus "climbing out of the atmosphere and proceeding into space" as a result of the ground "falling away" in angle before your direction of flight.
Physics mandates without argument that as that occurred you would be forced to adjust the pitch of the craft at a downward attitude (point the nose down or descend/lose altitude to maintain 10k ft or whatever altitude you flew) or you would WIND UP LEAVING THE EARTH AND ENTERING THE OUTER ATMOSPHERE SLOWLY ASCENDING CONTINUALLY UPWARD INTO SPACE.
You absolutely cannot circumvent a sphere or globe of any size in any direction whatsoever in any type of aircraft without using a curved flight path in relation to maintaining a constant altitude over thousands of linear miles in distance as you traverse the surface of the earth.
Now, where is that wrong? How does that inarguable representation of physics in play make me the idiot and you smart?
Now you look stupid believing in a globe when you really think about it don't you? Welcome to reality!!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1