General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Yester Vue
Johnny Harris
comments

Comments by "Yester Vue" (@yestervue4697) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

Previous
9
Next
...
All

@MrSirhcsellor You do understand we fly planes with "physics" right? And all throughout that whole pitch...I talked about PLANES, right? (I nor anyone else have never seen a plane that operates on geometry...sorry) The representation of a "PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF FLIGHT" (that'd be the "physics" part there) was used to point out the ""OBVIOUS GEOMETRY OF THE EARTH" (and there's YOUR geometry...follow that ok?...You get that right?) Or should I repeat it and go slower?
1
@MrSirhcsellor if you're talking about the exact scale in comparison to the exact measurements of the earth yes that would be an exact calculation but you're entirely missing what I said.
1
@MrSirhcsellor the point I'm making is that you cannot fly in a perfectly level angle at zero degrees pitch indefinitely on any sphere of any size at all anywhere in the known physical universe. on a small sphere the pitch of downward attitude you adjust the plane to compensate for the curve of the horizon falling away from you to maintain the same altitude would obviously be greater than pitch you would have to use to adjust around a massive sphere as in the sun. but the size of the sphere or the craft have absolutely no bearing on the fact that you cannot fly over a curved horizon that continually graduates downward in front of you without continually adjusting the attitude of the aircraft you're in to also match that same continual downward angle and thus you cannot fly along any sphere no matter the size in any craft no matter the size and maintain a set altitude continually around that sphere without ever pointing the nose of the aircraft down. That's simple physics cannot be argued with it cannot be changed no matter how you explain it you can't go around a curve with a straight line same concept. Therefore my question was does anybody know a licensed pilot? Because if they do they could ask them how often they have to pitch the playing downward to adjust for the horizon falling away as they travel along in a transcontinental flight whether it be a thousand miles or 6,000 mi is irrelevant the distance doesn't matter you would still have to keep pitching the plane downward as you saw the horizon fall away and downward in front of you and that is a law of physics you cannot traverse a curve in a radius with a straight line
1
@MrSirhcsellor Because THAT is what I have repeatedly stated across several accounts along this same string of conversations for two days now. My point was to have anyone that knows a pilot and enquire whether they actually do have to adjust pitch to compensate for the curvature...because they do not at all. So if they don't how is the earth spherical? I missed a decimal and had meant to type .8" and did actually state it as an approximation and never gave the statement as even hinted as "chiseled in granite this exact angle proves my point? and that is how the whole conversation was made to feel toward me. These WHOLE two days has been a running debate over the geometry of earth...always and the exact angle of the pitch a plane would have to make to follow the radius of a round globe really absolutely matters not the slightest bit at all in that conversational context, the point is that for a globe you wold HAVE TO make adjustments.
1
@MrSirhcsellor One sentence statement repeating my point... PILOTS DO NOT EVER ADJUST PITCH TO COMPENSATE FOR THE SUPPOSED CURVE OF THE EARTH.
1
@Matuse SLOWLY READ THIS WHOLE THING BEFORE ANSWERING AGAIN, YOU ARENT EVEN ON TOPIC MAN! THE CONVERSATION WAS ABOUT FLIGHT PATHS AND NOT GRAVITY...AT ALL, EVER, NOT ONCE, YOU GUYS ARE TRYING TO "MAKE IT" AN ARGUMENT ABOUT GRAVITY!!! WE HAVE IT, IT IS HERE, WE AAAAAAALLLLLLLLLL KNOW THAT!!!!! NO ONE IS SAYING WE DON'T! I ABSOLUTELY NEVER SAID WE DO NOT! SO READ SLOWLY, VERY, VERY, SLOWLY, GOOGLE WORDS THAT GO OVER YOUR HEAD IF NEED BE BUT THIS TIME TAKE IN THE WHOLE CONVERSATION BEFORE FLYING ACROSS THE KEYBOARD ONE SENTENCE INTO IT/TAKING PART OUT OF CONTEXT AND SEE EXACTLY HOW ~STUPID~ YOUR ANSWER LOOKED SAYING THAT IN REPLY TO MY QUESTION WHICH WAS NEVER AT ALL ARGUING PRO/CON GRAVITY!!!!!!!!!!!! READ SLOWLY. THIS TIME, UNDERSTAND THE ARGUMENT ENTIRELY THERE MR. HALF COCKED! USE A DICTIONARY, CONSULT A FRIEND AND GET BACK TO ME...WHATEVER YOU NEED TO DO TO COMPREHEND THIS DEBATE BUT TALK ABOUT ONLY WHAT I AM ASKING...NOT WHAT YOU "THINK" I AM SAYING You guys really struggle with reading comprehension man...it's like never-ending with you all... My personal favorites are the ones that spend two days telling me "what they think " to in a very pissy statement close the conversation with "Well I don't care what you think..." I once again repeat the very same question you yourself can go back and read it, it is ALL over paragraph after many, many paragraphs here...I am not gonna dig it out to compensate for you guys flying right over it and missing it continually will repeat the question, then the applied logic used to resolve the problem, and then back off again and let you stick both feet in your mouth yourself...you all are the best and easiest to do this too! The question was...DOES ANYONE KNOW A PILOT? IF YOU DO ASK THEM WHAT THE KNOWN ANGLE OF PITCH IS THAT AN AIRCRAFT MUST MAINTAIN TO FOLLOW THE CURVATURE OF THE GLOBE AND THUS MAINTAIN A CONSTANT ELEVATION ON A TRANSATLANTIC FLIGHT. Never was any different, over and over I even repeated this. Now here is the logic I repeatedly try to get you all to apply, failing miserably but still I tired ONLY THIS! DRAW A CIRCLE ON A PIECE OF PAPER, AND NEXT TO THAT DRAW A STRAIGHT LINE, NOW IN ANY ORIENTATION, YOU WISH...HOW LONG CAN YOU MAKE THE TWO, A CURVED LINE AND A STRAIGHT LINE RUN PARALLEL TO ONE ANOTHER. A flight path at zero degrees pitch will eventually fly off the earth...even with gravity functioning perfectly. At no instance no matter how hard you all try to "warp" physics to make it fit in your head...curved lines can never make a corner navigatable. For an experiment you can easily do if you have a car is this...try all you want to, but you will never turn a car through a corner in a straight line. You're on! take it away!!!!
1
@Matuse Where did you go? All the globe trotters are counting on you... don't let them down now! The internet trolling society of the~ "Attack All Flat Earthers with anything even stupidity but just for God's sake please attack them relentlessly!!" ~organization is about to begin...and they were really counting on you making me look like a moron with that statement...follow up on this dude! Finish me off already...they are all watching and waiting with bated breath!!!!
1
@phildavenport4150 ...do better than that man...I got this in 3 seconds...FIRST link on the page! Next question? This is GLOBALLY known like is it just coming to light for you? Did you REALLY never know that to get on "onto" Antarctica you have to get up on a shelf wall of ice that is...taller than ships even! Man, where the hell do you guys keep your head buried? https://duckduckgo.com/?q=antartica+ice+wall&t=newext&atb=v244-1&iax=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fplanetruthblog.files.wordpress.com%2F2016%2F05%2Fice-wall-7.jpg&ia=images
1
@phildavenport4150 I could post a gazillion but you can use yer own lazy fingers and do it faster than can copy-paste them...and the pictures are in the thousands! You guys got anything like..tough to answer? maybe stuff that isn't in plain sight but you never "look at the man behind the curtain" like ins Oz and just believe blindly whatever someone else tells you?
1
0 for 6!
1
@Lee.S..B OK, sorry I have about 12 conversations going on simultaneously here with all of you same time! One sec...lemme upload a couple sketches into the PC and I will be back!
1
@jeebus2313 dean johns dean johns 13 hours ago Pilot for 30 years earth is flat. Flight school trains u to navigate flat earth. [FACT] Look, it is on this very page...from a PILOT!!!!
1
...ha ha...YOU guys claim that?...here, riddle me this... Can an object cast a shadow of itself, larger than the object casting the shadow? ~and~ Can an object cast a shadow of itself, smaller than the object casting the shadow? You can even not only look this up quite easily...you can take a flashlight and prove this yourself in a dark room! Get a round object that casts a circular shadow onto the wall just like the moon supposedly does in an eclipse on the earth's surface that is easily held in one hand, and a flashlight. Now do just that in a dark room, make a "shadow puppet" like casting of the object onto the wall. Now take that flashlight and make it further and closer, from behind the object and see if the shadow can be made bigger or smaller than the object casting the shadow. And by shadow, that means with clean edges clearly visible just like with a shadow puppet...or an eclipse. This is basic grade school crap right here...answer this and this "very well-known" science FACT will absolutely disprove something you were taught in the heliocentric theories' model of the "solar systeM'...makes me chuckle to say that! And it is this fact NOT ME doing it so don't get all defensive about the outcome of the experiment! This experiment will expose a lie you have been told over and over! It will be obvious when you do the experiment..good luck!
1
@Chandler Burse Show me...I keep asking. I get words... For years now that's it. Begged for evidence and all I get is name calling and shitty attitudes... If this world is a sphere there should be solid evidence yes? That's all I'm asking for...
1
@Chandler Burse PS I reproduced very well documented experiments that are over 100 years old they're already recorded in the scientific literature they've already been done in the past and they have been buried and hidden and replaced theories instead of real physical evidence. No one can produce a single shred of evidence that has any real solid proof this Earth is a spherical object floating in space as described by theoretical scientist. No one can get over the word theoretic theoretical and what it means.... Can't change the definition of words and what they meant for hundreds of years to fit a narrative and that's exactly what's been done. Everything about this plane was already figured out by about 1910 and then all the sudden shows up Einstein and all these theoretical scientists and they completely put a real verifiable empirical science into the shadows and I placed it all with ideologies and imaginations and that's all the theories are. Not a single theory has ever been proven so are they still are called theories and not facts because they have failed in some instances for thousands of years as in heliocentrism to ever provide a single shred of evidence. We get flooded with a tsunami of words trying to convince us that this world is in a heliocentric model but there's not a single shred of hardcore real physical evidence in existence. I have called the world out and beg for any of this evidence and every single soul has failed to produce anything outside of insults and name calling. It's now a decades long endeavor I've been at this since the 80s I didn't start this yesterday. There's no proof in existence I'm daring anyone to post it because it doesn't exist tried looking for decades.
1
@Adizzyizzy sure just prove it with real evidence? I mean seriously don't place up calculations and endless streams of explanations put up a real observable scientific experiment that anyone can go reproduce to prove gravity is real. Ball dropping doesn't produce that truth because I can show you someone floating the 300 lb anvil in a tub of Mercury. In fact you can go look that up yourself right here in this YouTube platform go type in anvil floating in Mercury. We don't live in a world of gravity we live in a world of density that's why a 300-lb handbook will float in a puddle of Mercury like a stick on water. Gravity is a theory go look it up in the literature it's called theory everywhere and a theory means it's unproven and that's what it's meant for the entire history of science. Not fact it's an ideology it's an estimate it's a guess it's an imagining and no more
1
@milkmankarlson3043 no you said a bunch of words that's all anybody puts up... Words prove nothing words is how they use influence to get people to follow a religion through faith as Faith requires no proof just your belief that is true this is a religion not a science you believe in
1
@SpinDuality they fly wonderfully in this enclosed system that there's pressure to push against thus enabling flight through any form of propulsion in our enclosed atmosphere. Problem is you can't fly outside of our atmosphere and no one ever has... You can look at that evidence yourself by going and finding every single video of every rocket ever shot off into space it's supposedly. Everyone goes straight up makes a big arcing curve and points right back down and go straight back down to the ground and not a single video you can find shows a rocket going straight up in a straight line and out of sight into space because none are capable. Good luck to see yourself they all go up big arcing turn and then fly straight back down go look yourself and see it
1
@solitaregames no you won't go look at footage taken from a private plane how do you real flat window that doesn't have a fisheye lens effect. All the windows next to the seats on every commercial aircraft are bubble-shaped to give it a fisheye lens effect when you look out of it.
1
@solitaregames here's a fact you can actually go look up in real scientific literature humans can't see further than a few miles before our line of sight converges to a point we use the ability to focus on a single point. If your theory were true you should be able to read a book by placing it on the opposite side of the room from you and sitting 30 feet away with nothing obstructing the pages from your line of sight. Please let me know how that science experiment works out
1
@chrispy5249 physics majors don't know anything they know what other people tell them. Scientists accumulate knowledge through experimentation people with degrees get handed a piece of paper stating they are very good at repeating the correct predetermined answers to a set of test questions it doesn't verify they're intelligent at all
1
@milkmankarlson3043 Yes it is. How would YOU define a religion? I'll show you..what is your answer to that question..." what does the word religion mean to you?"
1
@milkmankarlson3043 A "religion" is a belief system based on faith. To have faith in something you must believe it to be true beyond any hope of swaying your convictions even unto the face of death and you must show your conviction by remaining true in the face of opposition propoganda, based on...only the faith and no physical proof that is indisputable and clearly proves it to be the truth. Everyone who says they believe science argues against religion standing on that it bears no proof beyond books stating it is so carried by many people who faithfully follow that relgion. EVERYTHING in modern science is theoretical. Do not take anyone's word for it...go spend a few minutes looking something up for yourself and see it with your own eyes or you won't believe it. Atoms, Gravity, Heliocentrism, Germ, Virus, Quantum, etc., ALL these still are only theories. If they were ever once "proven" they would be labeled like "The Law of Evolution" in literature and it is forever called and will be forever called a "theory" as it has never revealed solid evidence to back it and must be accepted on persuasive talks and speculation alone. Now please explain how religion and theoretical science are NOT the same things? BOTH require your blind acceptance without question, based only on other people convincing you it is true, but never being able to prove it to you beyond a doubt. Question everything...ALL of it...
1
@milkmankarlson3043 Never mind... That also is proovably not true... And had been done so decades before I ever even became involved in the discussions about it. You can't just shoot from the hip like that on things you remember from public school that information was horrifically outdated when you read it out of a textbook and that's also provably true. If you spent one hour in true genuine research with the angle of an investigative reporter trying to discover it and the answer with a non-biased beginning... you'd blow your own mind with what you find. All you're really actually doing right now in real time is repeating things that other people told you sometime back in your history and you really actually have no genuine current up-to-date and thus up to speed information to use in an exchange like this. The things that a teacher dictated to you out of a textbook in a public school system was at the very least 15 years old when you read it. You can't even get an idea, go through the years of rigors it takes to get it verified as fact in the real legitimate scientific community, begin to allow professors to start instructing on that proven science and begin writing new textbooks about it, get them distributed throughout the nation, update all the public school teachers on the new information available, and get it funneled into your head in less than about 15 or 20 years. The stuff you were educated with is verifiably outdated by decades. Real research is going to give you some real information parroting things people told you is not intelligence and is definitely not thinking even remotely. You all put up these staunch fronts of refusal to even listen to an alternative explanation because of the broken record reply of the proof at hand and my lack of proof. The real and true definition of that statement in layman's terms is more like... "Look it's what everybody else has always believed, my parents believed it, my friends believe it, and it's what they taught me in school so it must be true. Has anyone ever actually shown me any proof of what they taught me? Does any actual genuine scientific observation conducted in my lessons for this instruction? Or was I just shown a bunch of pictures, artist renditions, pretty cool CGI, and a whole lot of words written in text in an ocean of books and I believe that on that with faith alone? Really think about what you're standing on as truth and reality... has anyone ever really honestly shown you anything that proved to you all of this you believe? Or are you just following the traditional social norms without questioning anything?
1
@milkmankarlson3043 ... Religion...
1
@milkmankarlson3043 see how you guys consistently every time you ask something and someone put something up that starts to prove something you immediately switch topics and turn the conversation away from the proof's being discussed? Pattern is so crazy consistent it blows my mind, I've been having these conversations like this with topics online since the internet was dialed up I know exactly what I'm talking about it's totally true. He grabbed a steering wheel and checked the conversation right away from that direction and verified by your intentional misdirection of the conversation that you feared going over the answer you just had asked me for... You're not brave enough to do this come back when you grow up some...
1
@solitaregames I looked "online only brave modern day pussy" up on the internet and swear to God it said go see @Solitare posts for greater clarity... Just thought you'd like to know...
1
@johnwotek3816 then then again I am ceaselessly endlessly perpetually begging for somebody to post anything other than a word-based reply or a mathematical calculation and you have done nothing more than repeating exactly what I am saying is the only response you guys have. If I walk you outside of my house and point at my truck and say see there's my truck! I showed you my truck I didn't just tell you I owned one. All you guys want me to do is believe the religious concept you guys keep repeating and expect me to take it on blind Faith only that is the definition of a religion. Again you failed all you did was add to the failures I am asking to be disproven with evidence you can see with your own eyes. Show me evidence like I have posted literally hundreds of hours of for over a year now in this chat stream it would take you probably a week to watch everything I have posted you can actually look at for proof. I'm not making a claim I'm not repeating step other people told me I'm not quoting mere words from a textbook I'm not backing anything up with calculations I'm putting up stuff you can actually see with your own eyes that contradicts and disproves everything you guys are saying in support of. You failed you guys just keep losing.,
1
@johnwotek3816 ...same reason oil and water stay separated at the same ground level...that also made you look super dumb saying that...seriously. Look up density...really, you seem to have not the slightest understanding of the concept even...(anvil not a 300lb handbook?) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhso-vemDZo According to the theory of gravity that anvil should sink...
1
@johnwotek3816 ...why do helium balloons rise then being heavier than air?...that destroys gravity...think about it real hard...
1
@johnwotek3816 ...you talk very uneducatedly...and then go on to prove it with every post...
1
dean johns dean johns 13 hours ago Pilot for 30 years earth is flat. Flight school trains u to navigate flat earth. [FACT] Look, it is on this very page...from a PILOT!!!!
1
Than or then? But anyway...here, it's ok to be wrong, many of us were also before we actually looked into things and quit just insulting people... dean johns dean johns 13 hours ago Pilot for 30 years earth is flat. Flight school trains u to navigate flat earth. [FACT] Look, it is on this very page...from a PILOT!!!!
1
The misconception all the quick draw judgers of those that believe the earth is not a sphere is the constant application of the phrases and derogatory comments about the "edges" of the earth, walking off it, so on so forth. None of us ever say that the earth is a round plate or a pancake shape...the deniers all do that. Not a single one of us thinks that but through a repetition of insulting phrases started years before they were even born they think it is what we believe. That is merely them trying to make a sphere just be smashed into a flattened object which would make it pancake-shaped...problem though is we never claimed that. It is your blinders that through generations of using that phrase they think it is us...you are merely expressing the effectiveness of the programming applied. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm7Mmnf_fHc&t=4s And ships never sail over the horizon...sorry that claim is dead now with modern photography...catch up with the times...the same old insults are more than a generation old and very outdated now. It makes them look very ignorant...
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 Well actually reading over what you just posted...I can't find anything I said. There's several sentences you wrote there, but nothing I said. Try again? I'll wait...
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 the goodbye see you later if you don't have time you don't have concern...
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 Nah Show me one picture of the whole earth taken from space then. You first....chose carefully too. (the whole "globe" in one shot...not composited made up in CGI) I'll wait...
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 And by the way...just out of curiosity who told you we think that the earth is round in any capacity? That's you all's a constant assumption that we see the earth as a globe made flat makes a pancake...we don't think that, never did, and you are just repeating the same old catchphrases that people were using for generations before you were born. Do you guys have ANY original material to work with? You in your small mind take a round ball and make it flattened...you are way out of alignment with what you are even talking about...That's like the shit my great grandparents would have heard...catch up...
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 Common I am also in about 12 conversations same time...keep up or quit wasting my time...
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 Hello???
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 And you absolutely know nothing...I know you can "repeat" things other people said for decades before you ever came along...but YOU? You have nothing to work with...you are just a parrot!
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 Well for krissakes...go away...you won't respond...bye!
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm7Mmnf_fHc&t=4s
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeTaQ4NXIkc
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 And tell me why if traveling along millions of miles an hour in an ever-expanding Milkyway in an ever-growing universe...we NEVER see the stars move locations? We should never see the same stars two nights in a row...EVER...and look up POLARIS...it never moves, like from the center of a big spinning...DOME? Hmm...kinda hard to write that off ain't it? But would love to hear your struggle with that...please enlighten us!
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm7Mmnf_fHc&t=4s
1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm7Mmnf_fHc&t=4s
1
@boterlettersukkel Physics is what I follow...not theories. All your entire platform of arguments are based on theoretical sciences...and that makes up what is called CONSENSUS SCIENCE". Lemme put that into layman's terms for you..."Hey guys, I got this idea..." = Theoretical Science and nothing more. Consensus Science = "All in favor say aye, all opposed say nay"...and the ayes have it and nothing more. Yet you worship it as fact...think about how foolish that actually looks. If i any of it was ever actually proven as fact it would stop being called THEORIES...yet all still are. Ever think about that? No, you respond like everyone did for decades before you came along and you just repeat the same stuff without thought...that makes you a parrot, not a thinker. You are standing on"ideas" as truth...arguing against people who are telling you their ideas, and you ridicule and insult them based on that. Now THAT is a definition of hypocrisy. You can leave anything as you wish...I don't have to.
1
@ronin_gthayc3020 No, it shows the illusion SOOOO many stand on here in constantly and continually saying over and over "then how come I can watch a ship disappear "over" the horizon then you idiot"? Well...this shows the truth and that is you can't, you never can. Know why? It is called perspective and the application of the vanishing point in a human field of vision. (you can google this one actually...try it) And the vanishing point for a human in relation to perspective is around 3-4 miles. So then if we are actually seeing an object still with zoom...how far away does it have to be to go over a curved horizon on a spherical planet? You do realize that we can see WAY further in distance to the left and the right looking at a ship disappear to us going away from us on the ocean standing on a beach...then how come we don't see the curve drop off to the left and right then? There is no curve is why...and your eyes can see that plainly, but you are so brainwashed they have you convinced your eyes are never to be trusted and that you need to be corrected on what you plainly see...THAT is a fools' response, not trusting your eyes.
1
@boterlettersukkel ...typical, that is how they all leave it...still unable to back anything except repeating insults people came up with generations before they were born. Not even any original thoughts...cool...bye
1

Previous
9
Next
...
All