Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "TLDR News EU"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
So, who are these "EU leaders", who are willing to force out a memberstate? Guess if they are as powerful, as you try to sell them to look like, they wouldnt hide in the shadows... also which "Rule of law" did Hungary went against? And if the EU funds are withold because of "Rule of Law" problems, then why would Orban get them, if he would agree to an unrelated security framework? That either means, there are no rule of law problems, in Hungary and this is only the idea to play games with a memberstate, or that the EU horsetrades the legal system to get a greenlight on some shady defense organization, which will be commaded by the same "EU leaders" who refuse to unmask themselves to the European public.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@btan3495 Sure, I noticed the pattern. Ukries are the good guys, so nothing bad can be said about them, thats the pattern. Even if you simphatyze with them or not, the task of the so called free press is not to spread the lies of their friends, but to tell the objective truth. Sure I know Soviet style propaganda, and I can tell ya, what western journalists do recently is way closer to that, than what Russian state news claiming. They are rational and level headed, while the west fabricating heroes and enemies, like the Soviets did.
1
-
@btan3495 I actually know the Budapest Memorandum's text pretty much, and its not that simple, that Ukraine gave up its nuclear stockpiles for recognition of their borders. First of all, even the Budapest Memorandum did talk about a popular referendum held in Crimea, about where it intends to belong, there was even a referendum ongoing in 1991, but Ukraine intervened with military force, and stopped it. Secondly Ukraine guaranteed Russia access to the Sevastopol military base indefinitely, which Juschenko basically completely ignored, and ordered Russians to leave. Thirdly both USA and Russia guaranteed, that they won't interfere in the internal politics of Ukraine, which was clearly breached, when Victoria Nuland, Secretary of state, personally chose in a captured phone call the new leader of Ukraine, from the Maidan revolters. Does that give explicit right for Russia to invade? No, but the international law was basically tattered even before the first Russian soldier set foot on Ukrainian ground.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1