General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Cole Behnke
TIKhistory
comments
Comments by "Cole Behnke" (@colebehnke7767) on "TIKhistory" channel.
Previous
15
Next
...
All
@TheHandsomeman Hitler didn’t have a painting of Ford, life size or not.
4
So when has any socialist state actually let unions be independent?
4
Uh, how?
4
@Gvjrapiro anyone who says a company being run by government officials is privatization doesn’t know that they are talking about.
4
What did he say that’s actually wrong?
4
@KeigoUmemura if you understand any bit of communist ideology you would know they try to create dictatorships.
4
I disagree, during and after the night of long knives a large number is socialists joined the Nazi party.
4
So how is he wrong?
4
@JuvianTV so basically he’s wrong because he disagrees with the WW2 propaganda and is trying to do the historians job of digging through the sources and considering their biases?
4
@JuvianTV I would love to hear of these sources that he smilingly ignores.
4
He doesn’t use the left right scale…
4
@MrDan557 the book, Hitler’s Beneficiaries, disagrees with you. Additionally what corporate oligarchy? The ones he replaced with his own people whom he had absolute control over? Don’t seem like a corporate oligarchy to me.
4
This was years before the war…
4
For the second one… don’t your notice how the more the government gets involved with the economy the more concentrated capital becomes?
4
Socialism is not the democratization of the workplace.
4
What are you talking about?
4
@davebeha5365 how so?
3
@Jenseduca dam your really hung up on the materialism thingy.
3
@BorkDoggo I mean he did point it out, otherwise you would have never known, so he did do his job correctly. And what narrative is he pushing by changing that? He already believes that fascism is socialism.
3
@BorkDoggo so my argument clearly went over your head. TIK has made it abundantly clear that in his opinion, that fascism is a form of socialism, so why would he change it from fascism to socialism if they were the same thing?
3
@BorkDoggo TIK believes that Marxism, Fascism, and Nazism are all three distinct socialist ideologies. He explains this later in the video. TIK’s change was a simple correction, if the guy was talking about Nazis and called them Marxists he would do the same thing.
3
Any actual arguments?
3
Do you have any evidence for your clams that that was the Nazis motives, because to be it just seems like you are baselessly ascribing intents that they never actually expressed themselves like your some kind of time traveling mind reader.
3
@brucebutler2746 There just is no evidence that can’t also be used to describe them as socialist, while you have to ignore tons of evidence to declare them not socialist.
3
@brucebutler2746 I tend to find that most socialists don’t know what the definition of socialism is. Have you ever heard of Utopian Socialism?
3
As opposed to what?
3
Dam, TIK made a more recent video addressing those arguments.
3
@galaxy9radio664 except that is exactly the opposite of what we see.
3
@galaxy9radio664 what I see right now is the government doing everything it can to siphon wealth from the young to the old, democracy at work.
3
@rustyshackleford735 there’s nothing about corporatism that makes it incompatible with socialism, and the Nazis definitely weren’t controlled by the economic elite.
3
What misinformation does it spread exactly?
3
@hobbso8508 what's the definition of socialism that he ignored half of?
3
@Harrier_DuBois considering that TIK is a historian...
3
@hobbso8508 and reddit? One of the last leftist strongholds on the Internet? Why should anyone take them seriously?
3
When does socialism dislike the middle class?
3
@haraldthorson9153 in the video.
3
What has he gotten wrong?
3
@KansasHempMan I care not for your racism, socialist.
3
So you didn't watch the video?
3
Can you provide a definition that actually encompasses real world socialist states?
3
@LeeZaslofsky now so?
3
Dam, you should watch TIK’s video on why Hitler had to start the war when he did.
3
What are you talking about? My point was the Soviet Union purged all other classes just like how the Nazis purged all other races. Nazism is race based socialism and Marxism is class based socialism. Your tirade about them being nostalgic bulks at the face of their actual ideology, how their only goal was to invade east to get resources so they could establish a socialist utopia for the German, how they never made an effort to reinstate the Kaiser, and how they implemented extensive social programs and centrally controlled the economy. None of this was return to tradition.
3
@andreoliveira6371 what does Putin have to do with anything, he isn’t ruling the Soviet Union why bring him up?
3
@andreoliveira6371 so did Putin or Hitler believe that the economy would be better run by central control instead of market forces?
3
@andreoliveira6371 because free market people say the state shouldn’t be doing that.
3
@andreoliveira6371 all socialism has ever done was create oligarchies, so saying capitalism is bad for doing the same thing is ridiculous.
3
@andreoliveira6371 Socialists say all rights are allowed only if they benefit the collective. This is what their dream state will be like. Libertarians say all rights are unrevocable even if they harm the collective. This is what their dream state will be like. While a better balance of the two could potentially be found, just out of the two I know which one I want to live in.
3
@hobbso8508 but life is exploitation of labor, if you don’t exploit yourself for your labor you won’t have food. Profits just show that more value was created then destroyed. If you farm more then you eat your making a profit.
3
@hobbso8508 why is the capitalist taking your excess?
3
Previous
15
Next
...
All