Comments by "" (@AlonzoHarris235) on "Chris At Speakers Corner" channel.

  1.  @uguroz3745  Muslims don’t see anyone equal to God. Can you show me a Muslim who makes this claim? I’m glad people can read your comments. You are only proving that Christians are notorious liars who argue in bad faith. Show me from a theological source. If you claim to be a follower of the religion of ‘truth’. How come you lie so much?
    1
  2.  @sura2proyect428  Paul claims that Jesus is an angel in the present tense.
    1
  3.  @uguroz3745  Why are you ignoring my refutation? You are just repeating your refuted claim without engaging with the refutation.
    1
  4.  @travisdempster4693  You don’t have an answer. There is no circle argument. You are just asserting that because you have no solution and answer for the logical problem of the trinity. Logic is not circular. Your ‘argument’ is circular. You have to presuppose Christianity as a criteria of truth. I have already shown that Christianity is a square circle. A square circle doesn’t exist or has the possibility to exist. It’s a logical impossibility. It’s a logical contradiction. You keep using the word triune. You can’t even define what you consider to be triune. Is the trinity one self or three selves? This is a simple basic valid question. If you can’t answer it. You are simply using words you can’t even define or understand. This means your words are meaningless.
    1
  5.  @travisdempster4693  Is this your answer? There is one Yahweh? The Father, Son and Spirit are all identical to Yahweh? This is just modalism. Things that are identical to the same thing are identical to eachother. It simply follows from the law of identity.
    1
  6.  @travisdempster4693  I don’t have to prove anything from your scripture. The trinity is not biblical in the first place. Nobody in the bible worships a triune god or prays to a triune god. They always pray to one person. Even if it was biblical. It doesn’t change the argument. My critique is based on your theological position. The trinity results in three gods. Your model of the trinity results in modalism. All the persons are identical to the same thing. It follows from the law of identity that they are identical to eachother in your model.
    1
  7.  @RobertBooker-xi8cc  It’s not an assertion. We can measure that by objective standards.
    1
  8.  @allah_is_an_arab  Chris is contradicting himself. Nobody has responded to the presented contradiction. I have refuted his claims. Nobody can refute my refutation of his claims. You can read back. Christians don’t want to engage with refutations and questions. I’m not changing anything. I have responded to the topic. I debunked it. I’m now showing logical contradictions in your theology. That’s the most essential thing in faith. I have debunked your theological position. Christians who try to argue about preservation. They simply acknowledge that the sayings and teachings of Jesus are not preserved. Because they can’t defend it. They try to find similar things in other religions.🥴🤣 Who is deflecting.🤓 The greatest argument against Christianity are the logical contradictions in your core doctrines. There is a reason why your apologists don’t want to deal with this.🤡
    1
  9.  @allah_is_an_arab  You can read back. I have refuted his fallacies. Nobody has a response. That includes you. You can’t solve the logical contradictions in his claims.
    1
  10.  @travisdempster4693  Jesus is a Muslim in the Quran. You are clearly trying to twist verses with your made up Christian understanding. The followers of Jesus don’t believe Jesus is God. That’s very clear in the Quran. You can’t defend your religion. You are trying to make my sources confirm your religion because you can’t engage with my arguments.🫠 That’s why the churches are empty. That’s why Christianity is in a huge decline. Christianity in secular surveys include ‘heretics’ like Unitarians.🫵🏼🫠
    1
  11.  @travisdempster4693  You are diverting. What does the word ‘is’ mean? What does the word ‘is’ represents? Is it identity or predication? These are the only two options. Words have meanings. The bible has no dictionary. It doesn’t need to mention identical. It can be in other words like the word ‘is’. Do you understand basic language? Do you even know what language is. What do you mean by Jesus is God? He is identical to God? Which God? The triune God?
    1
  12.  @travisdempster4693  I didn’t make a claim from the bible. My argument is based on your theology. It’s a logical argument against your theology. If your theology is biblical or not. That’s not irrelevant. I just said that as a side note because you claimed it’s biblical. Even if we accept that false assertion. Your theology is still a logical contradiction. You are simply stating that the bible contains a contradicting theology.
    1
  13.  @Redsok  What is that?
    1
  14.  @travisdempster4693  I am a human. That’s a predication. How many human beings are we? One or two? Is there one human being on earth or billions? I asked you if it’s a statement of identity or predication. You first said identity. After finding out the implications you shifted to predication. You want from modalism to tritheism.
    1
  15.  @travisdempster4693  You don’t have a response. That’s why you try to attack me personally. I’m not important. Can you solve the logical contradiction of the trinity and incarnation. If a contradiction is presented. You can’t simply wave it off and pretend it doesn’t exist. It exists until you disprove it. Nobody has done that so far. Your scholars (analytical philosophers) are still writing books about it to try to solve the problem. They have all failed. You don’t see Muslims writing books for 1400 years to solve a logical contradiction based on the oneness of god. Because it’s clear and logical. Your trinity is a logical contradiction.
    1
  16.  @Redsok  I don’t see a link. Where?
    1
  17.  @allah_is_an_arab  You can read back. I have demonstrated a logical contradiction in his claims. You haven’t responded to this refutation. You simply try to ignore it and pretend that it’s refuted if you ignore it.🥴🤣 My refutation is valid until you can disprove it. I have disproven his claim by demonstrating a logical contradiction in his claim.🫠
    1
  18.  @allah_is_an_arab  We count attributes by identity. We also count beings by identity. That’s why you are only one human being.🤓 Jake schooled Jay. Do you believe in the transcendental ‘argument’ of Jay Dyer? Have you watched the debate? He called out your Catholic Church. He said that the western model of the trinity is modalism.🤣
    1
  19.  @allah_is_an_arab  Do you support Jay Dyer?🥴🤣 You are repeating the nonsense of Jay Dyer. He said something true. He said that the Catholic model of the trinity is modalism.🤣 Do you agree with him?
    1
  20.  @allah_is_an_arab  You haven’t responded to my refutation. You have only made false assertions without a demonstration. You are multiple human beings?🥴🤣 If we follow your rule of identity. We have to count you as multiple human beings.🥴🤣
    1
  21.  @allah_is_an_arab  How does that follow?🥴🤣 Logic is clearly not your field.🫠
    1
  22.  @allah_is_an_arab  You don’t have an answer. The logical contradiction in his claim still stands. You haven’t responded to the logical contradiction in his claim.🫠
    1
  23.  @allah_is_an_arab  We count attributes by identity. That’s why there are multiple attributes. We also count beings by identity. That’s why there is only one being. Are you multiple human beings?🥴🤣
    1
  24.  @allah_is_an_arab  You are just making assertions. You haven’t demonstrated any of your assertions. How does your conclusion follow?🤣🥴 Give the premises and conclusion. Show me in a table.🫠
    1
  25.  @allah_is_an_arab  This is not common sense. Nobody makes that claim. It’s not common sense. You need to demonstrate your ‘sense’. How does counting multiple attributes by identity results into multiple Quran?🤣🥴 Can you give a justification and demonstration of that? You have only made this assertion. You can’t even justify your assertions. You can’t even formulate a logical argument.🤣🥴
    1
  26.  @allah_is_an_arab  I have provided evidence. I gave a demonstration. You have only made assertions. I can even use your bible. Your bible doesn’t agree with you. If we accept your assertion. We should count each and every god in your bible as multiple gods for having multiple real distinct attributes and properties. Your bible doesn’t do that. Even your bible refutes your nonsense. Baal is not called multiple gods for example. Why not if this figure has multiple real distinct properties and attributes in your bible? You don’t count Zeus as multiple gods but one god. Why does everyone count in this way? Everyone counts by identity. We count attributes by identity. We count beings by identity. That’s why everyone counts one being and multiple properties. There is one being by identity. There are multiple attributes by identity. Multiple real distinct properties don’t make one self more selves by identity. This is common sense. Your assertions is not shared by anyone. You need to give a demonstration of your assertion. You also need to clarify your position. Beau Branson counts by division. Your Catholic Church doesn’t agree with that. They count by identity. This is all taken from Aquinas. I can recommend you books to read and study your own position. I don’t make random claims. I have studied the material. I can even show you how Aquinas uses identity. I can show you the logical problems in his position. Are you Catholic? Do you count by identity (Catholic) or division (Beau Branson)?
    1
  27. Chris believes in three gods.
    1
  28.  @sura_65.4  Chris believes in three gods.🥴🤣
    1
  29.  @sura_65.4  I’m not upset. Chris believes in three gods. Christ is upset. Because he knows his bible is problematic.😆
    1
  30.  @maikilreategui1271  I’m a biblical scholar.
    1
  31.  @Sam-Bob-Glogic  Do you talk to someone’s chest?🤓
    1
  32.  @sura_65.4  He schooled himself. He just proved that your bible is corrupted.
    1
  33.  @sura_65.4  Is Chris a Christian? Which methodology does he use?🤓 Off course Christianity is relevant. I’m talking to Christians. Christians who are so ashamed of their bible. They want to make the Quran identical to the major and huge problems of the bible. It only proves that Christians have thrown the towel on their bible.🥴🤣
    1
  34.  @aureum7479  With lies Christianity still dies.
    1
  35.  @lshed28  If Satan knows the bible. How come he helped to save you by trying to take out the mangod?😳
    1
  36. You are an actor. Your story contains contradictions.
    1
  37. These Christians believe in three gods.
    1
  38.  @IvanSensei88  Is human sacrifice paganism? Yes or no?
    1
  39. What is the meaning of son? Is it literal, metaphorical or by adoption?
    1
  40.  @Leo-yx7rk  What are the double meanings? Why is the second person called The Son? Why is the third person not a Son?
    1
  41.  @YeshuaAkbar7  How do you know Jesus said that?
    1
  42. The trinity is three gods.
    1
  43. Is Jesus the triune God?🥴🤣
    1
  44. @KZNGUY23 You believe the triune God is the true God. You also claim that Jesus is the same true God. Is Jesus the triune God?
    1
  45. @KZNGUY23 I condemn your God in numbers 31:18. Do you condemn numbers 31:18?
    1
  46.  @toomanymarys7355  That’s such a great ‘argument’. You are such an ‘intellect’.🥴🤣
    1
  47.  @toomanymarys7355  This is your ‘argument’. 1 the Quran is inspired by Satan. 2 the Quran advises Christians to judge by the bible. What is the conclusion of your ‘argument’? You are claiming that Satan advises Christians to follow the bible.🥴🤣
    1
  48.  @John_Six_Twenty-Nine  You don’t have to be a Muslim to conclude that your bible doesn’t go back to the prophets.🫠 It’s a fact.🫠
    1
  49.  @John_Six_Twenty-Nine  You don’t even know who God is.🥴🤣 Your god is a logical contradiction. Logical contradictions are by definition false.
    1
  50.  @John_Six_Twenty-Nine  The timeless god came in time.🥴 The second person in the trinity is limited and unlimited at the same time. The true god is the triune god. Jesus is the true god. He is not the triune god.🥴 I can go on and on. Logical contradiction after logical contradiction.
    1