Comments by "LancesArmorStriking" (@LancesArmorStriking) on "HasanAbi" channel.

  1.  @tatyanasolovey8539  Ah, you censor the word God. No prizes for guessing where your loyalties lie, then. I'm sure you're completely unbiased.
    7
  2. ​ @marvin2678  Back to their native countries. Poland, Germany, NYC, Russia, Middle East... that solves like 70% of where the Israelis can go. The rest who are fully Israelized and lost connection to their homeland can pick wherever they want.
    7
  3.  @jebbo-c1l  The world's security cannot be sacrificed for Poland
    6
  4.  @QuantumPineapple  Doesn't really matter in this case, because the "small" minority of Zionist Israelis who do believe are the ones pushing forward. And it would be much harder to justify if there weren't a Jewish religion telling them "you're special, you're God's chosen people, slaughter the native tribes!". Judaism has to be the most pompous and self-centered religion, I swear
    6
  5.  @scullystie4389  Unrelated but I really miss 2009, everything was so much simpler then
    6
  6.  @erawwwww  First of all, learn to spell. Second of all, how does what I said make any difference? The different reasons for male vs female crashes =/= who crashes more
    6
  7.  @skimsakj642  "I guess those innocent civilians near where Hamas is operating also earned their deaths" They didn't sign up to be Hamas party members, or help them. THE ENGINEERS DID, FFS. You don't just waltz into a military job, have YOU even served? You need security clearances and a good repertoire to join soldiers on-duty even in a non-combatant capacity. This is especially true in areas where the US infrastructure is vulnerable to sabotage.
    6
  8.  @xEnder515  perhaps it is desperation? Changing an entire society takes decades, or a violent revolt. But your family needs financial stability now- an empty stomach will not wait for unionization. Not defending, but trying to understand another perspectivr
    6
  9.  @BushidoBrownSama  I'm a whole year late, but I love the Boondocks reference. RIP Grandad :'(
    6
  10. Martin Shkreli 2
    6
  11.  @sols4102  Wdym? Even for studies that are behind a paywall, you can usually email the author for a copy and they'll happily send it to you. You can read every single word of what data they used, how they measured it, what their process was, etc etc. There's a reason scientific journals exist, anyone can read them. You don't have to just "trust" them— the whole point of science is to NOT trust anything and try to disprove theories ("theory" btw just means body of data, not "idea").
    6
  12. ​​ @Alex-vo2ew  You can call it whatever you want, but Syria never requested the US to have ANY military presence there. It is patently illegal. And if it wants the world's support for its foreign policies, it needs to stop being hypocritical. It can't simultaneously condemn one country for foreign occupation and then do it itself.
    6
  13.  @Alex-vo2ew  "The US was brought into Syria by a coalition force" Was Syria part of that coalition force? No? Then it was, and is, illegal and the US should vacate immediately. End of story. I'm not sure what you were trying to say regarding my pfp— that shouldn't really influence the veracity of my words. I never understood this, the idea that someone's identity makes the ideas they profess less true than if someone else were to to say them. Hitler was an animal rights acitivst, and I would agree with him about those ideas in isolation. Obviously, everything else he said and did is abhorrent, but I can separate the art from the artist, so to speak. Do you really hate Russia so much that you get emotional and can't analyze my words dispassionately? Regarding the last part of your comment— IS IS has been defeated, it's been years and only ISIS-K poses a threat. Trump has said publicly what the US' goal is in occupying northeastern Syria, and if it were purely for de-escalational purposes, US soldiers wouldn't be helping Kurds steal oil belonging to the Syrian government and selling it on the global market. You can also try and deflect by calling it 'a buffer zone' but that doesn't make it legal and you have yet to acknowledge the blatant illegality of US actions. Tell you what, if you admit the US is violating international law, I'll say Russia is, too. You can get your licks in. Deal?
    6
  14. ...This is the issue I have with the other side. Do you actually see that happening? And if not, how do you think this war will end? The pro-Ukraine people (since they wont negotiate on the 2nd terms you gave) refuse to entertain the idea that Russia won't give an unconditional surrender. My simple question is, what if they don't? How do you achieve peace if your imagined pre-requisite never happens?
    5
  15.  @mookiestewart3776  Russia has only ever "expanded" in direct response to American attempts to expand their influence. Georgia was invaded only after NATO announced in 2008 that both it and Ukraine "will become part of NATO." Had that announcement not been made, and the region posed no threat to Russia (Georgia is no threat), there would have been no reason to invade. The only reason they put all that time and energy and human lives into the conflict, was because the alternative (having an American military base on your southern border, and economic pressure) is a far worse alternative.
    5
  16.  @PWN3GE  No, it does, but in the absence of an alternative, it is the practical thing to do. Russia has genuine security concerns about a US military presence right on its southern border. I could very easily see CIA agents training Chechen separatists to fracture Russia into more pieces. Funny enough, that is how the 2nd Chechen War started, except it was Saudi Arabia doing the funding then. So no, it's not "Russian paranoia". However, just as Russia has genuine concerns, so does Georgia. So what do we do? Problem is, NATO is zero-sum. Either Georgia is in NATO, and Russia is unhappy, or it isn't and Georgia is unhappy. I think I compromise could be reached, but the West seems to think that its way is the only way. It refuses to compromise, and takes nothing less than full NATO membership as satisfactory. In th face of that stubbornness, what is Russia (for its own self-interest) supposed to do? Roll over?
    5
  17. As we've seen in Viper's video on this, what little data we do have on channel engagement from large reactors shows little effect on the channel views or subscriptions.
    5
  18.  @TheHuxleyAgnostic  Nope. Russia directly opposes US power, letting Ukraine make the US even stronger is not a good thing.
    5
  19.  @aitor.online  unofficially raises brow in Russian
    5
  20. ​ @lucac1430  I think he's talking about what happened to the Romanovs, or the landlords for the Chinese...
    5
  21.  @nob2243  He's not stupid, he's just brazen. Like any other Russian doing shady business on the streets you need to be ruthless and make it known. This is how he got to the top, it's all he knows, he just thought that conducting mutiny with the same loud brutishness would work and members of Russian military would publicly support him. When that didn't work he accepted his fate and backed down to keep the effort in Ukraine from stalling or collapsing.
    5
  22. this makes me question adam's advice of "please join local politics", not sure i could avoid going insane
    5
  23. ​ @CFRTrainSpotter  Thankfully Poland has a track record of being hateful, but not hypocritical. "Thank you, Joe Biden" comes to mind. They knew who did it, maybe we can ask them even more questions
    5
  24. ​ @GAMEOVER-yy6zj  Games are qualitatively different. Every playthrough is different owing to the open ended nature of a game. It's not like a video, which is linear and is the exact same no matter how many times you play it. Seen it once, seen it all. There's no speedrunning or pacifist video runthrough. Also this sounds a lot like people trying to bash Bernie for selling a book to discredit his actual points. Even if we assume DarkViper's a total hypocrite, his points are still correct. No matter how many times I click 'Do Not Recommend, Has keeps showing up...
    5
  25.  @thebignacho  No, the left isn't saying that. In fact, it's the right that's being hypocritical. They were SO supportive of the Supreme Court decision to allow a baker to refuse service to someone because they're gay. But when a tech company refuses service to someone because they're supporting Trump? "That's oppression, my freedom of speech wahhh!" No, it's not. The Constitution protects you from government censorship. If you step onto corporate jurisdiction, it's their rules. Anyway, you haven't really addressed what I said before, and you'll need to be more specific about which "mental gymnastics" we're doing. If it's blatantly obvious, like you said, point it out. I personally don't mind property destruction, even federal, but I do think you're just wrong in your ideas and reasons for storming the Capitol. I don't oppose your right to riot, though, just like I support our right to do that too. It's not legal in either the police OR Capitol riots but neither was he Boston Tea Party
    5
  26.  @boxybrown6900  hey state department guy, update your vocabulary, it isnt 1950s anymore
    5
  27. haha stinky
    5
  28. At risk of getting firebombed here: I think Hasan is absolutely part of the problem with lazy streamers. In fact, he's among the worst. Yes, his political content is very transformative— pausing and giving commentary (or even yelling at people in chat) breaks the pace of the video enough that it can be considered its own thing. That being said— the criticism isn't about his streaming as a whole, it's about his NON-POLITICAL streams. I don't think I need to point out how un-transformative playing someone's whole video while you just eat quietly in the corner of the screen is. For those of you tripping over yourselves to play defense for Hasan, "what he can't even EAT now, omg you people are literally unironically brainbroken-" Nope. He's more than free to eat. He just can't play someone else's content in the background. It's way harder to add commentary when your mouth is full of food, (not like Hasan does that anyway and for that I'm grateful) so knowingly playing a video while you're unable to add anything transformative is no better than pirating a movie, except instead of a big studio you're depriving income from a small creator. Add to that Hasan Chair content which I hope I don't have to explain and you've got a streamer who's successfully toeing the line. It's not so egregious that he'll come in the line of fire like xQC, but it's just bad enough that it's taking traffic away from other streamers (the ones whose content is organic and by nature less frequent) and YouTubers who just watch Hasanabi clip channels. Like seriously how hard is it to put up a BRB screen when you're eating or leaving the chair? He's never addressed this. I'd like for once for Hasan to answer the question instead of crying "sO yOu wAnT mE To DiE?! I CaN'T eVEN EaT!!" No you idiot, no one's saying that. Stop with the red herring. You don't HAVE to play other people's videos while you're gone or unable to speak. So why don't you put up a BRB screen?? Rant over. Fuck content stealers
    5
  29. We almost had one...
    5
  30. React to the Vaush vs. Destiny debate on this shooting, it's fucking insane. Like, it's the most psychopath shit I've seen in years, LiveLeak included
    5
  31. Is it not though? How does Russia's domestic situation impact how representative of freedom this interview is? Aside from "vibes" Should Osama not have been interviewed as well then? Do we then decide to only give interviews to countries friendly to us? And just let the media decide for us about the perceived enemies?
    5
  32. It's just a very Americanized country so it feels "safe" for them to visit Just foreign enough to be exotic yet familiar enough to not dissuade them from going
    5
  33. Ironic considering how many of his 'brothers' in the corps will likely become homeless too
    5
  34.  @cul8terworld  Seems unlikely. A standard flight from Moscow to SPb? No way that would just fall out of the sky. It's a hit job and most people understand it to be this. It was just done in a way that could be plausibly denied.
    5
  35.  @yobased2872  With a username like yours, along with the fact that you can' fucking spell, it really makes me marvel at America, and the fact that Trump will probably win. I don't think you can fix this country's problems. This country is the problem.
    5
  36. @Einzige Cant forget wheat and soy crops, neither yee yee
    5
  37.  @riorio745  Half Russian, half Arab, one people? Part of me thinks that their national psyche was so damaged during Nazi times that they subconsciously want to become them, to "fix" the past harm done to the nation. Putting themselves in the position of power, refusing to acknowledge that they still feel weak and scared.
    5
  38.  @ravenblood1954  I mean... their demands are not keeping the territory. Their demands are the dissolution of the current government, which was established after 2 separate violations of Ukraine's Constitution which the Verkhovnaya Rada oversaw. Accepting the results of the Crimean referendum, while keeping your current government, is the compromise. "Peace" doesn't mean complete victory for one side. It means that the bullets stop firing. It means compromise, and until Ukraine understands this, the conflict will continue in one form or another.
    4
  39. He's got that Putin lips Now if only he had the round face
    4
  40. HistoryLegends was QUICK to this joke
    4
  41. ​ @FeiFongWang  Kind of is. He's siphoning traffic (and people's limited free time) away from creators who actually put in hours of editing, scripting, and creative work. Hasan just takes the finished product and (occasionally) comments on it. It's one step removed from outright piracy. I don't have a problem with that against big companies, but small YouTubers? He's refused to address this. At least put up a "I'll be back" banner, ffs. He has the money it would be easy to set up in literally a day. Yet he doesn't. Ask yourself why
    4
  42. "More countries in NATO = more good" I hope the irony of speaking like a caveman to justify NATO expansion isn't lost on you
    4
  43.  @ImAmirus  There are weapons. There are systems of weapons. Systems control the individual weapons— coordinate simultaneous strikes, guide smart missiles to their targets, keep tabs on depleting stock. But sure, "Star Trek". You, like the other person, avoided addressing the main point. I simply said that the US does actually decide if Ukraine cedes land or not because it's the one that controls Ukraine's physical capacity to fight on. The US could force Ukraine to negotiate by simply refusing to send anything else. After all, they have the factories which make all the weapons, not Ukraine. The Ukrainians know they'd quickly lose and would do as the US says. This is my point. When you control the means of production, you have the power to make decisions.
    4
  44. The thing is, your personal experience isn't at all mutually exclusive to the statistics. Women are generally more cautious than men when driving-- I'd be willing to bet that their accidents are caused by making mistakes out of error. Whereas with guys, their mistakes are probably out of recklessness. So the mere fact that you handed off a drive to a guy who-- in that situation-- probably isn't gonna show off, is affirming the fact that you're less likely to do something stupid while driving. A guy would just say 'I can handle it lol' and risk it.
    4
  45.  @skimsakj642  "stem from military" doesn't mean 'curently provide your services to them'. And I need you to explain what "most civilian engineering comes from career paths in the military" means. Are you trying to claim engineering careers always have to originate in the military?? You're also avoiding the point. I'm not saying that those engineers should have had no connection to the military— I'm saying they had a very active role (they were stationed abroad alongside soldiers ffs) and for that, they earned their deaths.
    4
  46.  @Robiness  I mean technically that's the one thing he did do... Tesla Motors was well on its way to producing cars before he showed up, they would have rolled off the production line regardless. Elon, though, is a hype machine and actually made it cool (by association with himself) to own an electric car. Remember how cool it was that a Roadster was launched into space? That's the zeitgeist when you're a good marketer... but not much else
    4
  47. Omg no. Why are Americans like this "He's a good person with a heart of gold— he should be president!" You want a competent president, not a kind one. Leadership is about much more than having the right ideals, politics is a difficult endeavor and needs a ruthless statesman to be effective.
    4
  48. Used to be 4, but Romansh is dying Still beautiful country
    4
  49.  @durrnip  What is that context, then? It's fairly simple to me: the Jews in diaspora in the 1930s and 40s forced the British (through acts of terrorism, like Irgun setting off bombs in their embassies) to allow them to migrate to what was at that point Mandatory Palestine. There were plenty of alternatives to a Jewish state outside of the holy land, including the US and Argentina. But they insisted on the "Holy Land" because Uganda had gone so poorly. The entire point of Zionism, as outlined by Theodor Hertzl in the early 1900s, was to be a colonial outpost. He wrote to Cecil Rhodes and made as much very clear. “You are being invited to help make history. It doesn’t involve Africa, but a piece of Asia Minor; not Englishmen but Jews… How, then, do I happen to turn to you since this is an out-of-the-way matter for you? How indeed? Because it is something colonial.” This is in Herzl's own handwriting— he copied the letter he wrote into his journal.
    4
  50.  @ELDENLORD89  Olsen might've passed if he didn't refuse people entering his church after that hurricane
    4