Comments by "The Phoenix Saga" (@The_Phoenix_Saga) on "BlackBeltBarrister" channel.

  1.  @samrodian919  You still don't get it - they don't care if you spoil the ballot; you've still signed it and that's all that actually matters. Ballots act as a contract in affirming consent to the process - the status quo doesn't care if you're trying to affirm discontent, merely secure your consent, without you even realising it. You've played only yourself.
    1
  2.  @SusanBell-dl5gr  There already isn't - it's already doomed. The amount of folk who cling desperately in thinking "Vote reform!" "Vote this, not that!" have guaranteed it.
    1
  3.  @gam9063  Paying attention to what is, instead of just what is said. It's nothing secret, nothing hidden in some secret grotto: it's right there in plain sight.
    1
  4.  @Fitlad75  I'm doing more than the obstinant who insist on keeping the spiral going. People keep complaining about government, yet they just keep on empowering them because they blindly think someone else is going to do things differently so they don't have to. And that's what it all boils down to - a large mass wanting all the luxury but none of the responsibility for it. Then they whine when things don't go their way and often get worse... but apparently I'm the one not trying.
    1
  5.  @notyourordinarygran  Have you actually paid attention to my argument, or are you just content with parroting a response I've already dismantled?
    1
  6.  @Seashore1403  Nope, realist.
    1
  7.  @Chippytea99  People chose to do that, that isn't the responsibility of the one uploading.
    1
  8.  @phill6859  😏 course the officer did...
    1
  9. No, they like capitalism, they just want it for themselves with communism for everyone else.
    1
  10.  @nickryder9669  Oh really; from what I remember- we had an illegal war and Brown sold off our remaining gold reserves thus spiking inflation further beyond the point of no return on a currency already backed on debt. If you're trying to fool anyone, it is only yourself. Both did what the masters of all of them, told them: take the hint.
    1
  11.  @DJ67mc  psh "growth" the only thing that's ever grown is the debt that's owed - unless the pound ceased being backed by debt and found itself based on an actual physical collateral.
    1
  12. So many way for an emergency vehicle despite a red light is deemed prosecutable, but deliberate evidence of a bus is not? No wonder there's a lack of confidence in the system...
    1
  13. Finally, a strike worth having...
    1
  14.  @Eleventhearlofmars  Because the banks and their business interests run the country de jure - they want their payments and we as a nation are essentially bankrupt. So Reform gets in and what will they do? As they're told like their predecessors have, or refuse and thus have us be defaulting completely; our money realised as worthless and everything else that follows?
    1
  15. The first in movement, not the impulsive, has right of way. Short and sweet of it. "Everyone on the road doesnt know how to drive, so act as the example how to." Keeping to that golden rule, is why i have never had an issue i could be blamed for.
    1
  16.  @ciaran82359  at most you'd have an argument for defamation of character - seeing as there was no item in question, not to mention in the situation, that there was no such theft and unnecessary attention was brought to your person. That said however I perceive as a civil matter between you and the guard so that would be out of the store's hands; as bad as it is - he'd have best made sure without controvertible evidence that there was cause to act and from what you're saying, there was none. He was excessive and poorly judging given from what I've read. As for seeing the footage yourself before his searching - that would not be possible without going through the loop, due to the Data Protection Act; at least it's revisions in the last few years, typically non-security and non-law enforcement are restricted from immediate access of cctv footage even if that is of the individual themselves.
    1
  17.  @heidiblake7957  it's essentially the same here; until past the point of intended sale - IE, the entrance/exit doors, unless blatant theft is in place: say the individual is opening products and consuming them before discarding the packaging without payment, or removing security tagging from alcohol, approach and challenging (Which is the exception under the notion of theft via consumption) there is no purpose in approaching any individual for the purpose of challenge as any matter with exception to the examples I've just made are at best, purely circumstantial.
    1
  18.  @nickryder9669  finished?
    1
  19.  @nickryder9669  still ranting incoherently?
    1
  20.  @hhtrichard  The moment a charity starts paying it's members running it, it ceases to be a charity and becomes a business. A business turning profit at the expense of the gullible shelling with the suffering in mind. It's sick and I will never fund it. Argued left, right or whatever - this is vile no matter how you slice it.
    1
  21.  @ernestschroeder9762  only those prepared to stand their ground for each right, have any. The moment you choose to empower someone over you, you forfeit any you believe you have in exchange for privileges they choose to give and take from you at their whim.
    1
  22. The governing are just the puppets - havent you realised that yet??
    1
  23.  @clivewilliams3661  They're a puppet show, to make the masses believe they have a say - When in truth all they can choose is the face to blame; to target the symptom and not the cause.
    1
  24.  @eyesodd  Then consider this ominous factor- what if Reform or the other choices acted out the same way? Suppose they answer to the establishment and that the choices result in the same outcome and that you'd be stuck anyway. And no we wouldn't. if the public and all those in the military turned their back and ignored establishment- what exactly could approximately 2000 in governance do to a population of 70 million who don't even acknowledge their claim.
    1
  25.  @DavidJohnson-yg8qm  No, they're just playing the system for themselves. The ones who really run things are those who own the banks and therefore the currency.
    1
  26. All guidance dogs and care animals are permitted in store and one is defined by declaration upon approach by Security or Manager. Upon which, Security nor Manager is permitted to determine otherwise. Source - Security Section Leader.
    1
  27.  @Kj16V  They weren't hunting people down en mass and deeming them criminals before their trial - which for the law to do, by its own definition is illegal. Then again, had they won the election, such would have happened anyway, seeing as all politicians answer to the same master regardless of party.
    1
  28.  @tony_w839  They're crossing the channel ILLEGALLY from a safe country - I and so many others do NOT care what semantics are used to argue that; it's a fact. Those are not refugees, those are not asylum seekers, those are migrants; illegals at that. And the law is doing NOTHING.
    1
  29.  @engineeredlifeform  utter rubbish.
    1
  30.  @Ozymandi_as  nice explanation. But in the end you offer nothing but convenient rationalisation for the government in it's entirety- not just this current party to keep doing nothing and thus prove itself inept. And for all your talk of a "Liberal Democracy" we're living in a police state already where much in the way of speech is restricted for the sake of weak minded folk and their feefees. Most wouldn't recognise actual liberal values if they were slapped in the face by them. Or if they were - they'd whine and cry about it.
    1
  31.  @Gapis321  And you nailed it. Frankly the fact that beachfront properties aren't having "Environmental Changes" added onto their morgage values, or that insurance companies aren't doing making such either - goes to show that even they know it's complete bs.
    1
  32.  @KemPeck1701  Isn't it obvious why it doesn't work? People. That's why; plain and simple. They talk a big game when it comes to equality and yet when push comes to shove- even those at the top will push down. The law is fallible because it's created by and enforced by people. Its never worked long term and unfortunately the cycle of history is doomed to repeat with only slight details changing.
    1
  33. What I'd like for you to do, is to explain what the currency is backed on and how exactly is it to be repaid back via the loans this nation makes to the bank who prints it along with the interest.
    1
  34.  @iain4  The system IS the corruption- always was.
    1
  35.  @iain4  Because it always was and still is the source of it. And those up top want it that way.
    1
  36.  @carmenbyrne6521  Well of course Diana 'wasn't' knocking boots with a certain Captain, now penniless gardener whilst she and Charlie were still married... 🙄
    1
  37.  @MrRedeyedJedi  depends on the one doing the judging - the authorities should check the facts and rule the fact you are entitled to self defense should someone come with the intention to inflict harm. As for anyone else not there, they just need to be told quite cordially to suck a chode because they don't know what they're talking about.
    1
  38. And just what are you going to about it folks? Thats right - nothing, aside from crossing a box and consenting to this. And you wonder why it happens
    1
  39. ​ @MarkPayne-k7l Oh shove it, capitualist.
    1
  40.  @Dom-De  Thanks for providing the fact that those who call it out for what it is, dont last long.
    1
  41. The guillotine wasnt medieval and we did it first with either a sword or an axe.
    1
  42.  @lilyvonshtuup  Then i trust you won't ever vote again.
    1
  43.  @lilyvonshtuup  And you think you're going to get that through the system? The government have no plans to start engaging to resolve this and the establishment, doesn't want them to make one. This would be over in a month at the most if the reverse were true - this is being done for a purpose and so long as people keep enabling the system in spite of their complaints, not one change will be made.
    1
  44.  @lilyvonshtuup  Well i can assure you that voting; even out of protest will do no good. The ballot acts as a legally binding contract to permit whoever wins to act in your name and the reality is that all the parties answer to the same establishment. Their difference is only to tell person A what they want to hear and person B what they want; all for the purpose to get your consent on paper.
    1
  45.  @lilyvonshtuup  Unfortunately you're right - too many people indoctrinated into blind acceptance and willful ignorance. As such its an exercise in futility. What's coming isn't a matter of if; only when and the question becomes - will you cower and just toe the line or will you stand your ground and be prepared to go out in a blaze of glory?
    1
  46. @TheTimeKeepersJournal a criminal calling a crime gives little incentive for following said law, now doesn't it.
    1
  47. This is what you get when you spend your entire life getting complete strangers to "represent" you and defend your "rights"
    1
  48.  @neilgarland9736  they are few and we are unfortunately a few among the many - the many are the mob and are easily distracted. If the many weren't then all this would have been over before it began.
    1
  49.  @primrosegoldprimrosegold1265  well since those in charge of the state want to use the mantra "If you've nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about" to justify the invasion of privacy and argue for intrusive snooping; the same should be argued on the state. For a corrupted state can not stand. Better to live in anarchy then in tyranny.
    1
  50.  @bowserheadteacher  And with that, you have something that those who do take part don't: the right to actually object and argue. The question now is: will you stand your ground to keep it? If yes, then you have my respect.
    1