Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@defeqel6537 so, you plan to fire all your engineers doing programming, CAD design, Matlab computations and simulation, FA, CFD, designrs making drawings, building BOMs, doing ECOs, ordering parts, getting and doing quotes, excel data analysis, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@FoxxyCZ but that's not always the case. Many math problems have more than one possible answer. Solving triangles, square roots, quantum physics, Pythagorean theorem, chaos theory and 3+ body problems, and much more have somewhere between 2-infinite solutions.
And there are Many different ways to solve almost every math problem correctly. If you stick to the basics and follow the basic rules, in general, yes, math is very regimented and rules based, but not nearly as much as you think. But if you never move past that level of understanding, you'll never truly master math nor get good at its range of real-world applications. In engineering for example, figuring out the range of acceptable variations of everything is really what you're trying to do, not solve exact equations.
But yes, if something is a Proven Fact, then one person disagreeing could be seen as obstructionist. but it might also be that they are simply still learning and don't know all teh information needed to understand why they are wrong. We have to give people the chance to learn. And many times in history, when humans thought they had something figured out, only to find out later it was all wrong, had to accept that what they once thought was proven fact, was in fact not a Fact at all. And if we never have people challenging such notions, we'd never discover the truth. it all depends upon what they are disagreeing with, and why.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1