Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Sandboxx" channel.

  1.  @cameronspence4977  Russia has more than 50 Su 57, soon to be 100 crafts. And that's not the main point. The point is that it flies on the daily basis over the combat zone, and it hasn't malfunctioned and hasn't been shot down from the skies once. (Unlike F22 and F35)
    2
  2.  @cameronspence4977  After it enters service - it is expected to be a ready craft that has no problems with it and doesn't need more testing and fixing it. That's the implications of it. The Su 57 entered service 25 December 2020. So we start counting crashes and accidents since that point onward. When it was given a "check mark" on it's completeness. And there are NONE. No accidents or crashes. Perfect plane. Perfect engineering (best in the world). The F35 entered service 2 August 2016. So we start counting crashes and accidents since that date. And it had 14 so far. And the latest one of the 2025 is absolutely appalling too. I've only seen such nose dives and loss of thrust and control on the MiG15 2nd gen crafts before. On this allegedly "5th gen" plane. lol.
    2
  3. Thanks, Great video as always... 👍👍
    2
  4.  @hoghogwild  to my understanding, yes. Dry thrust. As it had it's efficiency drastically improved at different altitudes (AL51 is a completely new engine from the ground up, compare to the AL31 (the final form of the Arkhip Lyulka engine, that he had dreamed of all his life to create), the AL41 (with 80% new parts compared to the AL31) was an intermittent step to the AL51, and the AL51 is the truly new engine, of the new gen, called "gen 5+" by the engineers). Not that many people know that the thrust changes (sometimes even drastically ) depending on an altitude. And the "Dry thrust" in those metrics is always displayed at an intended "cruise" altitude. Meaning there's alot of variation to it, which nobody even cares to mention. But supposedly it doesn't lose as much thrust ,compare to any other engine, at sea level.
    2
  5. lol at copium part about the Su57... Yes you can argue at how often they operate in an contested air space, but you can't argue that they do, because we have video proofs of that(unlike with it's counterparts)... And yes, air dominance to some degree is opposed to the full stealth aircraft. Air dominance means - you can do "whatever you want in the skies". And that is precisely what the Russian Su57 does. Contrary to the purely stealth doctrine, of not being seen at all in order to conduct your mission, that limits the aircraft to be sitting at the back the whole time and NOT dominating the skies... as you can't dominate the skies whilst sitting at the back... hence why the Su57 is superior to it's adversaries and is dominating the skies now.
    2
  6. The funny thing is that fanboys are the ones who don't bring any constructive criticism and are just trying to mock me instead of having an adult conversation about the topic. fyi
    2
  7. @ That's the thing it CAN'T be destroyed and it's proving it EVERY SINGLE DAY in an active combat zone. It has been used in that conflict EVERY single day and it hasn't been shot down once. Every single other aircraft in the Russian VVS has been shot down. And the Su57 is the only one that hasn't been shot down while flying in an active combat zone every single day, in an out of the enemy territory. No other aircraft can do that. And it hasn't been destroyed on the ground either, they got some scratches. And are flying already right now. Which even proves that it is easily repairable. Which again, proves that it's the BEST 5th gen in the world and nothing comes even close to it.
    2
  8.  @andrewlorentz685  I don't know about it's design to "appear smaller" but it's whole design philosophy which dictated it's shape was withstanding the heating at high speeds. That particular shape is great at heat dissipation (as well as for stability), same with it's coating. I guess if it helped with stealth the more the merrier. But it wasn't part of it's design. In some sense that's what the future of 6th gen fighter get would look like , except it would be smaller and those engines would be integrated inside it's fuselage. But that it pretty much the best (more or less) shape for fast speeds.
    2
  9. SR72 doesn't exist. But if it were to exist. It's an interceptor, that can do reconnaissance too and perhaps precision strikes. It's not really something to consider strategically but rather some limited tactical use like the F117.
    2
  10.  @anthonykaiser974  sorry what question were you responding to. There are like 10 different conversations with 10 different people on 3 of the Alexes videos about the plane lol.
    2
  11. We already know how it looks like. The precise look is going to be reminiscent of the one that's been already presented. Not much can change from that point onward.
    2
  12. They are buying it for the same reason that AU switched from France to the US subs - Lobbyists. Pay a certain politicians a few mil. to get in the contract for your domestic factories. Simple as that.
    1
  13.  @jonathanbowen3640  So what's the rush then? to get nuclear subs? I smell BS.
    1
  14.  @RandomDeforge  👍👍On point. AlexH literally used a misinfo on top of a deliberate lie ( and he knows it, at least some of it), on top of deliberate manipulation... Then try to blame others LOL.
    1
  15.  @wedgeantilles8575  In the US as well.
    1
  16. On the contrary. It is the best comparison that you can make those are the direct 2 competitors.
    1
  17. Will the adaptive cycle ever be ready? So far it's pure marketing. I wouldn't be surprised if Russia or China gets there first.
    1
  18. 6th gen is pure marketing and lobbying. The only reason why they market it that way is to get the approval from congress. That is the only reason. Nothing about is is 6th gen. It's a twice as large version of the F35 Bomber jet, and that's it.
    1
  19.  @Sebby6666  ukrop hater detected.
    1
  20. LP is a NAFO shill. Not worth watching.
    1
  21.  @grandadmiralthrawn8116  except that... not. And being a military expert you would think that he would know that. I do understand that the general public doesn't understand it, that's normal. But I would never in a million years believe that Alex as a military expert doesn't know that... This whole video was just a propaganda piece.
    1
  22.  @tsumikiayato1560  it's only ridiculous for average people not understanding how this whole thing operates. And I perfectly understand that. My point was that people who do know precisely what we are talking about here like Alex ( he is a military expert afterall) are pretending like they don't know what Russia is talking about. And that's a dangerous thing... That is precisely a propaganda narrative which they are trying to convey for certain reasons with malice intentions...
    1
  23. I was the only one that had liked your comment.
    1
  24. So they've decided to catch up to the vastly superior Su57M (which is currently the best fighter jet in the world).
    1
  25.  @Lifes-little-moments  F35 is not an air dominance jet. There are currently only 3 jets of that role. F22, J20 and Su57. The F22 is now the worst of the bunch.
    1
  26. More like 10 years with a stall in the middle of 2000.
    1
  27.  @msytdc1577  The idea of a seat belt is that you are supposed to use it on tough tracks. That's the whole point. And the only action the F22 has seen is popping up that balloon. Like riding your car down the road, instead of just walking there for 5 minutes.
    1
  28.  @spartanonxy  I'm sorry? no improvements??? and what about a fly by wire controls??? and air frame doesn't have to be stable anymore as the computer stabilizes it's flight automatically... that's pretty revolutionary in on iftself. Every generation matters!!! Stop downplaying gens. 3rd gen radars and missiles. That's pretty important too!!!
    1
  29.  @spartanonxy  how is fly by wire not revolutionary? Do you know what that even is? That's as revolutionary as it gets. Moreover it was a key factor and a prerequisite for the 5th and 6th gen autopilot and autonomous flight - drones. Without that fly by wire for the 4th gen, it would be impossible to make 5th and 6th gen crafts. It's as revolutionary as moving from propellers to turbo jets, a new era of aviation ( and actually, consequently a new era for the humanity, as the fly by wire is slowly dripping into the consumer market and cars, we are all as consumers are benefiting from it... and it all started in the 80s from the 4th gen fighter jets) i. e. the new gen.
    1
  30.  @extraordinarytv5451  ?
    1
  31.  @FlacoFlo  they don't have "the touch in the avionics" only because it's being trashed by western bloggers every single time... like it did again in this video as well. It has just as good avionics or better than it's western counterparts. It also has more built crafts than that, but what's the number of crafts got to do with how good they are? at least they are being built unlike the outdated F22 which is slowly getting retired day by day... Su 57 IS the best 5th gen fighter craft and it is proving that every single day on the battlefield. Nothing comes even close.
    1
  32. @ why is the truth funny? it loses to both Su57 ( the best 5th gen craft in the world) and the J20.
    1
  33.  @opairsoft8100  and you are even funnier. What's being merely damaged on the ground got to with with the craft itself? Mind you it has THE PERFECT. Service life outside of that unrelated to service scratch which has been already repaired a long time ago. Su57 is the ONLY 5th gen fighter which hasn't been lost yet once (for any reason) since it first entered service. And it has been extensively used too. Unlike with it's counter parts , and it hasn't been shot down or malfunctioned once. Which is impressive in of itself. Which makes it by far the best 5th gen fighter, the only one that had done that...
    1
  34.  @Xenomorphine  India wanted the transfer of technology of the BEST fighter jet in the world, and they almost got it. As it would have been the most crucial technological transfer in the world at this point... Ofcourse Russia didn't end up doing it. And India got nothing to say here, Russia didn't want to transfer the technology to the best fighter in the world which no one else in the world would be able to build ( let alone India). Also it's being used in the modern conflict EVERY single day. It flies every single DAY, in and out of the combat zone, which is why it is the best. Nobody else can do that. And it hasn't malfunctioned once, having the perfect track record. It hasn't been destroyed a single time since it entered service. The on an airbase was a fluke to being with (which was called out by me many times, pretty sure, almost under every single video of it claiming to be destroyed... which is again not true). That craft has been repaired already and is already flying and is back in service. Also there are several videos of it flying in an combat zone for its missions, none of them are allowed on the platform for obvious reason. Because it makes it look good... LOL that's what is going on here. Because it is the best 5th jet fighter in the world, and the only way it is possible to combat it is with pure propaganda. LOL RCS is a whole another topic which has been discussed a million times already. Its good enough for it to fulfill it's primary role of air dominance which proves it's capabilities every single day on the battlefield (unlike every other 5th gen fighter jet). And it's already filled to the brim with it's export contracts, they just don't have the production capabilities at the moment and are thinking of scaling it up even further... mind you the Su57E is an outdated version of the Su57 and everyone still wants it, even in it's far less capable form... and India also wants it to be produced in India as well... I don't know what Russia will end up doing in the end, but you can clearly tell that everyone wants it, as there are many other contractors that are willing to purchase it, the only obstacle is it's production numbers, and Russia is now in the talks of scaling it up. Precisely of it's insane demand even in it's far less capable form, which proves that it's the best fighter in the world.
    1
  35.  @Xenomorphine  It has been used and is being used as we speak. The only reason why people don't know it that is the only way to combat it is with lies and propaganda. As there are plenty of videos on other platforms of it being used in the conflict.
    1
  36.  @yulfine1688  all of it is a lie. including your claim on the patent. It flies in and out of the combat zone on a daily basis, including the Su 57, and there are plenty of videos of that. One of the recent videos are actually from Sudzha of it's helicopters and Su25 flying over it. Russia does so constantly.
    1
  37.  @FlacoFlo  We've went through this a million times already with different people. Yes it can see 360 around itself. It's not all about the stealth. And those inlets are again, stealthy, in it's own way, it doesn't have to be the western way only. At this point I'm repeating what I've already said a million times in the comment section. You guys might actually want to start reading my messages before posting the same questions over and over again.
    1
  38. Can we all please just stop calling it an F/A18, it's so inconvenient just call it an F18. I do agree though with upgrading older planes... and at this point I don't really see the alternative... By the time NGAD releases it would cost 400 - 500 per mil. per plane... so I would much rather upgrade like 10 F15's with that money...
    1
  39. Proud of the worst 5th gen "fighter jet" in history? LOL. F35. I give it that it's probably the best short range bomber (if we are speaking in terms of the capability and not it's price, because it loses in price...), but it's the worst, supposedly 5th gen fighter jet, in the world. All the way. The TR0 was a flop, the TR1 was a flop. The TR2 was kinda OK but it's capabilities were majorly h. capped. Now nobody wants the TR3 upgrade, everyone is eagerly waiting for the TR4 which was supposedly what it was supposed to do from the get go... but no guarantees... It's a good enough short range bomber, but flops at everything else. Which is my suspicion was done so on purpose - to iron out the new type of warfare and tech. But the funny part is that people are praising this flop of a plane. LOL
    1
  40.  @NPC123UH  pretty much 👍
    1
  41. It's never been shot down, because it never flew over a dangerous enough adversary.
    1
  42.  @AvocadoAfficionado  The Su57 has been proven already in it's stealth capability even in this video. That we have a confirmation that it flies at least 30 km INTO the enemy territory, and it hasn't been shot down once ( unlike every other Russian plane). Which proves that it's the best plane in the world nothing even comes close. The F35 never even come close to the level of hostile operation that the Su57 puts itself daily. It's not even a competition.
    1
  43.  @jonathanbowen3640  Everyone that is competent thinks that it's a 5th gen jet. Everyone who is not competent online .rolls and armchair generals, think they know better. As RCS is a made up number. There are different RCS values for different angles, different ranges and different radars and wavelengths, on top of that, no 1 can really test it out themselves, everyone relies that authority to some online forum. On top of that. All of the RCS values, that you were hearing online are completely made up!!! Like the F22 0,0001 supposed RCS was completely made up, and doesn't have any base in reality. We have a physical proof that it's stealth is working that it now has been officially confirmed to fly inside the front lines 30 km into the enemy's territory. And it hasn't been shot down once. The only fighter plane in the Russian military that hasn't been shot down is the Su57. No matter what kind of stealth it has, it has been proven to be working better than the rest of the planes. The Su57 is the next gen fighter plane. It just entered full series production. This year. It is the future of the Russian (and to some degree worlds) next gen fighter aviation... the best in the world. It's not important how many there are, more important is how many is being produced. And it's 24 planes for the Su57M, 120 planes for F35A and 120 planes for J20A. Roughly 5 - 6 times more, at the moment. But considering that Russia has a much higher plane readiness numbers and that it's a much better plane overall. Those are comparable effectiveness numbers, or are not that much behind (certainly not 100 times) and remember that Ch. is an ally of Russia too... Indians didn't give up on it. They wanted the transfer of technology, like with everything else. Like Russia did with space rockets, with T90, with AK's with Brahmos and etc. they wanted the transfer of technologies of the best plane in the world. Which nether them or anyone else for that matter in the world would be able to build. That would have been traitorous if Russians had done that and transferred one of the best and unique technologies in the world to Indians. So Russia didn't do it. (but it was considering it at some point). It would have undermined not just Russian interests but the whole worlds. It is much more beneficial for Russia to sell "older" yet just as good planes for now. The Su30 series and MiG planes. Than to transfer the best plane in the world to them, so that India would become a leader in fighter jet technology and it would stop relying on Russian fighter jet imports as much. Would have been the biggest mistake in it's export history IF Russia had done it. That's why it didn't do it. And not because of India. Everyone wants that aircraft but Russia doesn't sell it. It only recently started sort of promoting it ( the export version is called Su57E), however it would start selling it after it had satisfied it's own demand within Russia first which would happen at the very least after an SMO, but most likely even later... For a simple reason, that Su75 is a much simpler plane, and they can get higher margins $$$ ( per plane) on it. So selling Su75 would bring them more money, than selling Su57, and hence why they would probably focus on that, and keep the Su57 for domestic use for the time being. It's engines are upgraded already. And yes, Russian fighter aviation and strategical aviation industry is going to be the best in the world... Nothing can even come close.
    1
  44.  @Nr15121  He started by saying that we shouldn't speak in absolutes. And he did exactly that at the end of the video.
    1
  45.  @2Potates  and who told you that... let me guess? Dems and their media?
    1
  46.  @OtherTheDave  It's in official series production as of now. 20 - 24 crafts per year.
    1
  47.  @kaijenkins4513  lol talking about confirmed kills and then switching to a long list of "reliability issues"😂😂 LOL it has none mate.
    1
  48.  @kaijenkins4513  lol wth? They've had AESA since the beginning since Su57 had entered service. It is absolutely the best 5th gen fighter jet and it's going to get proven with time. Just like the T90 did... Just like the AK47 did etc. It's going to become one of the iconic Russian things.
    1
  49.  @kaijenkins4513  lol who told you they didn't install their AESA yet? Because they were WRONG lol. It flies with AESA on it's daily missions now. That cardboard thing was also made up. It is the BEST tank. The most produced, the most sold, the most modified tank of the 21 century!!! That alone makes it the best. It is also the cheapest, the easiest to maintain, and the one they can produce in masse. Nothing even comes close to it. It's simply the best. The same goes for the Su57. And well the AK47 is too is the most used rifle and the most recognized rifle in the entire world. It doesn't need introduction. Nothing comes even close to it. The Su 57 is just at the beginning of it's journey. The T90 is in the middle of it. But they would both gain legandary status eventually... it just takes time... decades even. For the recognition.
    1
  50.  @danahebdon6810  5th gen is not only stealth. And it is the best 5th gen fighter.
    1