Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Thunderf00t" channel.

  1. So he is a Christian? and you got a problem with that? Why does that matter.
    1
  2.  @js2567  I've got to admit I don't know him much. But I'm willing to bet you are making alot of assumptions about him that are wrong.
    1
  3. @ Those were just some of the examples of cuts lol... This is literally why america is going down. This is precisely the reason. The absolute leftists fascists mindset not understanding that they are the bad guys in this trying to shut down Trump lol. ( and yes he is not perfect, he is a typical politician, but at least he's not a fascist/communist like leftists are)
    1
  4. there's so much pain and suffering which was inflicted on me by the left's fascists , so much terrorism and oppression... That the level of delusion of the leftists is beyond belief. They'd surpasses the austrian painter at this point and they don't realize it and don't care. They would perpetuate an endless suffering and oppression of the people including me, until Trump comes and stops it... and even then they try to stop him... pure evil worse than austrian painter.
    1
  5.  @SilverMe2004  That is just pure naivety. I've been in this thing for 20 years. I know precisely what I'm talking about. Seeing it drift into what it became now for 20 years... since 2014 ( I also remember some of the highlights, which people were upset about for a month, then forgot about throughout this whole time...) So I know exactly what I'm talking about. So please tell me, does it appearing for 20 minutes and later not appearing (with people responding to it) after 20 minutes, account for it "not registering on the server" lol... I know what I'm talking about because I know certain words already, which I'm not using which trigger it, as well as other things ( it is hard to keep up with everything these days, since with the help of AI it changes and updates constantly almost "on the fly"). So it far left ideology at this point... And it's got nothing to do with being too "right". If the other point of view is NOT EVEN ALLOWED to be discussed. That is PRECISELY the definition of a FAR LEFT. Not being allowed to discuss the other side ( let alone take it). And yes. I am not saying 90% of the words and what I want to say, because it is not allowed to be discussed. That is the far left by the very definition.
    1
  6. Yep, that's the precise definition of social engineering and controlling of masses. They create an alternative reality which everyone caters too. And people who don't cater into it ( like me), they just censor... So they create an alternative reality of a complete bs
    1
  7. It's $1 bil per launch so far and not $300 mil
    1
  8. My exact first thought about it as well lol. It literally has no clearance. Also seats backwards? It kinda gives it away, that it's not for general purpose roads, but more like riding around a movie set or a studio at 20 miles per hour (30km) at best, unless they change the design completely. 2) Those walking robots were mildly impressive, but engineers were surrounding them the whole way and clearing a predetermined path for them. I guess that's some progress, but to actually make 'em fully autonomous and viable... would take ALOT of work. 3) The most plausible one out of all was the robotaxi, just because there are many companies that are trying to do the exact same thing at the moment. And everyone agrees that there's a huge demand for it... But can he make this robotaxi work? Hard to say... also his cents per mile were not calculated correctly.
    1
  9.  @rebeccaaaaaaaac  Why couldn't they have returned them earlier?
    1
  10. @ "scheduling" got nothing to do with it. SpaceX as Musk had said it himself, could have done it much earlier, if only they'd allowed him to do it. Also the Russians could have returned them in one of their MS missions. It was PURELY political decision - disregarding the human wellbeing and essentially their voters too. Purely political decision for politicians sake.
    1
  11. 2:52 this is legit heart breaking. How is this legal?!?
    1
  12.  @Octuly  Not that they couldn't do it. It's that there weren't much reason to it. Because 'mericans already landed on the Moon.
    1
  13. Great video as always👍. Little known fact, Russia has the cheapest and the most reliable rockets in the world. The new Angara A5 rocket is projected to cost at around 2 billion rubles ~ 20 mil USD per launch when it gets into the full series production phase, per 25 - 40 tons payload. Which is around $1k USD per kg, so a human would be like a 100k. And it gets even better efficiency on an Amur type rocket, with a potential of up to $100 per kg. So they could be gouging and competing at any price. As nothing can beat Russia in terms of cost per launch in space, only the politics and politicians could stop it from dominating the market... But it means that the domestic market of Roscosmos has an absolutely staggering potential... With the highest efficiency...
    1
  14. Humans are much more epic and exciting. And it would go into history books for everyone to remember like Gagarin did. Also travelling with robots is extremely complicated. Basically you need an advanced AI robot to do everything. Because the delay ( ping) is literally several minutes. Then there's a question of morality arises. It has to be a conscious AI robot exploring it, and sending us the data... When does a human arise in all of this? besides creating the robot in itself? It would eventually be remembered and thought of as "robots did everything", when machines will eventually take over humans... etc. So in my opinion, it is very important to have a physical human being. Accompanying a robot, on other planets.
    1
  15.  @VColossalV  mate... you realize that any test that you do is a scientific data which is always useful and therefore a success or at least you could always call it a success... that's the whole point. However we are not talking in terms of scientific data, but rather from usefulness perspective of a working Moon rocket that they promised for NASA . There's literally almost 0 progress towards that ,any useful progress for sure.
    1
  16.  @VColossalV  Mate you can collect data even when you are just walking at the street. Doesn't mean that your walking is a success. It doesn't progress towards anything useful. There's a huge gap walking towards a pit and walking towards the oasis. Both of them are progress and both bring useful scientific data, that you can always call a success. At the end of your walk you will either end up in a pit or your own and personal paradise. Musk is going towards a pit so far.
    1
  17. Please make a new video about Elons new Robot bs :))
    1
  18. Do they scratch their ass with billions of taxpayers money too?
    1
  19. Those companies are just the US government affiliates doing their dirty job and the dirty job of the pentagon. The spaceX was planned originally to be used by the military, and it is serving that exact purpose as we speak. (with conflict in Ukraine)
    1
  20.  @karatos  While I agree with you for the most part, however, the Starship program wasn't a total failure. At least not yet. They did get an improvement on the second launch, and also all engines had lit up. There was a successful separation, and also it had used 90% of it's fuel correctly. So there were admittedly some success even though the mission itself was a failure. And more importantly, the program is still ongoing.
    1
  21. Mate , first of all their goals for that mission were bogus, but even those goals they weren't able to achieve. Mind you 1 launch of that rocket costs like 20 Soyuz normal launches.
    1
  22.  @platoplat498  all of what you've said has been achieved before. The only achievement is that the N1 Russian rocket was able to fly for 2 minutes, while Starship flew for 8 minutes.
    1
  23.  @platoplat498  It was a super heavy rocket with 30 engines though. That's the point. That it's only accomplishment compare to N1 was the stage separation and flying 4 times as much as the N1 (8 minutes vs 2 minutes). Which is not much progress considering half a century of rocket development and especially using modern day computers and AI. Engineers back in those days just used pencils and rulers designing their rockets.
    1
  24.  @hans-joachimbierwirth4727  besides that, Russia is capable of producing nukes. So saying that Russia doesn't have any... Outside of it just being a blatant lie without any actual substance , is actually an invitation for NATO to start a nuclear war with Russia. And there's something wrong with Thunderfoot by even saying that. Just imagine if there was youtube in North Korea, and you started saying that Kim doesn't have a working nuclear warhead and that it can't reach the US... Just by saying that provocative comment I would have sent him to Kim... There's no reason to be that provocative about something which is that serious... Russia has the most amount of nukes out of any nation. Even if only some of it works ... It will still be enough to wipe out anything... And one of the targets will be the UK , which has been provoking Russia since the begging of times and which is what Thunderfoot (he is British) is doing personally again with his comments...
    1
  25. Been waiting for this !!! Thanks so much Thunderf00t!!👍
    1
  26. They supposedly have different versions of the Starship they are only flying the first "V1" version of the rocket for the tests, which apparently can't carry any payload to the LEO. Supposedly they are building two V2 rockets right now, which supposedly would be capable of carrying, 100+ tons to the orbit. They have four or five V1 rockets left, so apparently 4 or 5 more failed "testing launches" after which there're supposedly going to get a better designed rocket... but that is all supposedly and quite frankly not guaranteed.
    1
  27. 100% of the Rus. nukes are functional. Don't listen to the clown head Thunderfoot in that regard.
    1
  28. @ that's the definition of fascism, leftists proved it yet again who they were to begin with.
    1
  29. 👍👍
    1
  30. You should watch his live streams of launches instead of whining in the comments. He celebrates the achievements every single time when it's due, but also points out the lies of his.
    1
  31.  @liamnehren1054  I'm not from the US either, frankly doesn't really matter to me who wins, I'm just enjoying the show. However Trump is definitely a more sane person in this. ( can't even go over why that it because 9 out of 10 points are censored by youtube... AND THAT IS WHY HE IS BETTER. LOL).
    1
  32. He is also ignoring the fact that Russia is capable of producing it in the first place... He had implied that all of the Russian nuclear weapons are from the USSR which is just plain wrong. Russia had officially modernized 100% of it's nuclear arsenal.
    1
  33. I sincerely doubt that supposed 250k per engine cost. However, the rocket is not just it's engines. It's the whole package that counts including servicing it. So far the rocket costs $2,5 billion. And for the next year, he is asking for $250 million per Starship rocket of external funding. So $250 mil is the actual price of the rocket... that is IF everything goes according to plan.
    1
  34. No, because he is speaking out of his a. Like any amount of research would tell you that Russia is maintaining it's nukes well enough, and had reported to have modernized them 100%.
    1
  35. Humic Extract is literally "black soil". They are selling water with like a small grain of dirt dissolved in it... lol
    1
  36.  @roger5059  just fyi I'm not from America. It is obvious that people assume certain things based on predispositions that they have, and they don't realize that other people with completely different views... that they haven't seen and haven't categorized yet - exist... I am not one of the people that you think I am. I was making a different point.
    1
  37. The funny thing is that most likely no. But the next decade actually looks good. That's when Russian and Chinese moon missions get into high gear, and probably Space X would go bankrupt by then and they would hire NASA to do the full Moon mission for them too.
    1
  38. I havent seen them in a long time.
    1
  39. It's not that hard to get it on Mars. We've been sending rockets to Mars for a long time. The question is Human landing ( and getting it back)... that I question very much. I don't think it is possible with the current tech. But sending a rocket to Mars is relatively easy.
    1
  40. You forgot a more important factor. China had team up with Russia. So they are going to achieve it ( together with Russians).
    1
  41. Yeah, already grey hair on his head start showing.
    1
  42. Something tells me he is in sync and works fully for the government. Hence why they cover him and his delays with those silly reasons...
    1
  43.  @-xirx-  common sense? since when it is common sense to oppress the majority? That's communism. Not common sense,
    1
  44.  @jacksons1010  pretty much yeah. But so far we don't know what we don't know. All of this is speculative, including refueling. Because he could always say that it was an experimental design... (which we weren't told in the beginning). The supposed V2 design is supposed to work. Which supposedly will be launching in 2025. But we don't know. Until we see a V2 performance and it getting to orbit. It's hard to project on anything else. There's a chance that it would blowup on a launchpad. And we will be waiting for the V3 design anyway...
    1
  45. "disaster of command and control" ahahaha
    1
  46. There are only 2 explosions so far as there were only 2 launches of the Starship. Or you do count booster and a rocket separately?
    1
  47. @ you missaw that those were the radical leftists that were trying to destroy the world, not Musk.
    1
  48. Unfortunately that's the world that we live in.( At least in the capitalistic ideology ) People with more money than sense will be doing stupid things, where eventually one of them manages to gather a team of actual real engineers that will manage to deliver on 1/10 of your original promises so you don't look as foolish anymore (that's what happend with SpaceX). If you need anymore proof just look at your typical billionaire real estate tastes, useless designed houses with so many rooms that they never even visit in their lifetimes, with gold plated furniture that you can't even sit on, cold stone floors and walls which make you claustrophobic , yet it's supposed to look cool and lux because it's a rare black marble etc etc... Times like these you realize why the Russians did the socialists (communist) revolution back in the 1917 against the bourgeoisie (upper class) except back then it wasn't as sever as in the capitalistic US now.
    1
  49. Also the seats are placed in the wrong orientation.
    1
  50. Great video as always, thanks TF.
    1