Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Thunderf00t" channel.

  1.  @imogenwren  That's simply not true. According to their original plan the rocket was supposed to splash in waters near Hawaii, and the booster was supposed to softly land in sea near the launch site. They did not achieve either of those goals.
    1
  2.  @imogenwren  I know what a soft touch down means, and it was not achieved. Either way it is all just pointless talks at this point. We shall wait and see for the third Starship launch...
    1
  3.  @imogenwren  yes, and they didn't achieve that.
    1
  4. More like a few thousand .
    1
  5.  @nathanjora7627  I mean Jesus Crucifixion was iconic. We are still living by those principles that he had laid out 2 thousand years ago... regardless of whether it was true or not or whether you believe in that or not, we are still living by those principles laid down 2 thousand years ago and build our civilizations around it, so that's pretty iconic imo.
    1
  6.  @nathanjora7627  That is precisely what Jesus had taught. And it's a pity irony that you don't understand that. Before Jesus there was no concept of individualism. He had brought it up, popularized it as a religion and made it a thing. It's you and the God relation and not your king or your master. Before that time, with example of ancient Egyptians. You didn't belong to yourself, you belonged to the king. Hence why when the King died you had a whole suit of his slaves follow him into the grave... as people didn't realize that there could be another way of living... Because there was no concept of individualism back then spread into the masses before Jesus. That's the whole point. And we've based our calendar around that, honouring him and his teachings... and it's a pity that people of the western world don't even understand that.
    1
  7. Pretty much. After he'd realized that his prediction of him going bankrupt in 5 years wasn't going to happen, because Trump got it's 4 year term, he went absolutely mad with him lol... He also skipped one of the fun parts, which I had actually enjoyed before, his live streams of Starship IFT launches... Perhaps, just in case it goes well, he doesn't want to be there lol ( all this time pretending that he actually cared for the engineers if they had accomplished something but not Elon... yeah it was all bs from the get go... he was there to just see Elon's rocket crash and burn, and didn't care about the engineers in the slightest). And now just trying to find any reason for more h, tered on Elon. Which is sad, because I absolutely loved debunking vids
    1
  8.  @professionalspaceenthusias3024  so can you tell us when are they going to achieve success?
    1
  9. I do not understand why people bury themselves up. Like how hard can it be to be neutral on politics, when discussing any topic really. But for some people and channels it's literally mission impossible.
    1
  10. It's been in the recession since 2020. It's just that every credible source and freedom of speech was silenced. So they were able to lie it out. The recession itself was a known fact for a long time. It's the question whether they would finally tell the truth or not. That's the only question.
    1
  11. Being spectacular doesn't mean that it's of much use. Zeppelins were spectacular too but it went nowhere. How about show us actual progress. That does at least something useful that it's supposed to be doing in the first place.
    1
  12.  @mstecker  I am doing more for interplanetary travel than Musk , why aren't you praising me then. Musk does not help advance interplanetary travel.
    1
  13.  @kennethferland5579  there were only 2 full Starship launches so far. I know that we can't extrapolate with only 2 inputs in data. That's why I said that I'm waiting for a third launch. You need at least 3 to do a basic extrapolation.
    1
  14.  @Fred-gu6pk  The polls are made up. So it doesn't really matter.
    1
  15. You could easily program something like that to the Elon Musk levels with no problems. It will just take time. The problem is exactly the next step making, it fully autonomous , which is practically impossible. ( Though I know how to theoretically do it, but the reality is, Musk isn't even doing any of the right steps to potentially make it work, he is literally a hyped up sales man with no talent or reason, which over hypes things and then gives his "idea" to other engineers to solve for him, and it never worked except for the SpaceX)
    1
  16.  @nowhere529  The worst part about the d. state is not that it's branched out all around the world, in different states and govs all around the globe. But that there are actual PEOPLE who bought into their agenda. Even rational thinkers like Tfoot. Try battling that...
    1
  17.  @electric7487  lol you are a brave man. As soon as I saw that success vs failure war on wikipedia, I was like nope... I'm not doing it, and left. 😂
    1
  18.  @robertkirchner7981  not good is an understatement. She is a puppet of the d. state. Trump is at least independent - not connected to the d. state. So choosing between the two, Trump is an obvious preferable choice...
    1
  19. @ You realize that Stalin literally fought for what the Dems are fighting for? The communism started in Russia with absolute DEI that absolutely destroyed Russia. The Dems are roleplaying 100% communists now.
    1
  20. @ That's precisely why the d. state got rid of him. Yes the d. state are the leftist commies. They are doing the exact same thing. Also Stalin was being directed for the most part by the d. state of the communist state of USSR. Literally the exact same thing happening in the US... the EXACT same.
    1
  21. @ There's been plenty of proof including both from the official gov. department and it's spokesperson . How is that a propaganda? Did Dems not supports a woke and DEI agenda? Have you guys gone blind?
    1
  22. Starlimk purely relies on the SpaceX. If it fails then Starlink fails too.
    1
  23. I wouldn't even say mostly... he is right on some stuff. But not mostly.
    1
  24. Where's a new video. Roasting Elon Musk with his update on the Starship would be glorious. Albeit he did promise to launch it in Feb (this year) and that it should 100% work this time...
    1
  25. I know that point of view is popular among many scientists but I don't agree with it. No robot will explore the surface of another celestial body like a human would. The Moon perhaps is the easiest of them all, and is more just a gateway to other planets... But going to anything beyond the Moon i. e. Mars, you would have massive signal delays, which makes any proper exploration mission really difficult to do. Robots ofcourse can do most of the job, but definitely not everything.
    1
  26. Well said. 👍 Pretty much, he reiterated all of the lib. media lies. So I know exactly what channels he is watching now... And also, his opinion is no different to any other lib. media outlet. So I don't really get it. He used to fight the pop. lib. media, and now he is on their side somehow, thinking that that time those libs are right... I really don't get it. But oh well..
    1
  27.  @TwitchyMofo  It's much more complex than it looks that's the point. Take fighter jet planes for example. Right from the first or second gen jet planes and their engines, you already knew what the next couple of gens would look like ( with slight deviation on the direction, but the basic principle remains)... Supposedly dreaming of an F22 in 1960s... It is absolutely possible in theory, but you know that it's a different gen of vehicle and you can dream about it, and work towards that goal... but in reality, your actual practical plane that you CAN build would be an F14, so thinking of building an F22 in 1960s is counter productive. The technology is not there yet. Same thing with Starship. It's completely different design, pretty much a new gen (or a deviation of gen) of rocketry... It is not really possible to build it at that time... And certainly not in 2022 as he had originally promised.
    1
  28.  @TwitchyMofo  Metal has also been around forever doesn't mean that it's the same thing as a rocket.
    1
  29.  @TwitchyMofo  33 raptor engines in one system working as one (and potentially succeeding). That's new.
    1
  30.  @TwitchyMofo  It's size is new, with that many engines. My F22 analogy is perfectly fine. You have a theory where something in theory is possible like fission reactors. But the technology is not there yet. There's no reason claiming that you would be able to do it. Falcon 9 and falcon heavy is a worked out old tech, Starship is not. Nothing of that size with that many engines had worked before. Every single engine that you add to the craft or a single frame, creates additional oscillations to the system, trying to manage that symphony of vibrations with so many points that could break or could come in resonance with each other is an incredibly difficult task. That's what happened to the N1 rocket as well. It was riddled with the same problem as well. So far Musk did only slightly better than N1. We shall see how it will turn out in the end, but make no mistake, it's an incredibly difficult challenge which hasn't been done before. It is much easier to have 2 - 4 big engines, to make it work right, than to have 33 engines work as intended.
    1
  31. There was nothing new in the Falcon 9 rocket, everything on it has been done before. However Starship is a different beast, which is exactly why there are no guarantee of a success. It's the largest rocket ever created by the human kind, which uses small engines, instead of a more reasonable approach with largest engines. The closest thing to the Musk's rocket is the N1 rocket , but Musk's rocket is twice as large. There is no guarantee that it's even possible, unlike how it was possible with the Falcon 9, which is a copy of any other modern rocket in the world.
    1
  32.  @legeek-l6p  It has been done before, just not commercially (landing part) , and everything else especially, the rocket itself was nothing new.
    1
  33. Or may be you should erase yourself from within. Putin is the only person that stood against the fascist democracy hegemony ... Which is the US.
    1
  34. He is wrong though. His videos about Slavic countries and especially Russia are always wrong.
    1
  35. Guys Tesla is not doing well I give you that. But it's far off from being a disaster and/or going bankrupt. Musk is in the gov, and he is getting endorsed by the POTUS. Also Tfoor is deliberately showing the stock price for the last 3 month, and not showing it for the full year, which would show that it just returned to it's normal price. I'm neither a Musk supporter nor a hater, just saying how it is...
    1
  36. Well he was directly inspired by the N1 he has said it himself many times. So it's no wonder that it looks similar, or kind of similar to it. However they are different. Less stages, less cone shaped design.
    1
  37. Yeah, the funny part in this is that he still hasn't achieved the orbit with his Starship (atm it is classified as sub orbital test flights), but let's be honest, he is pretty close to reaching the orbit and to deliver some kin of a payload to it... But the question remains, how much payload can he deliver to the orbit as every kg counts... and how practical is the reusability of a Starship (it's refubrishment cost and time to re fubrish). On top of everything else.
    1
  38. Lol Tf is bh that Musk is not going to go bankrupt as he had predicted because Trump got elected and he got promoted lol.😂
    1
  39. Wheres the dancing tesla robot at the end?
    1
  40. my comments got c. Ensored again fsake
    1
  41.  @benfaulkner1979  Haha, this is just gold. It's scarily close to the reality...
    1
  42.  @godfreyofbouillon966  not just that, I'm pretty sure it's one of those bots that focuses on framing them as being Russian. Pretty simple technique l. media says Russian = bad. So they go into the comment section with bots saying that Russia had benefited because of it, so they must be bad too, because the l. media said that Russia is bad. lol
    1
  43. @ he's got good charisma but he is a puppet of the d. state. He destroyed the US.
    1
  44. @ you realize that that (which can not be named) was caused by Dems of the d. state right? to begin with? Trump is literally revealing it all now.
    1
  45. That's actually a good point. Yeah I agree. It seems like his bs is finally slowly getting caught up to him.
    1
  46. That is one of the most stupidest things that I've ever heard. And no, Russia has no problem with nukes.
    1
  47.  @drakemallard1486  ...I'm a Trump fan too, what's that got to do with anything?
    1
  48. You've been spoon fed by the ukr. lies
    1
  49. I was actually expecting a Musk video... there's so much material on him lately...
    1
  50.  @davidstinger1134  it's not just about the cost and development it's also whether it is successful or not. SLS was a success SS not.
    1