Comments by "ODDBALL SOK" (@oddballsok) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. Finally a detailed book! Poulessen? I have to look out for it, appears to have many fine detailed reports. Though it specifies more precise where the miscommunications and inefficient time usage was about, it shows simply more of the habitual "cock-ups" that happen in war. And those happened with all the other battalions as well. In the end , the few hours delay and the too few men deployed didnot matter; (1) were there no SS reinforcements (few of them came via the Arnhem bridge when FROST WAS ALREADY THERE but let them pass) then the one battalion could still take the bridge. (2) were there so many SS coming over the Nijmegen bridge north side (that they were too much to be attacked as historical on 17th and even attacked on 18th) then no one or two or three US battalions would hold out at Nijmegen ramps for two days (maybe one day, and only the city buildings NEAR the south ramp, but NOT the northh ramp at Lent). It takes some time (couple of HOURS) to dig in, and especially set up the few 6 pdr guns...if they were able to deploy them there in short time (508th PIR had ATs?). And even IF 50% of first drop 82nd had been moved on Nijmegen north and south ramps...WHERE would the accumulated SS troops in Lent be doing all the time on 17-18-19-20 sept ? Let's assume for a fact that the 82nd would even hold the LENT side: Then the SS would surely make a SCREEN around it...few STUGS would be deployed (via Pannerden or even past Frosts men as they didNOT hold the Arnhem ramp..only a few HOUSES around the ramp)..the SS artillery would hammer the unprotected 82nd until 30crps arrival. But MOST SURELY the excess SS would be turned on Frost 's men and they would have been pushed out days EARLIER. So that when the 30crps FINALLY arrived in Nijmegen 19th sept they would find a thick cordon in/around Lent, a strong german artillery ..and an Arnhem that would be totally CLEAR of british airborne troops. The Polish that would land later at Driel would ve been cleared up even faster. Not even a chance for a "bridge head" in Oosterbeek for Urquhart. As for the 30crps shermans that are idle; The Guards Armoured's Coldstream Guards Group still was needed as a reserve for the Airborne division. What does this mean ? as a RESERVE ? As in drinking tea ? as in doing nothing ? as in hanging around in the back waiting for further notice and developments ? as in drinking tea? This left but two armoured groups to go across the Waal. Even those did not make it until next day, D plus 4, 21 September, primarily because of diehard German defenders who had to be ferreted out from the superstructure and bridge underpinnings." Superstructure of a bridge ? That is the metal works - The span ! That is maybe a few snipers or pioneers laying charges (like in the movie BtF..which witnesses told us was fake....) Bridge underpinnings ? That is indeed the location to set charges; pioneers; infantry thus. Why is that so hard to deal with ? Again proof that yet ANOTHER unit is SLOW and NOT AGILE enough to fight to the MAX. Hence it is very hypocrite to lay the blame of the WHOLE MG project on just the men of Gavin. (I was at the "celebrations" in Arnhem and Nijmegen last week..on the matter I only got to talk to elder guides and museum historians and they all have the same answer that the project failed on many accounts, and most of it in the planning...but one could not blame a single unit or person for it..).
    2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 59:07 yes Pienaar is reluctant..but look at this map with unbiased eye and you see "AGAIN " that england has thrown its dominion forces as cannonfodder in the jaws of the enemy: New Zealand and S.Africa....and WHERE are the english troops ? I only see gatehouse.... And Pienaar probably saw this too, felt it too, remembered the sacrifice of the other SA brigade.. The sentiment no different from 1940 when churchill URGED the french to keep on fighting in a political union IN FRANCE against ALL THE NAZI might while the english stayed high and dry in Britain (keeping their RN intact up in scotland, and more importantly their fighters and bombers UNUSED "prepared"for defense of ONLY britain... "political union"..mon cul), and would gobble up all the french dominion possessions around the globe..for "free". Result: ' non mercy'... edit: if you wld counter it with pointing to the split tank assaults of the english in the beginning assisting the south africans in the middle of the cauldron...then you forget to point out that EXACTLY the bulk of the english INFANTRY was KEPT behind out of fear of german counter PANZER attacks. The english TANKS were supposed to deal with the DAK panzers. Sort of like noble cavaliers 'rescueing'the SA troops in the middle. SA infantry butchered, and english tankers snatching the VICTORY. But why then, weren't the ENGLISH infantry sent in into the cauldron too ? And if german panzers are 'unhealthy' for english infantry, wouldn't that be true for SA infantry too ? I am sure Pienaar was present when all these decisions were taken at the expense of the first SA infantry sent in the cauldron...
    2
  27. I am no food expert, but I dont think your end conclusion is right. a) if DL not go to war with RU..then still hunger and DL people starve in 1944 anyway..even if west allies wld not have landed in france. =wrong. If no DL army active in RU then a lot less soldiers were drafted and lot less military wld have to be fed. a german worker requires LESS FOOD than a german soldier...including OVERHEAD (staff, civil servants). german soldiers demobilized and working in DL on fields wld yield MORE food. also, during the RU invasion, a great number of polish and russian POWs worked on german farmfields..less effective perhaps..but farming could take place on paper. so why the HUGE drop in farming produce? goebbels mentioned it, and it is a god given certainty: WAR IS HUNGER...always ! But interestingly goebb diary shows that there were TWO YEARS of BAD harvest in germany and in ukraine. That is nature..and this happens today as well. The DIFFERENCE is that (1) DL had no big food diversity: if weather is bad for crops then and potatoes AND wheat AND carrots etc = wasted. No alternative foods. and more importantly (2) DL could NOT TRADE with the rest of the world to BUY foods from elsewhere on the planet to compensate. .. and that is why TRADE and PEACE are prerequisites for good food supply on a strategic scale. a war can last only as long as you cld muster stocks....in 1940s techniques and national scale ...only a year at max. if not attacking RU..DL cld still continue to BUY wheat from RU (with functioning farms)...and DL wld yield also more food (cows, pigs). Facing only UK and the sea route blockades...
    2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. I think to define "superior technology" is not to tick temporary better equipment that lasted a year or two..and count who has the most. Better it is to declare certain arms technologies in which a certain country was CONTUINUOUSLY better, as it CONTINUOUSLY developed better models IRRESPECTIVE of what is encountered at the battlefields from the enemies. Germany: ahead in SUBMARINES (there was no "need "for the XXI uboot , they simply DID)... ...ahead in jet fighters (again, no NEED for jetfighters in 1941..yet developed it hard). ..ahead in ballistic Rockets ..ahead in STG assault rifle ..tanks..mwah..Panther and Tigers came as a REACTION to the russian T34 and KV1..but from then on..massive focus on improving beyond the others. ..ahead in propeller fighters (the FW109 surprised the allies...). ..ahead in (vicious) infantry and tank mines Japan: ahead in SUBMARINES ..ahead in major Battleships (notwithstanding LOW production output vs the americans..but THAT is NOT the criteria). ..ahead in Naval flyboats ..ahead in torpedoes..(though not sure about later developments of their torpedos in 1944). Italy: ..ahead in manned mini submarines.(many other operational developments...) UK: ..ahead in radiology (radar, asdic , etc.) ..ahead in prop fighters (and its ENGINE). ..ahead in heavy areal ordnance ..ahead in decryption not sure who to give medical technology (USA or UK ?) and not sure to grant the UK the radio sets technology improvements..cause more than not their radio sets FAILED in the field (ärnhem"..ahum) ..it is too late for me now..USA and SU must come later..
    2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1