Comments by "William Davis" (@williamdavis9562) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1.  @fairjust8072  Nahhh this guy isn't corrupt at all lol
    1
  2. Or to make sure we don't have a bunch of troops like sitting ducks who will for sure get wrecked if a conflict breaks out.
    1
  3.  @ASSASIN7-sd5sr  America first means America first.
    1
  4. Most of the things they do can't be debated. So they don't debate it. They'll just come up with some catchy phrase like "you're unpatriotic" and shut down the debate and continue doing what they're doing. It is a playbook that works. I remember people who wanted to debate the Iraq war were shouted down with "you're a saddam lover" People who questioned our involvement in Syria. "You're a Putin agent." People questioning our involvement in Gaza. "You're pro Hamas." Yes it seems childish but oddly enough it works, stops all debate. So you know for the future, when ever you see someone who wants to debate something and is shouted down by some label. You know some serious BS is going down.
    1
  5.  @lysanders8885  Why are you shilling for this? Are you getting a cut too from all the money stuffed in his pocket to do this? Or are you part of the interests actually stuffing money into his pockets?
    1
  6.  @lysanders8885  I'm not the one shilling for a Senator who's obviously been paid off. I think you'd have to be on crack or paid yourself to actually defend that.
    1
  7. Lets be clear, just as many Republicans are in on this. When Trump wanted to bring those boys home he damned near had a revolt in his own party. This is a uniaprty issue. Both the Dems and Reps are for those 900 boys to be used as live bait or sitting ducks out in Syria. With no clear reason given to us why they're there (at least not one that makes sense)
    1
  8. What a difficult job this woman has. She knows her boss worked really really hard to earn the nickname Genocide Joe. Yet has to pretend it isn't a thing.
    1
  9. What in the world is this guy talking about? An illegal militia group on the territory of another nation which ethnically cleansed more than 800,000 civilians in the 1990s is being disarmed. Bob thinks this is a bad thing? Interesting. At what point will the media and these politicians will ever speak the truth on any matter. I wish just once, they'd simply tell the truth. Im' not asking for one, just for the truth 1 time on any issue. I wonder how much this guy got paid to give this insane talk which is nowhere near reality.
    1
  10. If you give this man enough money, he will also read anything you write for him. If he is willing to parrot the talking points of an illegal militia which is guilty of war crimes. He will surely parrot anything you tell him to parrot. For the right price that is.
    1
  11. @ViktortheBigD. Most people are simply going to vote for what ever the fancy lady on T.V. tells them to vote for. That is simply how we now operate in this country, it is also how the people lost all power to decide the policy of the country.
    1
  12. Bot.
    1
  13. @Chesneytube1. I used to think that too but watch some of their foreign policy debacles I have to think there is a lot of incompetence going on as well.
    1
  14.  @chesneytube1  Yes patsies do what their overlords tell them to do. So what happens when the pantsies do the bidding of their overlords and what they did blows up in the overlords face? There is objective amount of incompetence going on. In many things they're simply not getting their desired results. The Ukraine war being one of them. That blew up in the face so bad, to a point it might be one of the worst strategic blunders of all time for this new globalist elite.
    1
  15. He knows that but also understands he can't say it lol
    1
  16. In the late 80s and early 90s. We were so powerful, forget attacking us, nations were even afraid to look at us funny. My my have times changed.
    1
  17. Lets be realistic, Powell was a war criminal.
    1
  18.  @MrRentgould  If you bothered reading the 84 page complaint South Africa put up, you wouldn't call it a lie so easily. The evidence is overwhelming and damning.
    1
  19. That is how it used to be. Now it's quite the opposite. Especially when you look at all the fundraising numbers. Hillary took in nearly 80x more than Trump in fatcat and corporation donations. So who are the rich backing again?
    1
  20.  @Jenacide  I'm a TYT fan, I'm not sure that automatically means I have mental deficiencies. I disagree with literally 99% of their views but I find them highly entertaining lol
    1
  21. This Syria issue was one of those things that was really eye opening for me. When Trump (the commander and chief) said he was pulling out of Syria. Then the state department said "no we're not." Then the pentagon said "no we're not." I was blown away by this, wondering who is actually in charge here? Also with a bit of research you can find out why your wife is stuck in Syria for 2 years. I pray she gets home to you and your children soon.
    1
  22. Funny how some figures on the right went from being defenders of free speech to screaming defenders of censorship overnight when the topic of Israel's war crimes came up.
    1
  23.  @RedDragon-k6r  Bush II and Genocide Joe are essentially controlled by the same people.
    1
  24. And how many examples of senseless wars do you need to see before realizing that being a war hawk if you aren't the big wigs making billions off those wars aren't in the interests of our people?
    1
  25.  @giorgosanthopoulos6197  So your entire argument is based on your paranoia that anyone who doesn't agree with your world view must be from X ethnic group? Do you have any idea how insane that sounds? I'm also not exactly sure what that dude in Ankara putting political opponents in jail has to do with slick Bob shilling for foreign interest groups. That's another horrible argument. According to that logic do you believe Bob should now shill for Russia because Ukraine has arrested all opposition media and politicians? Because that would be the logical conclusion to the argument you're making. Which again is insanity.
    1
  26. Because the big money that funds both parties along with the media simply won't allow it. Trump did the impossible and broke through. Look how hard they went after him.
    1
  27.  @user-te9ut7ms4l  If true why was so much effort put for to hide it? So much so that the FBI actually put pressure on social media companies to censor people talking about it. Think about that for a second.
    1
  28. Pretty genius move on Rand's part. He knows we'll never pull out of Syria. But he is putting pressure on the Senators and forcing them to rubber stamp our presence there. Knowing it is a difficult thing to do because they'll also be on the hook if (and when) something bad happens to those boys. Most of the people in charge simply do not care about using our young men as trip wires to start a war when ever they please. If we the people weren't so apathetic and actually make some noise over this, those 900 boys wouldn't be sitting ducks over there.
    1
  29. @Gothic, if we stay there it won't be doing them or us any favors. What ever their issues are, they have to deal with the pain until they figure it out.
    1
  30. Yes but this specific issue isn't even about resources. It is about using 900 young American men as bait, for when ever our psychos in charge want to spark a war. 900 guys, completely isolated in the Syrian desert. To do what exactly? This is all insanity.
    1
  31. I've come to the conclusion that our nation is run by psychopaths. How did we arrive at this point?
    1
  32. Yes it is true they're sitting on the oil fields. No it is not true that this oil is shipped back to America. Just getting the oil out of there and to our shores would cost more than the oil is worth, look at a map. The oil is being used to fund whatever group (in many cases terrorist organization) we feel like funding in Syria.
    1
  33. @Wanda Gray Be careful what you wish for.
    1
  34. It has zero impact on national security. They're there for reasons the public simply wouldn't agree with, if they ever bothered explaining it.
    1
  35. These types of issues have gone beyond republican and democrat. Most people have come to understand most of the politicians of both parties have the same exact policy when it comes to these issues. I'm a Republican but I would have voted for Tulsi Gabbard had she not been kicked out of the democratic party for saying the same things Rand just said. We need a third party.
    1
  36. @Diane Bailey, the official stance of the United States government is generally pro Azeri in this conflict. What a few paid off politicians say isn't going to change that. So no, the United States is not bullying Azerbaijan.
    1
  37.  @TAYLORFAN50  I don't think sending billions of dollars to foreign nations (one which is committing genocide right now) is an answer to that question either.
    1
  38. Because they don't care what we think
    1
  39. Which man? Obama? Bush? Biden? Notice I didn't put Trump on the list.
    1
  40. He is more interested in collecting money from foreign interest groups and giving insane speeches to placate them and keep the money rolling. Never mind the fact he is speaking on behalf of a group which invaded their neighbor's internationally recognized territory and brutally ethnically cleansed 800,000 civilians. He is literally complaining about the proper implimentation of UN resolutions and international law. You really can't make this type of stuff up lol
    1
  41. A bit late for that. The irreparable damage has been done this time. I don't think people understand just how bad this is, history will not judge us well. Our grandchildren will be cursing us. Ask the Germans how long a stain like this takes to wash off.
    1
  42.  @keepussafeUSA  On this specific issue most would probably agree with Natasha Hausdorff's view on this specific matter. But as a general rule of thumb I'd much rather listen to legal experts who don't have a title called barrister and hail from a nation who's national foreign policy is simply based on war crimes and has been based on such for 100s of years. There are plenty of international law experts who aren't from this completely and utterly discredited nation and it's institutions we should be listening to.
    1
  43.  @Cui-bono987  Yup, they had a plan to "reshape" the entire region and had a hitlist of nations. Followed the playbook to a T. It wasn't about stealing oil, we don't need that oil. It was about controlling that region so we'd have the rest of the world by the balls because they need that oil. Not to mention those nations happened to be the ones Israel wanted regime change in. So the elites made billions, Israel got what it wanted using our soldiers as fodder. And the average American citizen got the shaft. We're seeing this same playbook being used again. Except this time the world isn't what it was in the early 2000s. The rest of the world is pushing back.
    1
  44. They'll find some way to avoid it.
    1
  45. @VTecharry, when any nation gets warm relations with Saudi Arabia they are very careful to not announce it too loudly. No one wants to highlight the fact they're getting closer and closer with one of the most evil regimes on the planet.
    1
  46.  @vtecharrys.6981  I'm not sure how your rant goes against my post. Yes Greece is cozying up to Saudi Arabia but is keeping it quiet internationally because again it's not a good look. I get your situation, you're getting aggressive on Turkey by using those little islands to block them out of an entire body of water, I'd imagine they're not happy and Greece needs allies to keep this aggression up. I get that but it still doesn't change the fact when any nation gets close to Saudi Arabia they keep it quiet. Saudi Arabia is like that ugly girl some guys hook up with. Yes they'll date her but make sure their friends don't find out lol As far as your rant, if I was Greece I'm not sure I'd push a policy like this. What happens if Turkey reacts and all those "allies" decide not to help? What then? Another Cyprus where you guys catch an ass kicking? You're risking a lot hoping allies will always be there to protect you, dangerous foreign policy.
    1
  47. I doubt it, this open border thing is more terrifying that than. It is always open, has been open for the past 3 years with no elections on the horizon.
    1
  48. I'd imagine more than 70% are going to vote for it. And that is a low ball estimate, I would not be shocked if it is as high as 95%.
    1
  49. You actually except the media or politicians to actually state facts? lol The narratives they craft, they could make the devil look like the good guy.
    1
  50. @@user-jc4sf7gr2g Oh you mean the one Israel started when it stole people's homes, slaughtered their children and then stuffed the survivors into the world's only and history's largest concentration camp? Is that the war you're referring to?
    1