Comments by "L.W. Paradis" (@l.w.paradis2108) on "The Duran"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why don't we all admit that overall, this WAR has been a disaster, for all concerned? Putin was wrong not to try to avoid this, first by calling an emergency session of the UNSC, with proof -- which he had -- of Ukrainian troops planning another, more massive offensive against the people of the Donbass. That was the only ethical course, the only place to start. He DIDN'T start there. No free pass on that, sorry. Never. How can anyone excuse not doing everything possible to avoid this WAR (not "special intervention," my GOD).
Every war that can be avoided, MUST be avoided, paraphrasing Chris Hedges and many others. The sane ones, the ones with hearts, minds. To fail to do everything to avoid a war during a pandemic, just when people were looking forward to a more normal spring, was unconscionable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LVArturs On the contrary, the initial economic sanctions of the Russian Federation were swift (no pun intended) and literally unprecedented, and at least some people in the US/UK were sure they would cause the Russian economy to implode. When it looked like Ukraine and Russia might come to some cease-fire agreement, UK intervened directly to tell Zelensky to desist. As for "slow-walking support," first, what do you call these 12-figure appropriations? Second, what do you call the sabotage of the Nordstream pipeline? Third, suppose that what you call "slow-walking" is just a reflection of the struggle in the US between the hawks and the ultra-hawks, as well as the realization by both that the "best" they can do is bleed Russia; they cannot expect to beat the Russians. It would be materially impossible, absent changing the character of the war yet again and taking a bigger risk than they are prepared to do, not to mention that it could unravel the skein in a lot of other places, including Taiwan, the Korean peninsula, Iraq, other parts of the Middle East . . . What evidence do you have that the Ukrainian military as currently constituted -- meaning without American advisors and possibly even foreign troops -- could make use of that materiel? Do you consider any of the reports that weapons shipped to Ukraine are already being sold and turning up in places like Africa credible? I don't claim to know, I claim the reports are quite plausible.
Sorry, what you've said makes no sense based on the information I believe to be accurate. I will admit that we are all steeped in propaganda. For both the war and the pandemic, I've looked to background information from well before each one materialized. Only there have I found anything that strikes me as honest and clear. And I see no good guys in this picture.
This is quite apart from the issue of whether the Western military-financial powers should be meddling in Eastern Europe at all. You seem displeased that they are "slow-walking support," when there is no reason they should be offering that brand of "support" at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LVArturs Sorry, we've already been through that. You are wasting my time.
Your sedition scenario, after the US first supported a coup in Ukraine, is beyond laughable. So who, exactly, is the traitor? Maybe you live in an area that does not allow access to information.
Anyway, I'm going to block you from my thread. If you were sincerely interested in the truth, you'd do what everyone who has that interest does: you would consult the preeminent sources of information on Russia from well BEFORE Russia invaded Ukraine. Stephen F. Cohen at the 92nd Street Y comes to mind, when everyone present said "you don't think Russia would actually invade Ukraine, do you?" and he answered, yes, I most certainly do think Putin might invade. Those are the types of sources I use. (He died before the recent escalation of the war began, of lung cancer. Huge loss to mankind.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1