Comments by "WaterspoutsOfTheDeep" (@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep) on "hochelaga" channel.

  1.  @FelixErikson  How do you expect to make a coherent comment when you clearly have zero concept of the conversation and are just making up whatever sounds good in your head? That's called lying and hint hint that probably means you don't have anything worth saying.
    2
  2.  @AnarchoPunkChad  Ya I don't know anything personally showing that given the cross is represented by largely just wood in the old testament like with the serpent nailed to the pole for Israel to look on to be healed, or Issac representing the Son walking up the "hill" carrying the "wood" to be sacrificed and the Father provided the sacrifice a ram at the end representing the Lamb of God. Or blood, it's always in reference to sacrifice/death to something. Like death to sin or the flesh. I've never seen the trinity represented in the cross anywhere in the text. It's always fully only Jesus because he is the only member of the trinity that paid the price so it would seem that distinction is something kept on purpose to only give Jesus the glory for the work of the cross.
    2
  3.  @somerandomfatguy.3384  lol you have some audacity to even show your face again after making a complete fool of yourself
    2
  4.  @somerandomfatguy.3384  you that's who, as we've already established.
    2
  5.  @ThePewdieslender  Seeking the truth and pointing out lies is never disgusting. It's righteous and just. It's pathetic you would make such a heinous comment. The truth will set you free. Living in lies is bondage. Accepting people has never been part of this conversation. The conversation was thoughts and ideas. Even now you are still pandering. What a vile and toxic worldview. If a blind man is about to walk into the middle of traffic I'd rather save them instead of let them kill themself unlike you.
    2
  6.  @FelixErikson  If you don't understand what is written then google a resource. There are countless ones on the hundreds of supposed "contradictions." Hint hint it usually means cross referencing with another account to establish the context. The fact you haven't shows you are either too lazy or never cared to know the answer in the first place and are willingly ignorant.
    2
  7.  @VicMikesvideodiary  You got nothing clown. I was dead on the nail you got all your absurdity from zeitgeist. Sun of God equates to Son of God. lmao that's the level of stupidity you are referencing as arguments. It's all logical fallacy of false cause, and using language borrowed from Christianity to then argue paganism against it. Virtually all of it dating also long past Christianity. And unlike these pagan myths, the "religion of Paul" was based on real current events. The mystery cults were non-exclusive, Christianity exclusive huge difference. The reality is all these pagan mystery cults were largely influenced by Christianity not the other way around. Martin Luther made several heretical assertions. His opinion on what is cannon 1500 years after the fact means zilch. Revelation was widely accepted by all the early church fathers and mentioned right at the start by many. Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, the Muratorian Fragment, Hippolytus, Clement of Alexandria, Tertullian, and Origen. Go back to the circus.
    2
  8.  @scottjohnstone6204  That is absurd. It sounds like you watched that ridiculous zeitgeist movie cash grab made up by the author trying to link mythology of ancient Egypt to the biblical text. It's absurd. The level argument is Sun of God to Son of God it's so far fetched. So if you actually think there is a relation you mind want to study a little closer...
    2
  9. ​@Martin Luther Exactly. Here is one of the studies that references this profound discovery. This video explains the study and the study is referenced at the end. This is the shortest vid I could find. I'm not quite sure the finer context of the scope it has. I think a person needs more of a science background. I think it could also be in reference to all genetics of all life not just man. So in other words 666 like you are bringing up is in relation to all fallen flesh/life and tied to the fall. We see this happened since biology will be different under the 1000 year reign on Christ on earth. Maybe you can make sense if it's talking about genetics generalized or just in relation to human genetics. I think I may have misunderstood and it's all genetics. https://youtu.be/zNgt9xG3zQU
    2
  10. if that was the case there would be no continuity spanning dozens of authors writing those 66 books over thousands of years and in different languages. cool theory though.
    2
  11. Angels don't teach. They give God's word. They have no personal relationship or access to revelation of God. They literally have to watch us to see how God deals with us to get revelation about God. I believe the bible also says one day man will even be teaching the angels, or maybe it's just above angels in rank. I can't remember on that one.
    2
  12.  @petervermeer.4904  The bible says most of them look like men and their residence is heaven not earth. That they can appear meaning they are interdimensional beings and can make themself seen or not. So that is three good reasons right there. There is nothing in the bible that speaks of angels as "spiritual" or lacking a physical body. Only demons are mentioned as disembodied spirits.
    2
  13. What do you mean? There was no "deciding" what went into the bible. The bible was compiled organically overtime based on the books that the early church ended up using during sunday service. There was no counsel that decided what went in. That is a myth.
    2
  14. @Martin Luther Right also even around hundred years before Constantine, church fathers were quoting and recognized the complete canon. That is more where I'm coming from. I believe there is even some quotes from the council demonstrating the canon was established already too! Paul Maier had an article on this.
    2
  15.  @tzvi7989  Thank you for your response.
    1
  16.  @missmissingyou2550 I agree
    1
  17. A God means a mind, which means logic. Not a force of nature with random unguided process, chaos. There should be logic to be found. This is the mindset Christianity gave and Newton popularized with his publication which led to modern science because of Christianity. This logical mindset. This is what led to the rise of the West and why it never happened in the East and they stagnated for thousands of years.
    1
  18.  @StaySqueezy12  I never said otherwise. I brought up what the symbol of the mark partially represents.
    1
  19.  @TheRexhim  That profound discovery of 666 in genetics was published in a scientific paper. I found a short video that explains it and the paper is listed at the end of the video if you wanted to look into it more. I think it might actually be in reference to genetics in general in relation to all life. Not just of man. It has been awhile since I went over it. That would tie into how biology was tainted after the fail and how it will be partially restored during the 1000 year reign of Christ. https://youtu.be/zNgt9xG3zQU
    1
  20. Genesis shows the outcome of the earth destroyed by two floods fyi. Don't forget about the destruction of the earth during lucifers fall and the pre=adamic race he turned against God. That is how they became disembodied spirits. Fallen angels are not demons, they have a physical body and were never residents of earth. Neither are the two imprisoned in the same underworlds. Fallen angels tartarus, demons the pit/abyss according the the biblical text.
    1
  21.  @xaayer  How can you say I'm confused when I literally just wrote it was discovered and published. Dr Adam Zertal chairman of the department of archeology of Haifa in Israel published his findings in a paper. Can you even read English? lol what kind of a response...
    1
  22.  @rav3style  "simply" lol
    1
  23.  @rav3style  "Just because," I don't remember making such a claim.
    1
  24.  @rav3style  Neither have you established this source as "fictitious" let me remind you.
    1
  25.  @bonesrhodes3762  Your response is nonsensical given the context of what you are responding to. Reading comprehension is a skill worth developing.
    1
  26.  @jonathanl5567  If they were psychedelic they wouldn't hold continuity. They are divinely inspired.
    1
  27. He literally already did that. You can see the result in Gen 1:2.
    1
  28. Needless to say, extensive conjecture here.
    1
  29. @Mariah Lee you both don't realize the bible says the saints will be there?
    1
  30. It sounds good but I doubt it. The bible says the blood Jesus shed was gathered up and is kept in a fountain in heaven. Which is why our sins are still forgiven today, the sacrifice is eternally active which is why Christians can still claim the power of the blood and people can still be saved. Jesus being fully man and God means the blood shed cannot die and is eternal. So why would any blood be left to stain the mercy seat of a imperfect earthy representation of the real mercy seat in heaven. That is where his shed blood would only need to be. It's where God sees us through in heaven, through the blood through the sacrifice pure and holy. God does not reside on the ark anymore. No purpose of the blood on that mercy seat.
    1
  31. They represent the offices Jesus holds as described in the four Gospels. It has nothing to do with the zodiac. man-man, lion-king, eagle-divinity, ox-servant/sacrifice
    1
  32.  @ameliakoke1852  you have a seizure? maybe you should open another horoscope clown. You clearly never knew you were getting owned today lol. Christianity is the only game in town nothing else comes close theologically or scientifically. Your ignorance is not mine.
    1
  33.  @ameliakoke1852  you forget to take your meds today? rofl clown show
    1
  34. The bible says God's people will know the season. Not the exact time.
    1
  35.  @moe8577  No that isn't true. It is clearly stating Jesus and the Holy Spirit do not know the mind of the Father. The bible says in multiple places the Spirit searcheth the deep things of God. If He has to search he doesn't know. Deep calleth unto deep at the noise of thy waterspouts as my very youtube name is touches exactly on this fact. The bible makes clear Jesus and the Holy Spirit are God over and over and over and that God is a trinity. Very first verse in the bible establishes this giving the plural for God Elohim. Few verses later the text says God made man in "our" image. Only God has creation power, another example of the trinity. The list establishing Jesus and the Holy Spirit as God is extensive. It sounds like you are repeating cult doctrine.
    1
  36.  @AmandaHugandKiss411  Exactly? lmao they were far off the deep end and completely unbiblical.
    1
  37.  @catzip99  You commented to the wrong person dumdum. I never said such a thing.
    1
  38.  @Elisabeth_Hass  It's like in Revelation during the second coming of Jesus and the armies infront of Jerusalem start having their body parts melt off of them in the presence of Jesus who they are trying to attack.
    1
  39. the telephone argument has never been valid and been addressed and disproven countless times. There are countless videos and articles you could have read or watched at any point in your life.
    1
  40.  @TheRexhim  huh? how? there isn't even a face of an angel, it's clearly stated as the face of a man...
    1
  41. if that was the case there would be no continuity spanning dozens of authors writing those 66 books over thousands of years and in different languages. cool theory though.
    1
  42. if that was the case there would be no continuity spanning dozens of authors writing those 66 books over thousands of years and in different languages. cool theory though.
    1
  43. No it's a reference to the four offices Jesus holds as described in the four Gospels.
    1
  44.  @azeamonero9886  it would be cruel and sadistic if he never did such things. God is wrath, it's a righteous wrath. If someone killed your killed would you not want justice for them? That justice is righteous not cruel and sadistic. You have no moral compass to lack comprehension for such things.
    1
  45.  @Dovahkiin0117  Correct and like with everything else while studying you have to establish the context otherwise it's something called "cherry picking."
    1
  46. Bible states the common angels just look like men. No wings. No animal heads. There are different "species" of angels.
    1
  47. A text says Jeremiah hid the ark when they were invaded. So that is likely what happened end of story here and we don't know if it's been found because it's certainly hasn't been made public knowledge if it was.
    1
  48.  @5naxalotl  You got nothing clown. I was dead on the nail you got all your absurdity from zeitgeist. Sun of God equates to Son of God. lmao that's the level of stupidity you are referencing as arguments. It's all logical fallacy of false cause, and using language borrowed from Christianity to then argue paganism against it. Virtually all of it dating also long past Christianity. And unlike these pagan myths, the "religion of Paul" was based on real current events. The mystery cults were non-exclusive, Christianity exclusive huge difference. The reality is all these pagan mystery cults were largely influenced by Christianity not the other way around. Only someone severely ignorant or in denial thinks naturalism can create information, what all life is based on. That rationality can come from irrationality lmao or naturalism can account for something from nothing. There is no naturalistic explanation for life nor the universe nor the creation of the universe. Intelligent Design and thus Christianity is the only game in town. Atheism is a fairytale for those afraid of the light. Stay scientifically and historically ignorant all you want but don't come here pretending to not be. Shameless!
    1
  49.  @5naxalotl  You made the absurd comment and got called out. You have some nerve and audacity to come back and show your face still after making such a fool of yourself. You have nothing but outlandish absurd baseless accusations you are parroting from fools who made them up to make easy money off of the gullible like you.
    1
  50.  @samallyoucan  Says the clown that instantly dismisses the biblical text as an historical document when it's been found to be more accurate than secular historical records. The biblical text has been found more accurate than the historians of Alexandira. The biblical text is the only source that got the creation account correct. The biblical text has 100% accuracy of prophecy. The biblical text has had no noteworthy issue with transcription being passed on over 3500+ years. The exodus path has been discovered including where the tabernacle was set up matching the dimensions in the biblical text. Yet you want to say this one object was missing at that location and others despite everything else being correct? That logically is absurd. Then you want to argue there is no extra-biblical account of the ark as proof which also is no such thing. Secondly it wouldn't even make sense if there was, it was only 1 person a year saw besides it being stored away far less the time period it is mentioned and lack of writings and documents of that time. You don't even have an argument you are just saying whatever sounds good in your head. All evidence points towards it existing. There is no reason to doubt it's historicity what so ever. Then you have the audacity to mock belief in a God when you believe you evolved from a pool of slime that magically wrote code and manifested it's own DNA and DNA replicator and a fine tuned universe that appeared out of nothing magically manifested itself. lol have some shame.
    1