Comments by "John Adam" (@johnadam2885) on "Alexander Mercouris"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ccahill2322 Yes, I understand 'sticking with the script', and not the news, is the order even in the free world, for the free press. Noam Chomksy said the western media 'manufactures consent'.
In a recent Palestinian-Israeli fighting episode, the BBC was called out for saying Israelis were 'killed'; but Palestinians 'died'. The first implies a destructive action; the second implies no destruction, it was a natural event. Subtle but wilful distortions shape people's minds : Palestinians are fanatics, Israelis are innocents minding their business.
Israel is a creation of the British and French, and afterwards the US is its sustainer. So the western media has to project Israel favourably since it is its chosen one. Criticising Israel will point the finger of guilt on its creators.
The Ukraine war has come due to western backing of NATO expansion. But the western media is not going to question the recklessness of their own governments in seeking NATO expansion. Instead, they turn it into a holy defence of sovereignty. They did not defend Iraq's or Afghanistan's right to sovereignty. That is why the west has lost credibility, and outside the west, people back Russia.
Every statement on the war now starts with 'Russia is losing'. Afterwards, they tell you Bakhmut might fall. And they will conclude still with 'Russia is losing'.
Russia has achieved many goals : (1) Ukraine will not join NATO (2) US is not going to have missile and naval bases (3) the GDP creating part of Ukraine is taken (4) Russia controls the coastal areas and the shipping lanes (5) reconstruction of Ukraine is not possible without Russian consent and (6) Russia has strangled Ukraine's - and Europe's - economies.
The reality is frustrating and the sense of being defeated is humiliating, so people console themselves with the media telling us 'Russia is losing'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why are the British so obsessed with fighting and defeating Russia ? Whether it is Johnson, Truss, Sunak, Starmer, they are all eager warmongers who over estimate Britain's power.
What happens if Ukraine strikes inside Russia with Storm Shadow, and Russia retaliates and sinks a British ship, or lands a Sarmat missile on Britain, and the Americans look the other way ?
It seems that the UK thinks it drives US policy. The UK is merely a useful door mat of the US. Why was France not invited when its missile is the same as Storm Shadow ?
Biden is a lame duck President, he is not in a position to take such a momentous decision which would commit the US to a direct war with Russia.
After the election, if it is Trump, he will end this nonsense, he will not allow US to be run by Ukraine and UK. Even if it is Kamala, she will also slowly distance herself and put Germany and the Europeans to shoulder the responsibility for Ukraine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jackneuman5108 Russia is prevailing because Ukraine has lost 20% of the land that produced 90% of its GDP. Further, the Russians block Ukraine's access to the Black Sea. Ukraine has to ship wheat through Poland and now Polish farmers have blocked that. Russia has destroyed Ukraine's power grid. They have taken Soledar and Bakhmut. They have fortified the lines.
Russian economy is going down ? You said that in the first month. Biden said rouble will be rubble. None of that happened. Instead, Russia floored western economies. Germany is being de-industrialised. Workers in France, Britain and Germany are on strike due to inflation. No one is on strike in Russia because they cannot afford heating. Russia's economy is essentially self sufficient. Also, they have found alternative trade partners.
Your 'modern gear flowing in to Ukraine' will make no difference. You said Himars were game changers. Now the western media which said Himars were game changers say the Russians jammed the GPS and the Himars are not hitting targets. The Russians have destroyed one Patriot and damaged one out of a battery of three; this is slowly being admitted.
The western media, Stoltenberg and all the rest of the gang, said that the west cannot produce enough artillery shells to meet Ukraine's consumption. NATO has admitted it cannot ramp up production. The Russians can and have. They fired 7 shells at the Ukro Nazis in Bakhmut compared with one the Ukranians fired. Against the Patriots and tanks, they will keep attacking them with drones and the like, till the west cannot supply enough Patriot missiles. This is their tactic. It will be like the artillery shells. The Russians can turn Ukraine into a wasteland which is permanently dependent on EU aid. They will not allow any reconstruction.
As for demographics, what about Ukraine ? 30% of its population is refugees. Ukraine has lost a lot of men in Bakhmut to no avail.
The war is lost for the west. You know the saying 'Humpty Dumpty sat on the wall and fell down and all the Kinf's Men and Horses could not put him back again'. That is Ukraine's situation. The Ukraine of 2014 is not coming back, still less the Ukraine of 1991. It is gone for good. If they continue, they will lose more.
Anyhow, the west must continue out of false pride. Defeat is painful to accept. This Ukranian counter offensive is the last desperate throw of the die. It has not taken off even. Once it peters out, the US will move on to China and tell Ukraine to accept the reality.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@b1daly1 The real blame is the US and its subordinates in Europe. The US financed and supported a coup d'etat in Ukraine against an elected government, it aided groups that are Nazi like Right Sector and Azov Batallion, to stoke anti Russian nationalism. The purpose was to get hold of naval bases in Ukraine. Russia asked for a security guarantee, the US declined, so Russia stopped US machinations in Ukraine.
The US has a despicable record overthrowing governments in Latin America, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and installing puppets who it can control. That might have worked in those countries, but if you try that with Russia, they will maul.
The US sent troops to Iraq to evict Saddam from Kuwait (although the US encouraged Saddam to invade Kuwait and sold arms), so if Russia has robbed Ukraine of its vital areas, why does the US not send troops to Ukraine ?
The reason is the US and its European allies do not have the courage to fight Russia. In that case, why did you encourage Ukraine to think it could get into NATO ? The US is shameless and has let Ukraine down.
1
-
@JackSparrow-vv2uq Your thesis is built on the assumption Russia will pull out. Russia is not pulling out. It will take a part in the east, the industrial part, and control the coastal part. The rest they will bomb to smithereems.
Where did you get the notion that 'Erdogan told him to pound sand and he meekly came back into the agreement to not look more like a weak fool'. If you are referring to the agreement to allow grain shipment, that was not Erdogan. The President of the African Union visited Putin (he ignored the EU) and asked for relief on grain shipment. Putin agreed, Erdogan and UN were intermediaries. Russia at one time reconsidered stopping it, because there was news that the grain was going to Europe.
The damage to Ukraine some weeks back was $ 700 billion, it will cross $1 trillion and it will keep mounting. Russia can keep going, you will find it hard to continue with handouts to Ukraine. Seizing 300 billion is irrelevant, it is not enough. Besides, there is no way Europeans and US can enter for reconstruction, as Russia can keep the war open. If a few of you get killed, you will run away.
You have led Ukraine up the wrong path. The Ukraine of 1991 is not returning. In what form it remains will be decided by Russia, and not you. Russia has changed the western run world order for good. Only Russia could do it.
1
-
1