Comments by "Stephen47 22" (@Stephen-bq4nq) on "Военное телевидение" channel.

  1. Why?
    2
  2. It will be used against freighters after their escort ships have been taken out by longer range anti ship missiles
    1
  3. They lead the world in stealth technology and lasers
    1
  4. As a kiwi I'm appalled what a ignorant fool you are
    1
  5.  @stuartneary3067  No Russia are the Nazi
    1
  6. ​ @JohnJones-k9d No all modern MBT can destroy each other it just comes down to who gets in the first hit. The US fought well in world war 2 and they certainly didn't run away in Korea the communists were pushed out of South Korea. Vietnam was never a winnable war the US weren't prepared to put ground forces into North Vietnam so all they were doing was holding the line and they were only going to do that fight a limited amount of time at some point they were going to go home. The Chinese invaded Vietnam in 1979 and they didn't last long and what do you think would have happened to Russia if they went into Vietnam they would have lost
    1
  7.  @tonyp2865  No they're not they've taken heavy casualties in men and vehicles plus the black sea fleet has been smashed and their economy is struggling. I laugh when you Putler fanboys try to say Russia is fighting 51 countries when organisations like NATO have only used a small portion of their firepower. Theirs a good reason Putler hasn't attacked a NATO country he knows what will happen.
    1
  8. The Bradley has performed very well in Ukraine it's been the best IFV on either side. The Abrams has struggled the same as every other tank including the russian T90 because they weren't designed to withstand drone attack.
    1
  9. ​ @ronanrogers4127 the IED were big in Afghanistan
    1
  10. You could always just bend over and hold into your ankles the Chinese and Russians would love that
    1
  11. I dont know why people obsess over a vehicle getting destroyed it's war. Look at world war two the best vehicles got knocked out nothing is impervious to enemy fire. The bush master provides a good level of protection for transporting infantry and isn't too expensive. It's shown good crew survivability when hit with IED and mines but its also light enough to be mobile..
    1
  12.  @clown-hr7ic  🤡 I'm not getting paid anything the bushmaster was designed as a troop carrier which would provide more protection than a standard truck and it does that..
    1
  13.  @TomasFunes-rt8rd  they're an infantry transport they provide good protection against IED,mines,small arms fire and shrapnel. They provide a combination of protection and mobility and are much better than infantry traveling in the back of trucks completely exposed. Anti tank missiles can penetrate the armour of main battle tanks so it doesn't matter what you transport your infantry in there is risk.
    1
  14.  @BangDingOw777  the bushmaster will offer protection against 7.62mm fire
    1
  15. What an ignorant comment it doesn't matter what country you're in if you run over a mine your vehicle will get wreaked.
    1
  16.  @virginccyy7645  that's good performance It will be interesting to see what size warhead they out on it if they decide to use it in an anti shipping role
    1
  17. The S400 was supposed to take out the stealth aircraft but in Ukraine it's been getting taken out with ATACMS. Iran's russian air defence systems were taken out by F35 with not one aircraft lost. The Russians SAM systems have underperformed in Ukraine they've struggled to even defend against subsonic missiles If the patriot was so obsolete the Russians would be flying all over Ukraine at will and they're certainly not doing that they have already had aircraft shot down by patriot. The F35A can pull 9G manoeuvres it's more agile than people give it credit for.
    1
  18. ​ @ricardolevy885 they obviously did have stealth coatings in the bomb bay no doubt they do now
    1
  19. ​ @wassim-akkari the F22 was carrying external fuel tanks which affect it's stealth and agility no fighter pilot in real combat will dog fight with external fuel tanks. The typhoon on the other hand were flying in a clean configuration which maximises agility. Tell the whole story not just the part that's suits your argument
    1
  20. ​ @DrDupor Russian military technology isn't ahead of America the russian black sea fleet couldn't even defend against subsonic cruise missiles the Russian SAM systems have been getting destroyed in big numbers in Ukraine. The Israeli used F35 to wipe out russian designed SAM systems in Iran.
    1
  21. The damage the russians claim to have done to ukranian forces in kursk is laughable if the Ukrainian force in kursk had lost that many men and equipment they wouldn't have anyone left
    1
  22. There has never been an armoured vehicle in the history of warefare that couldn't be knocked out people need to stop getting so excited when a tank gets knocked out. Putin said the T90 was the best tank in the world and plenty of them have been destroyed
    1
  23.  @pharaon6718  Bullshit THADD has been shooting down plenty of incoming missiles any system will struggle to hit everything.
    1
  24.  @skip123davis  yes it's a great system
    1
  25.  @peterwilson5528  russian armoured vehicles have certainly got the whole world laughing
    1
  26.  @peterwilson5528  russian armoured vehicles have got the whole world laughing.
    1
  27. Russian armour has the whole world laughing😂
    1
  28. It will be good against freighters carrying military supplies after the escort ships have been sunk by more expensive anti ship missiles.
    1
  29. Russia didn't defeat the US or NATO they're not even on the battlefield
    1
  30. @Ha36ykBbI  funny drones are destroying Russian tanks like the T90 which Putin said was the best in the world and they're also destroying Russian SAM systems that we heard were the best in the world
    1
  31. @SG-gt3zm  type in English
    1
  32.  @vgames6792  dude give me a break the only people who talk about wonder weapons are people in the media who peddle sensationalism to get people watching. It's as bad as Putin's fanboys beating their chests about hypersonic missiles that haven't changed the war. Russia has lost a lot of men and equipment but they're a bigger country than Ukraine and always fight their opponents with mass and have no regard for casualties. NATO isn't demoralised they have new members and have only had to commit a small portion of their available firepower against Russia.
    1
  33.  @vgames6792  only the media talk about wonder weapons and they peddle sensationalism to attract viewers. The Russians have taken heavy losses because they fight with mass and have no regard for casualties but they're a bigger country than Ukraine with more manpower. Russia hypersonic missiles haven't changed the direction of the war and to say the west is demoralised is laughable NATO has new members Russia has taken heavy losses their economy is under severe stress with high inflation and interest rates and NATO hasn't had to deploy much of their military capability..
    1
  34.  @tangofox7124  go read up on the Ukrainian starved to death by Stalin in the 30's they died in the millions. The Russians have treated Ukrainian people like second class citizens they have nothing but contempt for them
    1
  35.  @TheBikeOnTheMoon  yes Stalin deleted millions of them in the 1930's
    1
  36. What went wrong is they were sent without drone protection and every other tank on the battlefield including the T90 had the same problem
    1
  37. The Ukrainian sunk a large russian warship with two subsonic missiles that arn't even designed for stealth. This missile is designed for stealth that's why it will be a concern for China. The US has successfully intercepted a ballistic missile with the SM6
    1
  38. No they're not the Bradley has proven highly successful in Ukraine the crews love the vehicle it provides good crew survivability,mobility,firepower The Abrams has struggled the same as every other tank because it was never designed to withstand drone attack and Russian tanks have suffered the same fate..
    1
  39.  @johnsilver9338  they are developing a hypersonic version by increasing the booster size it will have the same booster as the SM3. It will not only go hypersonic but have greater range
    1
  40.  @johnsilver9338  I read an article and it was stated that the US navy is going to end up with a mix of hypersonic, supersonic and sub sonic missiles which will be used based on the type and value of target.
    1
  41.  @taskforce0584  only the Russians know that.
    1
  42.  @taskforce0584  well then?
    1
  43. Russia doesn't have any game changing weapons they're simply a big country fighting a small country and their using mass to gain the advantage.
    1
  44. When Australia ends up fighting China don't expect anyone else to help you
    1
  45. No they actually work very well
    1
  46. ​ @stemup they don't need to do a mobilisation they're paying big contracts to entice people to volunteer
    1
  47. ​ @n3rdy11 no man portable anti tank weapons aren't obsolete because you may not always have a drone available to you. The western weapons like javelin ,nlaw have proven to be very effective weapons along with the switch blade 600 anti armour drone, HIMARS,Bradley IFV, TOW missile systems m777 artillery, storm shadow cruise missiles
    1
  48. ​ @georgefabian6193 the western nations only supplied a small portion of their equipment
    1
  49. ​ @stemup their propagandists were bragging it would be over quickly I've seen the video
    1
  50. ​ @Татарин-т5з the Russians weren't expecting a long war
    1