Comments by "Stephen47 22" (@Stephen-bq4nq) on "HistoryLegends" channel.

  1. Russia's latest offensive towards Avdiivka ended in disaster do a video on that
    3
  2.  @nebulongalaxus7212  It's not that NATO tactics don't work the problem is Ukraine doesn't have the weapon systems to implement the tactics
    3
  3. ​ @maxkazzora4234 they weren't goat herders a lot of them have years of combat experience and know the lay of the land. They're also able to hide in the civilian population and just do hit and run attacks avoiding major confrontations and using time as a weapon just waiting their enemies out
    3
  4. ​ @AndRei-yc3ti The US army excels in open battle using combined arms warfare they struggle against insurgencies but so does everyone else. The training the Ukrainian have recieved isn't useless they given a five week crash course in weapons handling,first aid ,basic infantry manoeuvre and house clearing.
    3
  5. ​ @AndRei-yc3ti The Iraqi military in 1991 was able to fight Iran for 8 years against the US they lasted days they were blitzed by air and land and couldn't do anything. The US military trains for combined arms warfare. In Iraqi the US weren't confined to bases they had units out conducting operations till the end. In Iraqi the militants in the Sunni triangle were defeated when the locals turned on them and when the US left not a shot was fired. No one has success in Afghanistan because the Taliban doesn't engage in open battle they just lay bombs and hide in the civilian population. They use time as a weapon they know avoid major engagements and just wait their opponents out they know they have to go home at some point
    3
  6. They run into a minefield and some vehicles got immobilized then the commander sent more to help them and they run into the same problems in the killzone.
    3
  7. ​ @s.a.t419 funny Russians were complaining that their counter battery fire wasn't effective. So much for all their firepower
    3
  8. Sounds like you're talking about Russia
    3
  9. ​ @Nottotti-eg9nf The Ukrainian have nothing to lose fighting Russia
    3
  10.  @nikolatomic5287  The Jews have had a continuous presence in those lands for thousands of years they have just as much right to live there as Palestinians
    3
  11. History legends you're a 🤡 it doesn't matter what is happening you will spin it as being bad for Ukraine. Plenty of reports from the Russian side of the fence say how bad the situation is for Russian soldiers
    3
  12. The west could increase their industrial base if they needed to
    3
  13.  @maxorogue  Pure NATO training 🤡 it was NATO who trained the Ukrainian forces that prevented Russia from capturing Ukraine.
    3
  14. @vasilijevukadinovic6843  The LRASM is simply an anti ship version of the JASSM. Lockheed Martin said the LRASM has a range greater than 370KM
    3
  15.  @jbyeats  okay russian bot.😂
    3
  16. Yes how dare they try to liberate their country🤡
    2
  17.  @hxx796  tech is only as good as the people using it
    2
  18. Do you seriously think Russia an invader and oppressor can win this war if the Ukrainian need to they can resort to an insurgency and Russia will never be able to secure the Ukrainian borders weapons will always be smuggled in and Russians will die every day. All the political puppets that Russia installs will be assassinated.
    2
  19. ​ @aaronvarela89 Russia has been killing innocent Ukranian for years so stop with your excuses
    2
  20.  @Tonixxy  yeah and the US army that fought in desert storm had no combat experience and went just fine
    2
  21.  @Tonixxy  yes it can be compared they all went into battle with no experience they relied on their training and fought well. The armies in both world wars started out with no experience and fought well
    2
  22.  @sadmoneysoulja  there was nothing good about the USSR. The Ukrainian people want to go with western Europe which is their right and the way Russia is behaving towards Ukraine and the contempt it's showing for the Ukrainian people they're making the right decision looking west.
    2
  23.  @Addi_Teacha509  no it won't
    2
  24.  @staceycolangelo8940  they did shoot it down and had photographic evidence 🤣🤣
    2
  25.  @Funtarez  the Patriot wasn't even destroyed and was repaired and put back into service. The Russian missile that couldn't be shot down got shot down that's the reality
    2
  26.  @eliasziad7864  in Normandy 70% of allied rifle company casualties were caused by mortar fire
    2
  27. ​ @jkl9984 No Russia is starting to struggle they have admitted they have ammunition shortages and their counter battery fire isn't effective
    2
  28. They will be training the Ukrainian in small unit tactics to try and help them fight mobile to reduce casualties
    2
  29.  @ayrnovem9028  the US have far greater precision munitions for their artillery to hit targets they don't need to expend as much ammunition that's the cold hard reality
    2
  30.  @ayrnovem9028  the Syrian war is irrelevant to what is happening in Ukraine. The US faces Russian artillery they would use a combination of guided and unguided artillery that's why ammunition production had been ramped up. They have the Excalibur precision munitions then they also have kits that they can put on dumb shells to make them precision rounds and they're cheaper than a Excalibur round. And some targets aren't valuable enough to use a precision round. The Russians struggled to deal with 20 HIMARS units the US has close to 400 then you add all the M777 and Paladin that can fire precision munitions which will be backed up with airpower and other long rang fire capabilities plus superior surveillance the Ukrainian firepower pales in comparison to what the US military could unleash.
    2
  31.  @ayrnovem9028  The US military has far greater logistics than Ukraine and the Russians haven't been able to stop the west supplying Ukraine. As for the explosions being spectacular yeah explosions tend to be spectacular and we have seen plenty of spectacular explosions when Russian ammunition got hit. HIMARS didn't play a minor role they were destroying Russian command and control centres with it and ammunition dumps and the Russians were crying about HIMARS so you know it was having a good effect. The Russians have struggled with a Ukrainian military that has no where near the firepower or situational awareness of the US military it's obvious what would happen if they had to face the full force of the US. The Russians would have been pushed out of Ukraine already they would have had to use nukes which ultimately would have resulted in the destruction of everyone
    2
  32.  @TonitruiDraco  the Russians can't risk any seaborne landings after their ship was sunk by the Ukrainians. Their land forces can't move south until Mauripol is completely captured.
    2
  33.  @TonitruiDraco  I think the Ukrainian forces in mauripol are doomed I have thought that for weeks. Logistics are a huge part of war you can't fight without bullets or food and Mauripol is just too isolated to support. It's still buying time for forces in the south to prepare positions and receive vital equipment. The coming month is going to be very important in this war it's vital for the Ukrainians to avoid major encirclements of the rest of their forces even if it means giving ground
    2
  34. You could say it will be as successful as the Russian attack on Avdiivka
    2
  35. I have seen it reported on multiple channels
    2
  36.  @chizhang4369  funny western soldiers are still there and fighting well I saw an interview with an American and he said of all the guys he went over there with they're all still there.
    2
  37.  @danielk8149  no he said he ended up training himself on a javelin. He fought around Kiev then when the fighting went east to the Donbas he went there as well. He was 40 years old fighting there he wasn't some young guy his son had his first birthday while he was there. People who want to pass judgement should get their asses over there
    2
  38.  @ruparkyitin  I saw it at the start of the war I don't have a reference. The Russians saw the Zelensky government as the enemy they wanted to take them down and have a russian friendly government installed. They wanted to capture Kiev that's why they deployed airborne forces to try and capture the airport near Kiev
    2
  39.  @digitalronin7787  yeah the people in Mauripol looked over joyed at the freedom the Russians brought them especially shelling them with artillery when they tried to leave the city
    2
  40.  @niccolobrioschi3758  stop coping the Russian never thought the war was going to be hard they thought it would be like taking Crimea
    2
  41.  @smoldoggy1005  the bodies in the street were seen by satillite weeks before the Ukrainian forces got back into the village the only forces in there were russian.
    2
  42.  @mohammedriadh4990  No they didn't Only a small portion of airpower, artillery and manpower from NATO was used in Afghanistan. It was also an insurgency which is totally different to the conventional war that's underway in Ukraine the Taliban avoided major engagements and relied on IED while they hid amount the civilian population. They also based themselves in Pakistan where they could operate with impunity. The Taliban basically used time as a weapon just waiting the coalition forces out they knew they would have to leave at some point. They also used the same tactics when the Russians invaded Afghanistan and the outcome was the same
    2
  43. The Russian military has been embarrassed in Ukraine the only reason they are achieving anything is superiority in artillery without it they are nothing
    2
  44.  @derg38.  there isn't any amazing about what the Russian are doing they have superiority in ground based firepower and total dominance in the air. The Ukrainian have limited ability to target russian artillery,command and control centres and logistical hubs. What is amazing is that with all the disadvantages Ukraine faces they are still standing.
    2
  45.  @Carnivalcs  that's just a cope to explain the Russian failure
    2
  46. ​ @ayapi9333 the russian economy is under severe pressure even russian economists admit this
    2
  47. ​ @WaqasAfzali-e8p 600K casualties isn't far fetched it's an average of 600 per day for the whole war
    2
  48. @WaqasAfzali-e8p  I read Russia is spending 6% of GDP on defense they have inflation at 8% and interests rates at 21% which is hurting businesses. The Russians own economists have admitted the Russian economy is in trouble
    2
  49. @WaqasAfzali-e8p  stop coping when Russia's own economists say things are bad you should believe them they know more about their economy than anyone else
    2
  50.  @VHSKacceta  1000,000 is army,navy and air force
    2