Comments by "Marc Joly" (@emjizone) on "The Russian Dude"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
00:30 Three reasons why Army Z can't use mayonnaise :
1. Mayonnaise is a French word. The first reference to this recipe dates back to 1815, by Antonin Carême, chef to the French court. Russia is waging an undeclared war against France , with the Kremlin using its resources to destabilize it politically (corrupting its allies, arming its enemies and inciting hatred, funding and influencing neo-Nazi parties), hence the rejection of anything that might strengthen cultural ties between Russians and French.
2. Mayonnaise is an egg-based sauce. Russia can no longer produce enough eggs, for some strange, stupid and unreasonable reason that has nothing to do with Russia's climate or geography, or any natural phenomenon (maybe Russian chickens don't like war?).
3. Only civilized nations with enough industrial capabilities can prepare and package mayonnaise in a healthy way so that salmonella cannot develop in it and does not cause any health hazard. It costs. To the point even the French army prefer not include it in its rations. The real danger is not a virus , but bacteria , as with any other unpasteurised egg, meat or fish-based food.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
3:51 I don't know for sure what will happen, but this "already did much" pseudo-explanation is completely nut. In general, and even more in case of war, the most important is to deliver the needed hardware according to goals, not according to the diplomatic weather or out of frustration.
If a few F-16 more to combine with the existing army give much better chances of successful missions and dramatically reduce the waste of tanks and lives, then this is what must be done. It would be very stupid to brag about helping a lot with no significant effect because one piece is missing.
I am not a military expert, but I think that the air supremacy that Ukraine has been praying for since 2014 would have ended the war already, because it would have blinded Russia even more and neutralized its heavy artillery. Well, it seems quite obvious now that the Russian army cannot conquer or even keep occupied land in Ukraine without heavy artillery.
Real experts, tell me if I am wrong and why.
I am quite sad that Europeans are wimps counting beans and comparing efforts instead of accepting what it means that the Russian government is definitely becoming authoritarian, fanatic, and clearly expansionist with not limit, literally committed to the path of world conquest at all cost and its submission to the whims of one man at all cost.
We all have learned History. We know how it goes. We all know that the more we wait the worse it get and the more it costs. Surviving it requires more than half a reaction and half a treatment.
Of course, this "no" could be misleading. It could also mean that the U.S. will supply allied countries, which in turn will supply Ukraine, or some other diplomatic ploy to give Russian spies more work.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1