Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1.  @Globeisahoaxx  Once again doofus, when is towards the centre of the globe then there is no top & bottom. Simple concept.
    3
  2.  @trailbossdan1  He's a joke...
    3
  3.  @KangenAlec  Yet again, because it travels in arc.
    3
  4. Their explanations & evidence were edited out.
    3
  5. You need to supply evidence of that and explain why the evidence disproving a FE is actually compatible with your explanation.
    3
  6.  @KangenAlec  Far too limited for the Earth to be flat.
    3
  7. More interesting question would be how NASA fooled the ancient Greeks.
    3
  8.  @KangenAlec  You’re also telling people that NASA can’t be trusted. Which is it?
    3
  9. NYC pollution aside, you ought to be able several hundred miles on a FE with the view gradually disappearing into a haze. We observe cutoffs at a horizon that is much closer. You meed to reconcile the two.
    3
  10.  @KangenAlec  Still waiting on any FE'er to explain the horizontal attraction observable in the Cavendish experiment and provide any plausible reason why there would be a "down" in the absence of gravity or a mechanism for objects to move in said direction. You profess to be well-educated in FE so why can't you answer? You think you know the answer so how hard is it to put fingers to the keyboard and actually say what it is? You're being verbose enough with your posts so you can't claim someone is preventing you . Be brave - step up to the plate and go down in history as the FE'er that revealed to the world how gravity really works.
    3
  11. It was deduced 2500 years ago.
    3
  12. That the Earth is spheroid is a demonstrable fact, not an idea.
    3
  13. Evidence?
    3
  14.  @luisdiegosalas  Personal star domes? Density is a force? A transparent extra moon that turns opaque at just the right time? If they are the thinkers they claim to be then it shouldn't take somebody else explaining to them why it wouldn't work.
    3
  15.  @VaughanMcCue  He hasn’t answered any questions or provided any evidence in the years that he has been posting. He regards questions as harassment. He’s had all his questions answered, repeatedly.
    3
  16. Basically you are clueless about how medical research is conducted and conclusions drawn. You think it ought to be based on anecdotal evidence and wishful thinking because you feel that to be more scientific than science.
    3
  17. An accurate inference in this case. You fo realise that Earth was deduced to be a sphere 2500 years ago from the motion of the sun & stars? That long before today the shape was measured (curvature included) and the surface mapped? That FE’ers bring nothing to the table but ignorance & incredulity?
    3
  18. 1. What's a telescope? 2. Out of sight, out of mind. 3. We just know...
    3
  19.  @KangenAlec  And yet none of you can produce this maths for predicting eclipses in a FE, explain what causes lunar eclipses or explain why the globe predictions are always accurate.
    3
  20.  @BG8950  A large meteor hitting the moon blasted some material into space; some later fell to Earth. That the meteorites show evidence of the heat they were exposed to and the ricks brought from the moon do not is too complex for some people to grasp.
    3
  21.  @Boss_Feed  I ask the people who think scientists are indoctrinated what they think we do in labs. I haven’t had an explanation yet.
    3
  22.  @Globeisahoaxx  Yet again doofus, there is no top & bottom to a sphere abd down is towards the center of the globe.
    3
  23.  @Globehoax  Why would a plane flying at a constant altitude on a globe need to dip or flip?
    3
  24. You mean it’s too complicated for you to grasp. Ignorance is not knowledge; that you don’t know something does not mean nobody does.
    3
  25.  @raskolnjikov1  What do you think we do in labs? Sit and think up new words to bamboozle you?
    3
  26. worthless Aussie sinner saved by grace alone The satellite has momentum that keeps it moving in a straight line. The planet’s gravity simultaneously pulls it downwards. If the satellite is moving at the right speed the net motion is an orbit around the planet. There is nothing in space to impede the satellites progress; it does not need further propulsion to keep it moving at that speed.
    3
  27. Like GiaH here FE’ers rely on “just gotta be” and “just does “to explain everything.
    3
  28. Says the guy who sells Kangen Water…
    3
  29. The FES is sneered at by “true” FE’ers who fall into the categories of moneymakers (relatively few who “believe” for as long as generates income), the trolls who just like irritate people and the genuine willful idiots who think it true and are willing to generate the income. Very few in total but vocal and eager to advocate ignorance.
    3
  30. You realise we publish methodology & data to support our conclusions?
    3
  31. Does Britain use an honest system?
    3
  32.  @Globeisahoaxx  Still waiting on you to produce any evidence…
    3
  33. They’ve been told repeatedly but they choose to ignore it.
    3
  34. Raindrops, meniscus, fountains, waterfalls, waves... If they were all at the same level then it wouldn't need to be MEAN sea level. What do you think it has to do with curvature? "all surveyors work from the same benchmarks" There's this thing called scale. Geodetic surveyors work over large distances, site surveyors over small distances. There's a significant difference when the amount of curvature is proportional to the distance measured.
    3
  35. Familiarity. You think people should be asking those with minimal knowledge on a subject rather than those who have the knowledge & experience?
    3
  36.  @nikkamanurung1766  It’s not “somewhat” proven; it was proven 2500 years ago. The shape has been exactly measured, we have highly accurate maps and we have satellites orbiting the Earth with live cameras onboard. Only conmen and gullible morons are arguing the Earth is flat or that it has any other shape. You can believe what you wish but beliefs do not change facts. Nobody has demonstrated that the sun goes around the Earth. The Ptolemaic system assumed the Earth was the center of the universe and depicted the sun orbiting the Earth. The Copernican system places the sun in the center of the solar system with all planets orbiting it.
    3
  37. Financial rewards are long since banned. Keep up.
    3
  38.  @lmathews5608  You think it is simpler to consider the details in 3 billion years in evolution from single cell organisms to a multitude of multicellular ones than to put it all down to an omnipotent entity snapping his fingers? "for us Christians science is fun and very interesting because after our imagination and dreaming" Your computer and its internet connection are imaginary? "the reality that only earth is habitable for humans" You've checked out every other planet in the universe or you're assuming that on the basis that you only know of this one?
    3
  39. What difference would that make?
    3
  40. There were six Apollo landings; they cost a fortune and far more unmanned missions could be achieved for less money.
    3
  41.  @Globeisahoaxx  We've noticed - you keep asking the same questions and always ignore the answers though you can never say what is wrong.
    3
  42. Do you know of any FE scientists?
    3
  43. The OT was written in Hebrew.
    3
  44. They’re two different things entirely. A law is a description of a phenomenon and offers no explanation how the phenomenon would work. A scientific theory is that explanation. One does not transition into the other.
    3
  45.  @KangenAlec  Why can it only illuminate one part of the disc when there is unobstructed view across the whole disc?
    3
  46. The video has been heavily edited.
    3
  47.  @Globeisahoax  The Gleason map says it’s a globe map; your delusion stops you reading the title.
    3
  48.  @matthewwilliams5964  I’ve told him a zillion times already. He seems delusional.
    3
  49. Things fall because they just do. They consider that profound thinking.
    3
  50.  @RockinRobbins13  You’re replying to the wrong person.
    3