General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Cole Behnke
TIKhistory
comments
Comments by "Cole Behnke" (@colebehnke7767) on "TIKhistory" channel.
Previous
9
Next
...
All
He is just a historian, doing what historians should do, looking at the sources and discovering their biases.
4
Like what?
4
Tell me you didn’t watch the video without telling me you didn’t watch the video…
4
@trogdor1977 so ad hominem, nice.
4
Privately owns how? If a church had the same power over a company you would say that they are church owned, so why is this different?
4
So why nationalize the stamp collectors, Other countries didn’t do that?
4
@Sal-l3f they had their own stamp collectors club that they pushed people into while punishing independent stamp collectors clubs… Like no other war economy did such a thing besides their fellow socialist ones.
4
How so?
4
Socialists always kill socialists, nothing new.
4
But no other classes.
4
@mirandela777 uh, what are you talking about? Watch the video. There was a split is socialist parties after the Russian civil war, with the majority believing socialism didn’t need a violent revolution, seeing how bad the Russian civil war was and how it destroyed the country.
4
@mirandela777 uh, the the argument is backed up by the fact that a substantial proportion of socialists at the time believed in it. Like the socialist party split into three after, and their main differences were about how to accomplish socialism now seeing the bloody Russian revolution what was caused by socialism. Like seriously, just watch the video. The whole thing about the Soviet Union being a failed attempt at socialism is barely relevant. You idiots get caught up in the smallest details when TIK makes shorter videos like this, and when he makes longer videos that address everything, you idiots don’t watch them.
4
What?
4
What propaganda?
4
@walterbailey2950 wow, a reactionary movement that implemented every policy that they where seemingly reacting against!
4
I mean it’s the socialist modus operandi to obfuscate and distort language to fit their subjective views, so no surprise that the national socialists did just that.
4
@guerillagardener2237 so government officials bought the company, and that’s somehow privatization?
4
@guerillagardener2237 uh, you did watch the video, did you not? They didn’t privatize the companies, they sold some of the stocks the government had to Nazi party officials. So they sold the government owned businesses to the government.
4
TIK addresses that in the video.
4
The problem is that video i easily refuted by TIK’s other videos.
4
Did you watch the video?
4
@owgdj Communism is socialism that divides the world based on class, Fascism is socialism that divides the world based on nation, and Nazism is socialism that divides the world based on race.
4
How so?
4
@metacube9913 how is this cope?
4
@metacube9913 what is factually wrong with it?
4
How so?
4
@seandouglas5429 but remember that to be a party member you had to submit to higher ranking members. The Nazi party was an organization into itself.
4
Here’s some facts. The Nazi party was a top down hierarchical organization where your membership depended on how well you followed the leader. The Nazi party was the state. Understating both of these you will have to agree that the Nazi “privatizing” was in reality moving ownership of industries from one state organization to another.
4
This is a hilariously bad argument, the Nazis aim was the same aim as every other socialist in history, socialists just don’t like admitting they want class genocide.
4
@WhiteWolf126 you said it yourself that the nazi party was the state, and we also know that the nazi party was a strict regimental organization that did not distinguish private from public within its party members. Putting these “privatized” industries into the hands of the Nazis was quite literally centralization. The Nazis didn’t have complete control over the government when they first took power, that’s what privatization was for, once he found parts of the government that didn’t support him he devolved them and gave the property to someone under his control.
4
@vasconcelossentimento where did he privatize? To whom? Socialists kill other socialists all the time.
4
Steal your labor how?
4
How so?
4
Not really.
4
@GhostSamaritan ok, so what happens if two individuals within a collective disagree about how something should be used, how do you deal with that?
4
So any actual arguments?
4
@chromaticstorm787 uh, Hitler believed in race socialism, and he believed the Jews corrupted it into class socialism. This is that your quote is saying. Hitler was a socialist, but he wasn’t a Marxist.
4
@andyknowles772 nationalizing the trade unions?
4
@bear3616 are you sure about that? How many socialist did he kill in Germany?
4
@andyknowles772 when a labor union is nationalized it becomes a servant of the state, not the workers. Additionally if your striking against a socialist state your are a capitalist counter-revolutionary and so your voice in no longer recognized as a worker.
4
@bear3616 I need numbers here, because we know what it looks like when Hitler doesn’t like a group, and that is millions die.
4
@hobbso8508 socialism doesn’t believe in democracy because to them all rights are actually privileges, and if your not using your privileges to benefit the collective then they will be taken away.
4
Capitalists also funded communism, so I don’t know what to tell you.
4
So you don't watch the video?
4
Why?
4
Both of your quotes don’t support your argument, Himmler was obviously talking about the fact that they couldn’t establish a socialist economy until they won and had lebensraum. Hitler was talking about how capitalism will case the end of the world via the shrinking markets problem, and though a socialist economy Germany would survive.
4
Socialists always kill other socialists, nothing new.
4
pantsmonsterv6 what about nationalism makes it right wing? Would do you think about nationalist left of Canada?
4
Also, why would Hitler establish excessive price controls, remove private property protections, and create the bureaucracy to centrally control the economy if he was a diehard liberal?
4
Because the command economy is what makes socialism socialism.
4
Previous
9
Next
...
All